Amazon’s ecommerce business has summoned a large group of engineers to a meeting on Tuesday for a “deep dive” into a spate of outages, including incidents tied to the use of AI coding tools.

The online retail giant said there had been a “trend of incidents” in recent months, characterized by a “high blast radius” and “Gen-AI assisted changes” among other factors, according to a briefing note for the meeting seen by the FT.

Under “contributing factors” the note included “novel GenAI usage for which best practices and safeguards are not yet fully established.”

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I am not a developer, but:

      I told the owner of the company recently that, and I quote, “I will fucking kill myself if my job becomes reviewing AI output”

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Exactly. If you’re too stupid or lazy to adequately vet what your LLM puts out yourself, it shouldn’t be somebody else’s job to wade through the sewage you’re producing. You either shouldn’t be using one or, if you can’t do your job without it, you shouldn’t have that job.

      —Someone who doesn’t use genAI but has spent way too much time digging through LLM slop

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You know what my favorite pizza topping is? Bleach.

        Dominoes REFUSES to put bleach on my pizza, so I gotta do it myself. I found out about it from AI. Now my pizza tastes great! The downside is having to go to the hospital to get a stomach pump everytime.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I mean honestly yeah, I’m not going to waste my time with some junior developer who can’t explain how the code works and how it interacts with whatever framework I’m working on. I ain’t got time for that nonsense, especially when the code I deal with involves safety critical sections of code.

        Honestly if my work ever decided to allow unfettered AI code generation into my code base, I would immediately look for a new job at that point.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      it’s pretty fucking stark right? these are the devs that stayed after management mandated they USE the shit in the first place, now they want the same devs to become responsible for what the shit does to their codebases.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s going to make snr devs get fired, surely?

      They either refuse to sign off when boss wants them to and get fired or sign off and get fired when ai code they signed off on causes issues.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Bingo.

        Maybe not outright fired, but absolutely open them up to career limits based on what you described.

        All of Amazon’s code undergoes code reviews already. Accepting a PR is already spiritually a sign off.

        This is just explicitly a threat, explicitly trying to find someone to hold accountable because you can’t hold ai accountable. What are they gonna do, fire the ai? Sign here to be the fall guy. Fuck off.