• EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    Can’t wait for the next Luigi to use one of these on an Epstein CEO. Polymarket, please let me make that bet.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Notably absent… the explosives.

    But sure, if you are wondering how folks out in Yemen or Gaza managed to retaliate against their oppressors for so long, this is a textbook example of how and why. What’s being proposed is collection of technology we’ve had since at least the 1960s that’s slowly made its way into civilian circulation.

    Also…

    Khojayev’s just-launched prototype has no effectiveness track record

    I mean, we’re seeing what “just-launched prototypes with no effective track record” have accomplished on the Ukraine-Russia front-lines and it’s a decidedly mixed bag.

    I think a harder question to answer is “Who would be interested in putting one of these into practical use?” And that gets to the real value-add of a Stinger MANPAD. Namely, the humans willing and practiced enough to use it.

    Also - and again, this cannot be overstated - the model above has no explosives installed. Idk how confident I’d be around one of these things if it was actually armed.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      You don’t need explosives. It has a spot in the front for a camera. One of the new microcontrollers with AI accelerators can do face recognition extremely quickly. It would be possible to use it as an assassination tool.

      Even if you changed nothing about the design, the speed and mass of the thing hitting a person in the face could kill.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It’s not a MANPAD really.

      The sensor package has no IR sensor (or radar unit) and no way to proximity fuse.

      It has GPS, accelerometer and barometric pressure. It’s more like a rocket powered artillery shell than an anti-air weapon.

      Or, given the lack of payload, it’s more like a high speed burrito delivery device.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Atomize* some propelant, boom, explosive.

      * english choose the dumbest word for “zerstäuben”.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Atomize* some propelant, boom, explosive.

        The trick is to get the atomized propelant to “boom, explosive” at the target and not in your backpack.

        Also, you probably want a “boom” sufficient to accomplish whatever demolition you’re planning, which - again - raises the stakes regarding what’s in your backpack.

        There’s a classic little film called “The Wages of Fear” that explores the hazards of amateurs transporting high explosives over long distances.

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I mean, spray the leftover fuel into the oxygen-filled head only on target? It wouldn’t stay atomized for long anyway. And for the boom, the shell needs only be strong enough. Wouldn’t that work?

          Sure, there’s more effective explosives.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Wouldn’t that work?

            Idk, you wanna find out?

            Listen, if you’ve got the specs for military ordinance and want to say “We’ve done this a thousand times, it works fine” that’s one thing.

            But it’s very much another to just wave your hands and announce “you know, the boom-boom juice goes here and the detonator goes there and it’ll probably do something.”

  • slackj_87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Great… can’t wait for politicians to use this as a way to pass “common sense” legislation banning 3D printers.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Aren’t they already doing that due to their hysteria over “ghost” guns?

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I wonder if there is some archive or torrent for STL files, like an archive of thingiverse or something. Would be nice to archive that just in case.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        Is that even necessary? Anyone with a CAD tool can recreate the 3D printed parts from a glance and a few specs.

        It’s literally a tube. Which—to be fair—is a “weapon of mass destruction” according to President Bush (the other war criminal president).

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They can try, but the parts that make up a printer are used in tons of other applications. It isn’t hard to build one from scratch.

    • Dettweiler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’re already trying that in New York and California, unfortunately. “Any 3D printer capable of printing parts for firearms” was the verbage, from what I recall.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You don’t need to ban 3D printers. Restrictions and licensing requirements for making, using, owning rockets and guidance software are enough.

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        His guidance is just wifi cameras talking to it. Not sure it even is using gps.

        To ban stuff like this you have to ban a lot of useful tech

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        This already would fall under an FFL for legal citizens anyway. As is the nature of the internet though, this open design will be preserved and available for those who seek it.

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes. I am actually surprised we haven’t seen a major terrorist attack in a western country using remote controlled or autonomous drones for example. The technology has been available for years now.

          3D printed home made guns like the FGC-9 and Urutau have been around for a while now, but remain marginal in gun crime.

          As you say, the cat is out the bag and on the internet forever. However homemade guns and instructions on how to make them have been around for decades.

          • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Most western terrorist attacks are by opportunistic losers who don’t have the knowledge or motivation to do something like this.

            They’d rather drive a car into people who make them angry and use a gun they already own.

            As for organized groups until recently there have been any good reason for an attack from any centrally organized group.

          • eleitl@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Ukraine and Russia are western countries. Narco cartels have started using fpv drones, too.

  • mbirth 🇬🇧@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Do you have natural freckles or did you use that shoulder-mounted guided missile prototype again?”

  • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    That’s fucking nuts.

    I have a lot of thoughts, but all I can really say is that’s fucking nuts.

  • testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wish the video actually had him using it to hit a drone or something. As is, it only shows one actual launch, and it didn’t look all that impressive. His motors didn’t seem to have enough umph to let the missile stabilize properly.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Neat. I wonder if there is anything you can use as a warhead without it becoming a destructive device. Chalk rounds?

    I’m also curious to know the rocket velocity compared to actual MANPADS. I’ll have to watch the videos later because I’m also curious about whether they’re independent or require the launching laptop to stay connected.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Velocity and range are also my main questions, as well as tracking quality and speed. The video doesn’t demonstrate it hitting a flying target.

      Common MANPADS like Stinger, Strela, etc. use infrared tracking. The seekers are high performance and fast but need complex supercooling with gas. Using a MANPADS you only have seconds, to arm, aim and track, then fire the missile against a fast moving target before it‘s out of range. These can hit low flying supersonic jets.

      Still this project is very impressive and hints at the possibility to build cheap low end MANPADS that can target slow moving strike and observation drones, maybe helicopters.

      It’s another indicator, that mass produced cheap precision weapons are a major trend in warfare.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Potentially could be used for things like spreading flame-retardent powder for putting out a wildfire or similar with more precision. Would also remove the risk of a human life in firefighting so areas might be cleared quicker.