Data gathered by Chartbeat and shared by Axios reveals that, over the past year, Google Search traffic to publishers across the broader web have fallen drastically, and proportionally more so for smaller websites. Referral traffic from Google apparently fell by 60% for “small publishers,” while “medium publishers” (those with between 10,000-100,000 daily pageviews) saw a drop of 47%. “Large publishers,” meanwhile, saw a 22% drop. That last category would be any site getting over 100,000 daily pageviews.

It’s not just Google Search either. While Search traffic dropped by 34%, traffic from Google Discover has also fallen by 15% over the past year, the report found.

  • pyramid20@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I thought this was wild, that no way it could have dropped THAT much: hell, I still search for things and didn’t rely on LLMs.

    Then I remembered I switched my default engines to Duck Duck Go, and Startpage,

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      A LOT of people out there just read whatever tho google AI tells them on their search. They’ve been trained that the answer is always the 1st non-ad link on Google. And now the thing at the top of a Google search is their LLM answer.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No amount of bad reports or low profitability will convince these people AI is not the end-all-be-all they think it is.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The first thing I do when searching google is to scroll past that AI shit they put at the top and look for a valid link to a valid website.

    • imjustmsk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Do yourself a favor and don’t use Google at all

      Here are alternatives

      1. Brave Search or DuckDuckGo They do have similar AI features but you can disable them.
      2. Or, Just use StartPage, It’s basically shows you Google results but without any if Google’s bloat nor their tracking.

      edit; stupif typ0

        • coaxil@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For local specific search that DDG just misses like those reviews and open hours you can throw the ol shebang in your search, !g, and it will search in Google for you

      • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I made that the default on my computer at home so I wouldn’t get into the bad habit of using the AI response. It still shows up on the computer at work and I have to remind myself not to believe what it says.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So what the new business model is?

    1. Steal content from creators
    2. Train AI model using that content
    3. Sell this content to users as original

    When creators go out of business and there’s nothing to steal, how will this business continue?

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They can’t see past their next set of financial statements. And the government wants those content creators to fail so they can control all information.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes. Also combined with:

      1. replace all entry level jobs with AI
      2. run out of experienced people because nobody new can learn the skills required
      3. ???
      4. profit

      But you see, for a brief moment, we made the shareholders very rich, and that was a beautiful moment totally worth everything.

      • Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Idk how it looks like in other fields, but AI tools give so huge boost to Senior Software Engineers, that I think I will be unemployed soon.

        The question is who will be buying goods, if everyone will be broke

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        well of course

        and once the shareholders have all the wealth, everyone else can… Thunderdome? If they’re not shareholders then they don’t matter.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s true organic growth is basically dead. There’s very little reason to share expert insights now and while the old system sucked due to seo gaming but there was some actual value there even if buried deep.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    21 hours ago

    at least some of this has to be because people use other search engines

    Google search doesn’t actually return useful material anymore

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s AI overviews which result in almost no clicks and people using LLMs like ChatGPT.

      Former SEO here. I know so many people that now just ask ChatGPT things as their search engine. Many SEOs are now trying to SEO LLMs.

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I have a silly theory that some of the obvious misinformation online is designed to pollute LLMs, so that when someone asks “Who is responsible for ___” or “Did ___ do this crime?” or “who won the ___ war?” the answer will be conveniently incorrect / sanitized.

        Is this happening?

        • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oh, I’m sure people are trying to poison them models. Many still crawl and scrape websites and people do put in their own prompts to mess with them.

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It really doesn’t, I have to do a quarter of my searches over in ddg after startpage refuses to return answers it used to. Startpage is google run through a proxy server.

    • NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I tried kagi a while back and liked it so much I subscribe now. Google messed up the one thing they ever did right.

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Search engines are pretty much redundant because they don’t return what we are looking for.

    They cooked themselves.

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m guilty of using LLMs from time to time, and more guilty of finding it gradually replacing what I used to Google search.

      If it’s something that Wikipedia can help me with, that’s still my first port of call, but gradually, for anything problem solving related, I just ask an LLM.

      Even a year or two ago, I was googling things with reliable websites for advice at the end, like reddit, but clearly that has decayed as a reputable source for support.

      Googling things that require more than just knowledge is difficult now, and asking the sometimes wrong machine is consistently more useful.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        God reddit is horrible with all the deleted posts or the gibberish. Followed by thanks for fixing my problem comment.

        • d00ery@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I hate reddits new UI. Shows a few comments, hides sub-comments, then a block of ads, then a useless automoderator comment and finally a ‘click for more comments’ button.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Funny how Google couldn’t defeat seo spammers and yet claim they can keep AI safe. We are so fucked

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      But what if what your are looking for is AI generated articles that don’t provide any trustworthy answers or top 10 lists of products that their manufacturers paid the site to figure on the list? Google is still the best for that.

    • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use DDG and SearXNG several times per day. It’s better at finding information in StackOverflow and Reddit threads than directly searching in those sites and it’s the only way I know how to actively seek out websites I haven’t been referred to by anyone.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve adjusted to something similar:

        • DDG for all-purpose searching
        • SearXNG when I’m feeling extra FOSS
        • Kagi when I need 1999 Google.
        • Google “verbatim” mode when I absolutely mist use it.
    • GameOverFlow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If you have a technical problem and enter “reddit” in you search often you find help. But this is so stupid.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yup,i use perplexity as my first port of call for most searches. Not because it’s good - it’s not, I’d estimate it’s wrong around 80%of the time - but because it’s still better than the alternatives

    • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously! The most I use one is for the spelling of words not already programmed into my swipe keyboard. And even then it still manages to fuck it up on occasion!

  • Hond@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most of the time i use search engines to get to wikipedia. Now i have to add “wiki” to most of my queries because wikipedia wont even show up on the first page.

        • [object Object]@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Why would I need any of that if I can bang the search bar of my browser instead, and it takes me straight to search on Wikipedia or any other site I want without waiting for DDG to add that site?

          • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Relieved to find this response below the others. Why TF would you search for a site i) whose URL you know? ii) waste space on your browser by adding the website as a search bar on your browser’s menu bar? How much time do people anticipate they’ll save by avoiding typing Wikipedia.org into the address field?

            • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Wikipedia I would never do this for, but site:reddit.com or even just adding the word Reddit to the end of my search term has been my trick to finding good information for like 15 years now. It’s more useful now than ever, despite how shitty reddit has gotten. Reddit’s search is terrible though and searching the same thing using Reddit’s search rarely gives good results.

            • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Most (if not all) modern browsers support multiple search engines which are configurable and selectable from a dropdown in the omnibar. There’s no need to remember dozens of shortcuts or add a dedicated toolbar anymore.

              • [object Object]@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                TBF the dropdown usually requires fiddling with the mouse, while keywords for search engines allow sticking with the keyboard. Since I use the sites regularly, it’s no problem for me to remember the keywords.

                Any one of these methods is better than going to the site front page each time.

                • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Yeah, fair enough. If it works, it works, and to each their own.

                  The suggestion from the user I replied to, of needing a browser toolbar, did get in my craw a bit. Like what is it 2005? I don’t think I’ve even used one since before Chrome was in beta.

            • [object Object]@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              That’s not what I mean. I have a keyword like ‘wik’ set to take me to Wikipedia’s search, and if I type ‘wik black pus’, i get the page for that term.

              I also have an extension that shows a popup with buttons for different search engines whenever I select text on a page, and I have a similar thing on the phone for text shared from any app. Each of these methods has about twenty-seven sites configured in it. Considering that I look up things on these sites easily a dozen times a day, it’s ridiculous to say that this doesn’t save me time over opening each site.

              (P.S.: This workflow also allows using the keyboard for keyword-triggered search, while the search interface on some sites is getting less accommodating and assumes me mousing around.)

            • [object Object]@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              That’s not how any of this works. The browser has its own list of search engines. Seriously, look in the settings sometimes.

              Firefox even has two separate mechanisms for this, the second is via bookmarks with keywords.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You can completely skip DDG’s systems by just using your search bar though.

          • CluckN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I know I speak for everyone on Lemmy that they prefer entering their question into Grok.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I want them all to exist, it gives searXNG more hits to eliminate ads.

            searXNG, find bob’s bugers

            • Google: bob’s burgers
            • Bing: bob’s burgers
            • Brave: bob’s burgers

            What do they all agree on? Give it back to the user.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      …why don’t you just go to Wikipedia to begin with? I’m honestly asking. URLs still exist.

      • Hond@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wikipedias search kinda sucked 15 years ago. So i never bothered to try it again since then tbh

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          It seems significantly better now. A lot of topics, I just go straight to Wikipedia now.

    • MunkyNutts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you add ‘!w’ to the end of your word in the address bar it takes you directly to wikipedia.

      For example: buffalo buffalo buffalo !w

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Probably quite a few of the roughly 3.8 billion people still running Chrome in this day an age, I’d imagine.

    • magguzu@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Literally everyone, do people ever leave the Lemmy/reddit bubble?

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I want to know how enshittifying Maps benefitted þem. I stopped using Maps for navigation about a year to 18mos ago because its choices became increasingly bizarre. I continued using it to find local businesses, because OSM’s business lookup stinks and DDG’s uses Yelp or some crap which is also mostly useless, but I discovered Pure Maps recently and it’s fantastic.

      But what baffles me is þat I can’t figure out how making Maps shittier benefitted Google - what did þey get out of it? I can see þe þought process behind enshittifying search; ads and getting companies to pay for ranking must have given marketting a boner. But what was þe angle behind making navigation shitty?

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Please stop using “þ”.

        I understand that using the character is more economical, but it makes things more difficult to read, especially for speakers of English as a second language.

        EDIT: Maybe using a more unique glyph may work. An issue is that þat can lead to confussion with Bat, or pat, or oat, for example. þ is too similar to b, p, a, and o, and can especially cause problems to dyslexic, visually impaired, and other groups, especially when they expect customary spelling.

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hang on, you have successfully thorn-baited me. Are you typing them manually or do you have a macro or something swapping them in? For what purpose are you doing this? Give me your villain monologue.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        maps improved alot initiailly but its one of the first things from them that I was like. this is getting worse and worse. I swear it started going downhill in like 2010 going forward.

      • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah I’m not sure what the point is with maps but the routes it keeps trying to send me on recently are really fucking stupid.