• moopet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    God I hate that the younger generations use the word “drop” to mean both “cancel” and “release”.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Say goodbye to whatever miniscule revenue you were guns get there. The faster these fucking slop bots die the better.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which is an interesting take, because anything sex-related seems to be the only way to make money with AI.

    • XLE@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I hope the real reason is that they’re running out of money to try new features. But some of their stated reasons, like their AI age verification sucks, aren’t so bad either.

      …Actually, OpenAI has a suspicious number of reasons why they can’t do adult mode. I think they protest too much.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        nVidia had announced that instead of 100 billion for nothing to OpenAI that they were doing 30 billion for stake, and said they were probably not going to keep giving these ‘halo’ AI companies money after this.

        I also saw a report that banks were starting to get a bit more stingy with money to the same companies.

        I think that while there’s still plenty of money coming in still, it does seem like the ‘take our unlimited cash just because you have AI in your name’ phase is wearing out and they actually have to try to convince people now.

        Which is a pretty big problem for them, as despite their brand recognition they aren’t really seen as the ‘leader’ in the AI space on any particular front.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think it’s that they are preparing for IPO, which means opening their books and being an attractive investment.

        Sora was killed because it haemorrhaged cash for each generation. Investors wouldn’t be comfortable with that still running in the books.

        This is killed because a respectable investment does sell porn.

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it’s about video generation. They shut down Sora because it was burning too much money. Imagine how much a massive amount of porn videos would cost.

        • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This here. The dirty not-at-all-a-secret is that NONE of it is profitable. It is all a money-burning, water-wasting, RAM-market-sucking black hole.

          There is no road to profitability unless they somehow convince everyone to pay multiple thousands of dollars per year for subscriptions. At least that’s what I keep hearing; evidence otherwise with real references, I’m open to consider.

          EDIT: backblack

          • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yep. I bet the reason they never actually closed the deal with Disney is that Disney discovered that shitty Sora CG cost more than their in house systems.

            • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 day ago

              Or because of that recent ruling that you can’t copyright AI generated images. If Disney can’t copyright the videos Sora produces, then it’s useless to them.

        • XLE@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think even the text prompts are unprofitable. Sam Altman said so once, even for paid plans. I wonder if they’re still in danger of bleeding themselves dry. One can dream.

        • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That was probably what sunk the Disney deal.

          Disney can already make shitty CG animation for basically nothing. What Sora did was offer a way of doing it without any real expertise, but Disney already had that. It was probably impossible for Sora to actually produce lower-tier Disney content for less than Disney is already able to do it for.

  • Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t all this “OpenAI drops…” stuff (goonbot, Sora/Disney, etc) all because of Altman’s recent statement that they’re going to switch to being a one trick pony shop? As in: one product, win or lose.

    But if it’s lose, I guarantee they’ll Ministry of Truth that statement.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, very likely. I suppose the product focus will be government/military. They will get the AI find people to disappear or pick bombing targets. That’s apparently a profitable endeavor.

    • XLE@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their statement in this article has a half dozen different reasons for dropping the project. A suspicious number of reasons, and all of them sound more like excuses. You’re definitely right about the Ministry of Truth though, because this embarrassment has been in development since 2024.

    • unnamed1@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think ai as technology needs saving, but the companies of the bursting bubble do. I love to see Altman struggle

      • XLE@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s hard to tell when he’s genuinely miserable because his face always looks like that.

    • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      For the simple reason that is is REALLY cheap to make and monetize real porn.

      The only people using AI to make porn are people who wouldn’t be able to pay for it if they charged what it costs to use.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s really cheap to use a WAN model (or whatever the latest thing is) on my laptop to make porn without needing to find and hire a model, or even subscribe to an onlyfans. Also not paying OpenAI or anyone else besides the electric bill.

        I don’t think that’s going away, and I would be a bit surprised if it’s not already cutting into demand for the real thing (which I also think isn’t going away)

          • davidgro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            What company? I mean local models.

            Edit: Oh, WAN is the name of a model that makes videos, it’s not Wide Area Network.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d think that custom AI-generated smut videos would be all the rage. It’s one area where the content being slop shouldn’t matter as much.

    Hey, look, that lady has 3 breasts. Aw, here comes Double Dong Danny to get some of that. Man, this is some fucked up shit. Grabs a box of tissues.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How many people pay for porn though?

      The outliers, the people making sure your local furry artist can afford a wacom tablet, they’re not gonna drop that money on any old ramshod image thrown together out of statically likely pixels. Who’s gonna pay for all the server time needed to generate the lowest quality of the lowest common denominator smut?

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Genuinely curious if you’ve found a good porn site that isn’t already incorporating these. The ones I frequent have them already fairly regularly but they are heavily down voted and have an uncanny valley feel to them that is a real turnoff. Not at all “all the rage”

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not something I’ve actively looked into, quite honestly. Didn’t find the Ripley’s Believe It or Not museum particularly arousing, so I assume it wouldn’t be my jam.

          • melfie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            23 hours ago

            That’s a good idea; I’ll be sure and pre-flight next time. Also my mom is dead, so I doubt she would mind. Just one extra worm wiggling around in there.

    • Lanske@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Double Dong Danny”, that comment made me spit out my coffee and made my day!

      • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        For a few frames, there are actually three, and it turns into something a lot like a hand when he goes for the ass

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    dammit… I was hoping for ad infested AI girlfriends running skynet would save us from skynet effectiveness at genocide.

  • lmr0x61@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Damn, they don’t even think the goonbot will sell? They really must be in a tough spot lmao

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yet another area where the big companies are voluntarily leaving money on the table for the open model users to rake in. I approve.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, but the flip side is that it also comes with controversy, and I could imagine that it’s more hassle for OpenAI than it’s worth.

      Plus, there are some scaling issues. There is a varying collection of social norms around the world that vary when it comes to sexuality. Some people are going to get really upset if there’s a chatbot that violates their social norms. Some of those social norms change (e.g. the UK just put out that restriction on choking pornography).

      And then you’ve got privacy issues. My own suspicion is that erotica might be a driver for LLMs-on-local-hardware.

      Given how much money OpenAI is burning, I’d guess that they really have to get agentic stuff, more-advanced stuff working. And I don’t know how much overlap there is on making general-knowledge AI and erotica generation stuff. Like, one point I recall someone making on /r/LocalLLama was that MoEs haven’t worked incredibly well with creative writing…but it might be that MoEs are a better approach for problem solving.

      Like, I agree that there’s demand. And I’m pretty sure that there’s gonna be an industry filling that (maybe after hardware prices have come down). But I’m not sure that it’s the best bet for OpenAI.