• Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “That’s it?! That’s the nuclear power? That’s just boiling water!”

      Ancient meme I had back in the day…

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man… can you imagine? Someone could shut down the whole power grid just by watching all that water.

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can’t find it for the life of me… Describing a web comic vs actually posting it always feels like a flop, but…

    Aliens abduct a physicist, who doesn’t seem to give much of a damn about the abduction but is instead enthused to learn about the alien tech on board, so they give him a tour of the ship. They get to the power reactor and start dropping a bunch of sci-fi jumbo about “We harness dark matter to… (sci-fi Ruth Goldberg machine) …and finally, we use the heat it generates to boil water and crank a turbine!!”

    *Physicist drops to his knees in despair and let’s out a dramatic ‘noooooo!’

     

    Paraphrasing heavily due to having shit memory. I thought it was a SMBC comic, but… /shrug.

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      “And then, the power generated is used to heat water and generate steam!”

      “No…”

      “That steam is used to turn a wheel!”

      “No! NOOOOOOO!!!”

      “Hey dude, calm down.”

      -Actual exchange during first contact.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was talking with my wife about a comic similar to that not even three hours ago so if you find it let me know cause I want to show her too.

    • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I swear we are going to be travelling to other planets and the biggest issue is going to be how do we stop water leaking into space from our steam turbines

  • Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even wind power still turns a generator, but solar is just completely different than everything else

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s cheaper now to install panels over the full footprint of a concentrator than to build a concentrator and a small solar panel or any sort of solar thermal generator

        • vodka@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          But then we’re not boiling something to spin a turbine, and what’s the point in living then

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re actually quite similar to thermoelectric generators. But the potential difference between two semi conductors is created by a heat differential rather than by photon excitation.

      Thermoelectric generators have been used on various rovers and deep space probes as well as in remote lighthouses.

    • nomecks@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re in luck. Supercritical CO2 turbines are a thing now, and they’re way more efficient because they don’t involve a phase change.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s funny (in a sad and sardonic sense) - I pay attention to the energy industry and the outcry over data centers has got me watching these generators closely. If they deliver on their promises, they could represent a great way to deliver on mirror-based solar reactors in areas with limited water resources. (And to recapture and use waste heat from the servers of data centers.)

        Society is on the precipice of investing a lot into increasing energy generation for data centers that have to be near the same sorts of resources that people need - fresh water, environs conductive to generating power, stable (enough) climates. But this technology is arriving/set to reach adoption just in time for this boom-bust cycle. All those data centers in populated areas already have a timer ticking for when the shell corps have their rugs pulled.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unfortunately, there’s no way to get energy out of waste heat that won’t be spent pushing that heat a little harder. Already a significant amount of energy is spent cooling data centers, any attempts at energy recapture will just make that cooling harder.

          The best we can do is something like district heating, because heat pumps can get over 100% effective efficiency.

          • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The energy needed for phase change for supercritical CO2 is substantially lower than steam.

            There’s more wiggle room. My understanding is that similar to heat pumps, they can build systems with different optimal temperatures, and even daisy chain them together. They’ll never make a perpetual motion machine, but they can waste less energy.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        At some point you are going to need steam to spin a turbine to generate enough energy to compress the CO2.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Solar cells, technically.

      boiling water systems have a thermal efficiency of ~40% Solar cells are closer to 45% efficient

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They would melt, but we do also have gamma voltaics which can use the gamma radiation from fission and fusion to generate electricity they just have an atrocious efficiency

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doesn’t seem particularly efficient to me… The sun burns hundreds of millions of tons of hydrogen every second. The amount of released energy we actually put to use is indistinguishable from zero, not 45%.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, that’s like pointing out that a coal plant isn’t very efficient because it doesn’t burn all the coal on Earth at once.

        • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          If we put it like that, every other energy source on earth begins that way and adds at least one conversion step.

          … except for fusion of course.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Exactly.

            Nuclear plants are probably the least efficient, because they required all that fusion energy inside earlier stars to build hydrogen into uranium, and we can only extract a tiny portion of that trapped fusion energy through fission.

  • pntha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    fission. aside from the fact physicists didn’t invent either, we’ve yet to boil any water with fusion.

  • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Iirc one of the theoretical ways of generating power with fusion is magnetohydrodynamic generators which use the magnetic field created by the plasma to generate an electrical current directly. Still theoretical though…