• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is old technology that is more expensive/complicated/maintenance-ey than PV. An economic falacy is that if you have oil/fossils you should use that instead of solar. It’s always better to use cheapest energy. Export the fossils, import solar. It is more jobs to have solar as well, and in fact most of the deployment costs are local work/materials (wiring/support structures).

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I really like the concentrated solar systems that use molten salt, where rather than heating water directly, molten salt is heated and stored In large insulated tanks and tapped off to a heat exchanger to run the turbines, thus allowing power generation to match demand and continue at a constant rate even when light level very (such as at night).

    One interesting idea is to use a concentrated solar system to run an Einstein–Szilard refrigerator, or some other absorption refrigerator cycle.

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Solar thermal is kinda obsolete I thought, now China is churning out PVs for pennies.

    • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Solar thermal has some distinct advantages when you start talking about really big instillations. Especially when considering power storage, molten salt systems can store heat and allow the generators to keep working even at night. Much cheaper than batteries at very large scales.

      Thermal solar systems are generally very efficient when the goal is heating something, not just generating power. So say, you want to run an ammonia plant without burning natural gas, or if you want to melt down metals for recycling. There are so many industrial applications where it’s a better way of doing it than using an electric heating element.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      But t solar boiler can still be useful in some cases. Where heated water in “solar” on the roof is used immediately for shower etc.

      • Redjard@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Modern solar into a modern heat pump is gonna be more efficient than heating water. It’s also more versatile and convenient, cause it maintains that efficiency when you pull power from the grid at night. And of course lets you use the power for other purposes.

        • freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I agree. But installing a waterboiler on a roof right above a shower is a lot simpler and probably still cheaper, for example in a camping hut situation, so off grid

          • Redjard@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Lots of huts probably have an ac or heater. This could all be the same device, at which point it’d definitely be easier than running the pipes for water and maintaining pumps and a dedicated tank.
            Don’t see a reason you couldn’t have a simple ac window unit that also has a warm water port, which you plug a single cable into going straight to your pannels on the roof.

            Edit: And once batteries are more affordable (or if you have a few grand to burn) you can then plug in a battery pack conveniently on the indoors side of your window unit.
            The indoors side can just have a few regular outlets you can extension cord around to where you need them.

    • oneser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I mean it seems the more complex solution in deployment for sure, but its design could still have use in low heat industrial uses (sub 250°C, e.g. food prep, textile, sanitation etc.) where it is used heat -> heat rather than heat -> electricity -> heat. Maybe these replace thermal collectors eventually.

      But that is not the point of this meme at all, just my thoughts.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Only with small temperature differences, the higher the difference the lower the COP.

            • zout@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I really don’t get where those temperatures come from? I was referring to something like this. The higher the temperature difference between cold and warm side, to worse the COP gets. If you wanted to go from ambient to 200°C, the COP would drop lower than 1 and you’d be better off using an electric boiler.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Hydro is the OG boiled water.

      Sun heats water. Water evaporates. Go up high. Falls down. Turn turbine.

      Wind power is a side effect of the same process happening on a rotating globe.