jackiemeaiii@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 days agoDid you just assume my rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1737arrow-down112
arrow-up1725arrow-down1imageDid you just assume my rulelemmy.blahaj.zonejackiemeaiii@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 days agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarefrayedpickles@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 days agoNot what I asked, but understood
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days ago What’s the issue? It has the wrong implications. Sorry, I wasn’t clear! It also sounds lewd but there’s a similar debate about “queer” even though that one has been mostly reclaimed.
minus-squareSop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoIt seems quite literally what you asked? If not then you should rephrase.
Not what I asked, but understood
Sorry, I wasn’t clear!
It also sounds lewd but there’s a similar debate about “queer” even though that one has been mostly reclaimed.
It seems quite literally what you asked? If not then you should rephrase.