I’ve used proton for a year or two now and it is fine. Great for use on my phone when I want to use public/airport wifi and it sort of kind of works with gluetun (the rotating port is annoying but it still is a forwarded port).

But I’ve increasingly been annoyed with Proton as a company and am looking to migrate my email/domain to fastmail in the very near future. I COULD continue to just pay for the vpn (60 USD a year is pretty reasonable) but also feel like this is a good opportunity to “shop around”

Checked the wiki and other FAQs (which all basically crib from said wiki) and they all basically boil down to proton or mullivad… except that mullivad apparently stopped allowing port forwarding which is a bit of an issue for any torrents and the like.

So are there any other good options?

Thanks

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I thought about publishing a Terraform module one time that spins up a cheap VPS, installs OpenVPN and then gives you a config with a certificate. You could run it for just a few hours at a time, and use destroy when you’re done. But then I got really bored because I have ADHD.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not a VPN, but you may also want to look into I2P.

    https://i2pd.website/

    https://proprivacy.com/privacy-service/guides/i2p-guide

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=FNp0TRDG0BQ

    Basically, a p2p protocol for the entire internet.

    Its considerably more complicated to set up than most modern VPNs, where nowaday’s its usually as simple as install an app with a GUI, verify some settings and you’re good to go, and i2p is also quite slow…

    … but its totally free, and you can torrent over it, and as far as I know, if you’ve set it up properly, it is basically undetectable by ISPs, due to how it uses ‘garlic’ routing: basically, a whole bunch of users net requests are encrypted, anonymized, and then smashed into a big packet… so an ISP would have to untangle all of that for every packet, and afaik, none of them have figured out how.

    I2P would obviously be horrible for watching streaming content though, snail speed.

  • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love Mullvad, but if you need P2P its not the best option. If you just need a VPN, though, its amazing. Today I just switched to AirVPN and am running it on Arch through Eddie. Have my qbittorrent set up to only allow connections through Eddie and just forwarded my first port. I’m very happy with it.

    I think the only downside is that I could get Mullvad for 5eur a month on a month by month basis. AirVPN is 7eur or 15eur for three months, so I have to lock into the three months to get the same price.

    • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Worth noting that Italy (location of airvpn) hates vpns and is constantly fucking around with them, to the point air doesn’t even actually operate in Italy to preserve users privacy. Right now, theres no immediate risk, but it’ is worth keeping an eye on the political situation in Italy regarding VPN laws

      • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I did read this somewhere before. I just have to take my chances at the moment. My other option was Windscribe, but unless you’re paying for a year+ their prices are astronomical.

        • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah I use airvpn myself, its just worth throwing that info out for full transparency/disclosure

    • quack@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Good choice for privacy, not so much for piracy. They removed their port forwarding feature a while ago.

      • TauZero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        IMHO if you don’t have a globally-reachable address or forwarded port, you are not really a participant of the internet, you are just a receptacle xD

        One service I never see mentioned is OVPN. They have a 1-to-1 feature parity with mullvad and were an easy drop-in replacement when mullvad closed their ports:

        • wireguard
        • port forwarding
        • no usernames/emails/registration, only account numbers
        • crypto payments/cash in the mail
        • same price as mullvad
        • multiple device keys
        • multihop
        • no bandwidth limits
        • setup guides
        • status dashboard

        I used mullvad for years, sad to see them go, and all my scripts basically worked without any change other than the server addresses/public keys. Only downside is they don’t have as many users so not as many servers. I wish more people would join up so I get more IPs to choose from :D

    • Eyro Elloyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mullvad is so great in a vacuum, but it seems like every other website has you writing out a captcha or blocking you outright exclusively because you’re on mullvad.

        • Trihilis@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve decided I’m not using websites that block mullvad anymore. I’m talking about a hard block like reddit does and not a captcha (captcha is fine by me).

          If they’re doing that much trouble to prevent me from using a VPN they must me doing some pretty shady shit with my data.

          I will not move to another VPN because of all VPNs I feel Mullvad respects my privacy most.

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve used AirVPN for this exact setup and it works great. The port forwarding is static and doesn’t change once setup. I switched to proton because it was convenient, I was already paying for ProtonMail et all, so I dropped the extra VPN subscription when it renewed.

  • str33k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll add another recommendation for Windscribe. I’ve had a lifetime subscription since 2017 and have never had issues. I use it for normal internet usage pretty much daily and the occasional torrenting.

  • matey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What’s going on with Proton the company?

    Edit: ah fuck, thanks for the replies. Sigh.

  • BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Great for use on my phone when I want to use public/airport wifi

    If you just want the tunnel encryption you can try hosting a VPN on your own home network. It’s what I do since I don’t need to spoof my location.

    You are asking in the piracy community so I’m assuming you’re also using it to torrent (which a home VPN won’t help with) but you didn’t specifiy so I’m not sure

  • zedgeist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just throwing in another voice for PIA. Their corporate owners may be questionable, but I’ve been with them since before they sold out and have never heard a peep from my ISP for seeding terabytes of torrents. They don’t keep logs, and they are audited to prove it regularly.

    EDIT: They also have port forwarding, but not for every exit server.

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The requirement for port forwarding narrows that down to AirVPN and Windscribe, which is an unfortunately small set of choices.

      • Lad@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        What exactly does port forwarding do and why is it better for torrenting like I’ve heard? I’ve been using Mullvad for a couple of years now but if I could get faster torrent download speeds that would be great

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          ·
          3 days ago

          Port forwarding lets you connect with other hosts peer-to-peer which a VPN would otherwise block if both sides are behind one. For torrents you’d get more peers (which doesn’t matter if you’re just downloading the latest and most popular stuff) and be able to seed more effectively.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zipOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            And the way that many (most? (all?)) private trackers implement their monitoring kind of requires an open port.

            • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              Not all torrent sites require an open port. E.g. MAM works without an open port. It majorly impacts your ability to seed) but that isn’t a problem because of how much bonus points you get. TL does not either.

        • Nursery2787@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          One port must be open for a torrent connection to work.

          Down: open, Seed: Open = instant connection Down:closed, seed: open = connection takes a second to work Down open: seed closed = down has to wait for seed to renounce to trackers. A few minutes to an hour. Down closed: seed closed = no connection

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Just adding onto the good answer you already got, but the thing that made this click to me was understanding that if you’re not port forwarding, you’re limited in the connections you can make to other peers. Specifically, you can only connect to peers who are fully available. Whereas if you’re port forwarding, then you can connect both to people who are limited, and to people who are fully available.

          I imagine you would get faster download speeds if you were port forwarding, but my impression is that this mainly is a factor for seeding, which matters more if you’re on a private tracker that requires a certain download/upload ratio; it’s way harder to keep that ratio above 1.0 if you’re limited in the peers you can connect to.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      AirVPN

      I have been a happy customer with them. Not a fan of their GUI Client, but you’re not required to use it. Very easy to share access with friends too whenever they need it.

  • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Mullvad, IVPN and Nym (not tested with audits yet, do not trust as much as the other two).

    For clearnet browsing. PIA, AirVPN and Windscribe for torrenting. Windscribe and PIA are probably good for either but this is my classification, take it as you will

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree on this with the exception of PIA.

      • Marketing is BS like most VPN
      • Company is based in the USA
      • They do analytics
      • You cannot register “anonymously”

      It’s not the worst VPN you could choose but there is better options.

    • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I would not put Nym in the same category as Mullvad and IVPN. It is a new and immature product. I have not heard that they have passed any sort of audit, their claims about non-log policy have not been tested yet.

      Their infrastructure is decentralized only in name. In fact, they have the same problem as session, the cost of maintaining a server discourages decentralization so much that no one does that. As a result it nullifies any advantages their mixnet might offer, as chances are all your hops are between the servers of the same owner.

      • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, Nym is new. Their mixnet has a lot of similarities with TOR.

        What do you mean by “cost of maintaining a server”? I don’t think resource requirements are any different from TOR relays or exits.

        It is possible in theory but I assumed they weren’t lying when they said over 800 nodes exist in their network.

        Yeah maybe I should’ve put Nym as “of interest” rather than giving off the impression that it’s at the same level of reputation as Mullvad and IVPN

        • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          They do require to invest a certain amount of crypto to connect your node to blockchain. This in theory is done to prevent Sybil attacks.

            • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              TOR by design is vulnerable to Sybil attacks. In fact, there have been attempts to exploit this vulnerability “in the field”. It is not clear how successful they were. There are some measures taken to prevent such attacks, but none of them guarantee safety. I2p and other p2p networks also suffer from the same problem.

              In fact there is only one known way to mitigate Sybil (and alike) attacks. It is to expand the cost of operating in the network so much, that it would not be financially viable to perform it. There are two major way to achieve that: proof-of-work and proof-of-stake.

              PoW is what majority of cryptocurrencies do. To operate in the network you need to perform significant calculations. The more calculations you perform the “stronger” your position is. For that you have to invest huge amount of money in hardware and energy to “outperform” other actors. That is what mining basically is.

              PoS requires you instead to invest a crypto (or whatever, does not actually matter). The more crypto you invest “the bigger your ‘bank’ account is”, the “stronger” your position is as well. This is what nym and lokinet (technology behind session messenger) do.

              • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Thank you for the explanation. It would suck to put down money just to run a nym relay. I was interested in lokinet too but I wouldn’t want to spend more than a small VPS, really

  • Droolio@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Still using Private Internet Access (PIA).

    Honestly, dunno why they’ve fallen out of fashion due to the FUD about being owned by an unsavoury parent company, but the most important matter to me is if they keep logs, which they don’t. One of the few VPN companies tested on this, in court, and in a recent audit. Plus still extremely cheap (if you go for 3yr+3mo).

    Port forwarding works with with this docker NAS stack. Doesn’t use gluetun, but there’s a specialised docker-wireguard-pia container as part of the stack, with a script that handles port changes. Been flawless.

  • land@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you mainly do torrenting, AirVPN is a good option. I have recently moved away from ProtonVPN; it’s too expensive.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cryptostorm. Supports port forwarding, and you can buy access tokens through third parties using crypto. You do not register an account or provide them with any information to use the service, other than the token.

    But honestly, Proton is the best route to go.

  • upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’d say the proven good ones are Proton, Mullvad, and IVPN.

    Windscribe has really improved a lot and is worth considering. Still probably worth waiting for Freshscribe infrastructure before considering over the 3 I mentioned above.

    Nym and Obscura are up and comers worth looking at. Nym is a decentralized VPN and Obscura has partnered with Mullvad to offer a true double hop (ie one in where both hops are not owned by the same entity).

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      NYM is a next-generation mixnet with a VPN product built on top of it. Obscura is a VPN that provide a first hop then send traffic to a Mullvad hop.