• Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Human CPU originally, but the directors thought people were too stupid to know what that meant at the time (which might have been right, nobody I knew had a computer at that time) and changed the human brain neural network into “you’re all batteries actuallly”

      • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They didn’t even have to use the term, just say the machines use human brains to process data or something.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They could’ve dumbed down the CPU explanation into something as simple as “the human mind is creative enough to make connections robots can’t conceive of, so the machines need us to build new patterns to sustain the matrix” and that would’ve been enough. At least it wouldn’t violate the laws of thermodynamics.

        Also I heard it wasn’t the Wachowskis who wanted the change, but they got pressured from some suit who said it was too complicated.

    • wisely@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That makes way more sense. Whenever I watched it I always thought that there must be way more efficient sources of electricity.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It makes way, way more sense in my opinion.

        Humans are terrible batteries, but the processing power of our brain on the other hand is amazing.

        Based on the FLOPS (Floating point operations per second) today’s supercomputer powered by a nuclear power station does not match the processing power of a single brain, powered by a few potatoes.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It also makes the plot a bit more meta, where the simulation they’re all in is simulated using the brains of the people inside it.

          • cynar@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It even explains why the agents can jump between people. They are already running on their brains.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Even checks out on the allegorical level. The matrix is the capitalist system we’re stuck in.

          • Javi@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I think the point was more about the quantity of power required to achieve results, rather than the specific sources given. IE: you can run a brain on a few potatoes, but you can’t run a super computer on the same due to a lack of sufficient power output.

            Consequently you can’t really run a human brain on nuclear power either, though that’s probably due to radiation poisoning moreso than a lack of required power generated.

            • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              15 hours ago

              What if you use the nuclear plant to power grow lights in a hydroponic potato farm?

              • Javi@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I like it, if we can look to harness all of the potatoes processing power, which I’m sure alone is not much (but according to the physics in portal 2, is enough to power a minor AI instance), we can do away with both having to incubate and feed the pesky human processors as well as having to run a matrix at all. I presume a potato is content with its life regardless of manipulation.

                Would’ve made the films far less interesting though.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yea, that’s akin to a perpetual movement machine : you can’t get more out of the system than what you put in ! So the squid’s power grid would be in deficit. And they would have to borrow from GERMANY because THEY invested in renewables

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I mean, he didn’t really have either of those things.

    His boss at the office was tearing him a new asshole over being a few minutes late, and he definitely wouldn’t have gone to the club with those people he sold the virus to if he didn’t get that cryptic “follow the white rabbit” message.

    Of course, the solution to that problem was definitely not to follow Morpheus and Trinity into the real.

    • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      He also had gender dysphoria, if you listen to the subtext in Morpheus’ speech near the beginning

    • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You think the machines kept that deal they made with Cypher? The one about being rich and famous? They shoved him in as a homeless bum to save power

      • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Why wouldn’t they? I haven’t seen a reason why they wouldn’t keep it. They don’t need to lie and it’s just a change to coding for them. Not to get pro-machine, but during the animatrix they were honest and the humans were lying.

        As long as you don’t count keeping humans in a fake reality ‘lying’.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I disagree. Like, maybe cipher was right for cipher, but from an objective moral standpoint betraying your allies in order to eat steak and be fancy is considered a dick move.

      And dick moves are never right.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Cypher was the greedy guy who sacrificed everyone but himself to take the easy way out.