• kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    People can’t even handle a zip merge, da fuck we need flying cars for, lmao, another technobro invention that only thinks about the individual and not the wider effect on society

  • #!/usr/bin/woof@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And thus the reason we don’t have flying cars. That was two. Imagine the flaming hell that would be raining down if we had commute traffic numbers in the sky.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You need a fully automated and certified air traffic control first. That’s only been discussed for a free decades now so any time now it’ll arrive. Nah, nobody wants to put in any funding or take on the liability.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Now imagine hundreds of them populating the skies over a densely populated city, just to carry a few hundred rich people around.

    • ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      Cars travel on the ground. These are indeed massive drones with the capacity to lift humans. The media won’t give up “The Jetsons” flying car term (regardless of how impractical and unsafe the concept of layman operating in 3D space is). These are just electric, multi-rotor aircraft. My rant is over.