Damn, and you still have to provide only a partial context?
They literally said, “I’m employed,” so I gave a condensed version. If someone wants to read through all your drivel, they can read through the thread I linked. If they want your side of the story, they can ask you. This person asked me.
How about you share the parts where you relentlessly accuse me of being a Nazi?
I literally referenced that.
The part where you misconstrue what I’m saying and purposely fail to grasp my point?
I can’t link that part because it doesn’t exist and never happened.
The part where I actually fight back by falsely accusing you to prove my point, by using the same tactics you used to accuse me baselessly?
I wasn’t accusing you baselessly. I gave you my basis. You didn’t “prove your point” you just lobbed baseless nonsense to deflect from my valid criticisms.
… that benefited only you. Why don’t you include any of your own sins in there? Do you really think you’re a saint?
I literally referenced that.
Quote it like you did everything else. It doesn’t cost you a damn thing.
I can’t link that part because it doesn’t exist and never happened.
Oh, right, we’re still doing that bit, pretending we don’t understand basic analogies while trying to shove entire hypotheticals in people’s faces. Jfc, listen to yourself.
You didn’t “prove your point”
What point? Proving I’m not a Nazi? How about you prove that you’re not a pedo? The burden of proof falls on you to prove that I am. All you have are your stupid and loaded hypotheticals.
Oh, right, we’re still doing that bit, pretending we don’t understand basic analogies
Are you talking about the analogy where you compared a moral stance about genocide to a mere preference between liking pancakes or waffles? I understood that analogy perfectly, as well as how utterly monstrous it was to make.
The burden of proof falls on you to prove that I am.
I did.
All you have are your stupid and loaded hypotheticals.
It’s not my fault you don’t understand hypotheticals.
I understood that analogy perfectly, as well as how utterly monstrous it was to make.
I wish you had understood the one where I abstracted away the word “genocide” that you had fixated on so you could understand what my meta-comment was about. Or how you should’ve understood that you’re the type of person to interject with “but how can you hate waffles!” when someone says they like pancakes. Sounds to me like you didn’t understand anything at all.
I did.
Oh, and what’s this? Now you’re questioning whether I sound like a good person? Where’s the evil Nazi you were accusing me of being just a second ago, huh?
It’s not my fault you don’t understand hypotheticals.
It’s not my fault you make shitty and overloaded hypotheticals. Also, let me remind you that refusing to answer does not mean failing to understand. I simply side-stepped it, bucko.
They literally said, “I’m employed,” so I gave a condensed version. If someone wants to read through all your drivel, they can read through the thread I linked. If they want your side of the story, they can ask you. This person asked me.
I literally referenced that.
I can’t link that part because it doesn’t exist and never happened.
I wasn’t accusing you baselessly. I gave you my basis. You didn’t “prove your point” you just lobbed baseless nonsense to deflect from my valid criticisms.
… that benefited only you. Why don’t you include any of your own sins in there? Do you really think you’re a saint?
Quote it like you did everything else. It doesn’t cost you a damn thing.
Oh, right, we’re still doing that bit, pretending we don’t understand basic analogies while trying to shove entire hypotheticals in people’s faces. Jfc, listen to yourself.
What point? Proving I’m not a Nazi? How about you prove that you’re not a pedo? The burden of proof falls on you to prove that I am. All you have are your stupid and loaded hypotheticals.
Are you talking about the analogy where you compared a moral stance about genocide to a mere preference between liking pancakes or waffles? I understood that analogy perfectly, as well as how utterly monstrous it was to make.
I did.
It’s not my fault you don’t understand hypotheticals.
I wish you had understood the one where I abstracted away the word “genocide” that you had fixated on so you could understand what my meta-comment was about. Or how you should’ve understood that you’re the type of person to interject with “but how can you hate waffles!” when someone says they like pancakes. Sounds to me like you didn’t understand anything at all.
Oh, and what’s this? Now you’re questioning whether I sound like a good person? Where’s the evil Nazi you were accusing me of being just a second ago, huh?
It’s not my fault you make shitty and overloaded hypotheticals. Also, let me remind you that refusing to answer does not mean failing to understand. I simply side-stepped it, bucko.