Just for that, I’m putting soup into a bowl like this:
And so we’re on the same page, yes, I know a circular cross-section would hold more soup without requiring more surface area and therefore material. I’m doing it anyway.
Don’t even get me started on tesselation, space-filling and logistics, because I will make a bowl that constitutes an entire FTL shipment on It’s own, but somehow also only holds a single serving of soup.
Before you start whining about that, you should know, that while I don’t prefer it, I am fully willing to resort to non-euclidean geometries, too, so help me God.
You could have just left me to my little square soup bowl, but here we are. Perhaps peace was never an option.
I love when my bowl doubles as a shuriken.
Of course, one can’t just put a bouba liquid in a kiki container!
I hate that this makes so much fucking sense
I can see the logic. It’s made in a pot, eaten in a bowl, fairly liquid and remains liquid while stored.
And lasagna is a square/rectangular food.
But what about stew? My father makes a beef stew in the oven using a square casserole. The leftover is refrigerated in the same square casserole and the whole thing congeals into a square. So to me stew can be square.
If you’re making lasagne from scratch, it can definitely be round. It’s pretty much just a savory pasta cake.
What shape plates do you use for lazayn (that’s cool for lasagne)??
Trapezoid. It leaves spaces on either side of the square lasagne for wasabi and maple syrup.
Don’t forget the ramekins of ketchup and barbeque sauce for dipping!
The plate will be round but the lasagna stays square.
It’s because you have to use a spoon, I think.
Soup is liquid therefore it fills whatever vessel you force it to! laughs maniacally
Soup is not round.
Oat meal is round, but soup can be any shape. You could even have square soup or unicorn shaped soup.
Maybe I should make a unicorn bowl.
