• MyBrainHurts@piefed.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s because one of my three is a sporadically used tv that’s hooked up through my receiver system. Windows had trouble with it too and in more irritating ways. I just have to sit down and do some work to create a way to easily toggle between 1, 2 and 3 screen layouts/settings etc.

      • RedStamp@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I have a similar use case with my PC and TV. My PC is across the house from the TV and is connected via an HDMI over Ethernet KVM for when I want to use my PC as a gaming console.

        What I ended up doing was creating an automation in Home Assistant to turn on my KVM via a smart plug, then wake-on-lan my PC, and intiate a Steam Big Picture mode gamescope session. This was pretty tedious to get working all together, and startup time is pretty abysmal (around 1 minute to get fully into Steam), but it does actually work consistently.

        In case anyone is interested in replicating my setup: I’m running NixOS 25.11 with the Jovian flake installed, and launching my session via the systemd service run_gamescope. If you’re not on NixOS, you should still be able to build your own solution by emulating the Steam Deck startup services (honestly, it’s not that complicated), or looking into projects like ChimeraOS.

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I wound up using a physical switch that toggles a PC display off and toggles on the TV display so the system just slots it in. It only works because I don’t really need all three working at once (i.e. I just use the TV output to watch TV).

        But yeah, neither windows or Linux handles dynamic display changes very well.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I’d posit Linux is still far superior. Especially with stupid little things, like one of my displays acts like it’s fully disconnected when it’s powered off at night. Which then tells Windows to disconnect the screen and fuck up all my app positions regardless of wether, “remember window positions based on connected screens” or what ever is set. It takes many seconds for that asshole to reinitialize the whole fucking desktop, always with programs in the wrong fucking place. Every. Time.

          Linux doesn’t give a fuck, changes desktop layout instantly, doesn’t assume where I want my windows, and is by all accounts just far superior. I haven’t messed with this fresh install too much to know if there are weird little edge cases I’m not noticing, but so far, Linux is absolutely kicking Microsoft’s ass and taking its lunch money (I wish more than figuratively).

    • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I had issues with it back in 2022 when trying a few different distros. I had 3 monitors of all the same size and I had weird visual glitches when trying to use the ui to set refresh rate or resolution.

      Now though? Haven’t had any issues since i switched to Linux as my daily driver in 2024.

    • Jako302@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Good for you. I still can’t get Wayland to support more than one 144Hz display.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, you’ve got two problems to start with:

        1. You’re using Wayland
        2. You fell for the superhuman refresh rate hype
        • Jako302@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You’re using Wayland

          It works fine for everything else. Besides, X11 doesn’t even support two monitors with different refresh rates.

          You fell for the superhuman refresh rate hype

          And you fell for the good old “humans can only see in 35Hz”.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          While humans cannot see 144hz explicitly, persistence of vision does not work like a monitor. Your vision DOES see differences. You can still notice how ‘smooth’ motion is at higher frame rates, etc.

          That said, framerate isn’t the only stat that improves visual quality. Even wholly outside of color reproduction, having a monitor that supports blanking between frames (frame1, black, frame2, black, etc) can make even the same FPS ‘feel’ smoother and reduce ghosting and other effects from the panel.

          Also, there is a BIG advantage of fast panels for variable refresh rates. Even if your game can never run past 60fps, a panel that can push updates very fast generally has a far greater ability to hit the rendered framerate, ‘feels’ more responsive at the same framerate, and often has a greater range of FPS they can support. Basically… there are many good reasons FreeSync has multiple tiers.

          So basically… good job falling for ignorant dogma!

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          High FPS like 144 is noticeable in specific situations in specific games, mainly those with a lot of panning like fast paced FPS or racing games where things move quickly across the screen while the camera is also turning.