You must log in or register to comment.
Is this all true? Jesus Christ, this Epstein corruption spread everywhere.
I hate to be that person, is there a source for each bit of info? This is def something I’d like to come back to in future references.
Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I’ll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don’t even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.
Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.
Thanks for saying that! Was reading it and obviously not a fan of either named people, IMHO public death penalty should be brought back for preventing the course of justice! But wild accusations and click bait.
https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/edinburghs-jk-rowling-hits-back-33355200
Some news sources have picked it up.
She’s denying it, but Steve Bannon denied knowing anything, when he worked directly with Epstein on a propaganda piece to get people to forget that he was a child sex trafficker. Rowling also just had her super yacht removed from all marine traffic services, no AIS, no port logs, nothing.
But TLDR, numbers 1, 3, and 4 have just been found in the Epstein files.
The others are also verifiable.
JK Rowling’s bookshelf
I was too young and innocent to understand the evils of this world when I fell in love with the books. They were my escape in otherwise a shit childhood. I hate the author, but I cannot hate the stories that made my childhood better.
You’re allowed to look back fondly while being aware of the problems. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. Life is full of nuance.
Similarly, I enjoyed the movies even though the books weren’t my personal style. A whole lot of people were a part of that who don’t share any of her views or knew the type of person she was at the time.
Crucially, the invitation to JKR’s play came in 2018, when Epstein was already in jail. You have to be a special kind of dumb to still invite him to a public event at that point. Compared to that, Bill Clinton’s contacts in 2002-2003 have pretty decent plausible deniability - it’s at least possible that he didn’t know that Epstein was a pedo rapist + pedo pimp, since that was before any accusations against him became public.
Clinton knew. He had briefs from US intelligence, even after out of office, a practice the current president stopped as I understand, The best news service in the world.
Shoutout to when she made a character that gets mocked for wanting to end slavery and then cast a black woman to play her
Hermione Granger? But she’s not black… am I missing the joke somewhere?
Someone already explained, but the joke was mostly about the retroactive optics of two white teenage boys telling a black woman she’s being annoying about anti-slavery activism which… yeah
Huh, never knew. I always assumed it was Emma Watson who narrated it.
It was the original run of cursed child in London that she was Hermione
Don’t remind me of that work. Somehow the witch managed to produce a work rivalling the terribilit of her transphobia.
IIRC there are only a couple characters who have their ethnicity specified in the books. But it has been a while since I read them.
There’s a lot to be against here, but to me, that last one is especially bad
…,… theres no reason to beat peeps over the head with it.,… I don’t like this whole
told u sothing peeps like to do…,…imean- yea, preddi awful—obviously—
the potterheads sounds more like an insult in this context,.,…
Yeah I thought JK Rowling being a bigoted sac of shit was fairly well known so I just assume anyone who’s a fan of her works just doesn’t mind her bigotry and therefore aren’t really worth interacting with. But I suppose there’s people who learn new things every day.
Also, Potterheads is the self applied name for the fans.
This is why the post focuses on her connections to Epstein and white supremacists. They might not care about transphobia, but being an ally of Epstein is broadly seen as bad unless you’re a cultist or a pedophile.
The books and films meant a lot to a lot of people, and I can’t blame people for loving the world she created for them.
I don’t regret having read the books and seen the films. But I’m also done with her and will never give her money again.
The books message seems at odds with what she is now. I think her position on trans rights was challenged, and she dug in, and was attacked harder, and she joined those that supported her, and was thrown into extremism. That said it seem she was epstein friendly before all of this, so, wtf.
I like her work. It’s a pretty large part of my childhood. I very much oppose her views though and I will not pay for anything that benefits her financially.
I mean I also used to like libertarians and the church of Satan as a kid too
What has the church of Satan done other than be awesome?
You’re likely mixing up the church of Satan with the satanic temple. https://satanismtoday.net/articles/difference-between-church-of-satan-and-satanic-temple/
That’s very possible.
Yeah, I was a member of the church of Satan in highschool, now a member of The satanic Temple as an adult.
ohgosh thus is another one if those… topics where ur not allowed to be a centrist, hm? >v<
i feel its reasonably easy to not know about it…,… maybe that’s just me tho—
EDIT: okay fair… that was being too general, I honestly don’t even read the whole post image and just the header and went like sigh-here we go again… which still very much paints me in a bad light, but oh well im not gonna remove the comment so peeps can see how evil and nefarious I am
You can be centrist, it just means you support pedophiles.
sigh fair— in this case ye
I don’t think I understand what you mean by “be a centrist” on this topic.
iguess what I mean is this:
- on the one hand - damn - transphobia bad obviously, also supporting evil-doers is bad obviously too
- but also woa do we really have to pull these topics into media consumption too?.. havent we already declared that theres no moral consumption under capitalism or whatever?..
so like -… gosh, this exact thing happens to me a lot… where both sides make total sense to me, even if I am on “one side”… but acknowledging the “oponents” points is already a bad thing,…
i remember peeps bein really angry about that one potter game— and like… yeah. sure. makes sense to not play it. but like… ubisoft is well known for having common sexual abuse and stuff in their offices, but most peeps still play that companies games…,…,
i didnt play it.,… but I found the whole discussion weirdly inflated… but like, in this case, with Epstine… well thats obviously going way beyond a simple onion 🧅 and… obviously shouldnt be supported and stuff----
wow thats a long comment
:(
:(…,… ;( …,…,…,…
It must be exhausting interacting with 🇺🇲 peeps
hm, who r u referring to? >v<
im not merican…
