• Chulk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 minutes ago

    I’m really trying hard to see the point that’s being made. Is it just the “high” salaries, or is there some other implication? The OP seems to be insinuating that Signal is a honeypot or something. I am going to need a lot more proof than, “hey, these guys work at a non-profit and they aren’t underpaid!” Given that most tech jobs offer stock options in addition to normal salary, it would make sense that base salary should be higher at a non-profit (where stock options don’t exist). Their salary structure also seems much flatter than other non-profits that I saw within the propublica link.

    What am I missing here?

  • RykardNixon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t know the intricacies of signal as a company or if they support any bad actors or whatnot, but I do hate to see flack for non-profit leaders and employees getting paid competitive salaries. Like if people are actually worth that much in the economy, why not try to stack the team so they’re incentivized to do well? Especially in the shit pot that is America.

    I would be curious to see the spread of overhead between salaries and fundraising, outreach, etc to actually get their product out there. Because if those are balanced in favor toward actually running the business, marketing it well, and fundraising, I’d say these people more than deserve these salaries.

  • mistermodal@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    LMAO @ everyone who would have denied this was true groveling at the feet of the US government’s spectacularly abd inexplicably generous Open Technology Fund after devoting 3000 comments to bashing what remains of Firefox for [checks notes] making the UI better so the community doesn’t need to spend their time making sidebars and vertical tabs… You guys are worms. Today I get to be the rock. 🥴

  • phase@lemmy.8th.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And now let’s focus on the only player who is a bit transparent instead of asking how are the others…

    • mistermodal@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      adb is currently main developer for a fork of Delta Chat, a messenger that actually gives you privacy.

      you got your messenger recommendation from congresspeople. think about that for a second and how it makes you look to technically competent people like us

      • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 minutes ago

        Aw the mewling wittle baby is in love. I actually don’t use signal, but nice try. I do know a fair deal about the obscene income inequality and disparity in non-profits though.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 hours ago

    How does this compare to salaries for comparable positions at comparable for-profit companies?

    It’s kinda the point of donations that they can afford to hire people whose labor costs that much.

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “President of Signal getting paid less than a principal engineer” must be the take here.

    The same argument applies to Wikipedia: it’s a blessing these people accept working for <1M. They could easily get a job for triple the salary elsewhere but choose to forfeit it for principles.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just hire from the EU. It’s cheaper and they are as competent. A lot more money will be left to hire more staff. I’ve already moved my signal donation to matrix.

    The US is a money sink.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    not my circus, not my monkeys

    but them positions… as mr. cici famously quipped, that’s alot of buffers

    you really need a VP of eng and then a director of eng and further liaisons until you reach an actual engineer for a shop that has one product?

    again, what do I care, spend it in good health

  • albsen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    is the argument they shouldn’t be paid money for their work? or maybe signal shouldn’t be hiring at competitive salaries for highly skilled labor?

    • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, the only person on the list with “developer” in their title has the lowest salary, the executives are paid more. And you will not in a million years convince me that corporate suits are doing skilled work in a way to deserve more compensation than people actually making the product.

      • albsen@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        that’s a fair comment I don’t know what they do either.

        having seen a few of these org charts this could be much worse. there are 4 salaries related to software and technical improvements of the app and platform.

        most ppl underestimate what kind of infrastructure is required to make anything work at planet scale, including auxiliary functions. I’d be much more interested in where the funding is coming from.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well, the only person on the list with “developer” in their title has the lowest salary,

        Unsurprisingly.

  • lemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What would be the downside if all companies were non-profit? At first sight, it sounds like a great idea.

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The conventional answer is that there would be much less incentive to fund new ones.

      Some things need a large investment to start: power plants, cities, factories, space stations, etc. Sometimes more money than the people involved can afford, and you need to ask someone to front the money, they typically get paid with a share of the profits.

    • toofpic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Some companies will be invisible and/or “boring” - nobody ever said: “Oh, I just love my office building’s cleaning supplies delivery contractor, I should donate them again!”

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        To be fair non-profit doesn’t mean you can’t charge for your services. You just can’t pay profit out as dividends so there’s no incentive to overcharge.

  • Sims@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    US and the West are ‘managed’ by elite psychopaths that don’t give a shit about ordinary peoples ‘privacy’ or similar fancy tools for the wage-slaves. They have used these tools to try and break through specific nations/groups information defenses. ANYTHING sponsored by the US Oligarchy is either a part of local US control, or an attempt at reaching more people with rich-man propaganda in nations that defend themselves against US lies and color-revolutions…

  • glitzer_gadze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Unbearable: This was the last time i donated to signal. Next time i’ll donate to some small foss-projects.