okr765
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days ago

Are we just making up language rules as we go?

lemmy.world

message-square
123
link
fedilink
662

Are we just making up language rules as we go?

lemmy.world

The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 4 days ago
message-square
123
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • khánh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    almost always “able to be unlocked”. “not able to be locked” is usually “non-lockable” or “not lockable”.

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you can’t unlock it, is it really a lock?

  • Vegafjord - demcon@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    both, but not at the same time. words change meaning with context. thats why there often are several definitions of a single word.

  • EffortlessGrace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Are we just making up language rules as we go?

    Yes, throughout history, in fact.

    And to answer the meme’s question, it can have either definition based on the context of usage.

  • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Non-lockable feels like the right term.

    ‘Un-’ directly implies undoing, an action. ‘Non-’ implies a status, a non-possibility.

    That’s my two cents.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Illockable

  • Skymt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Both definitions refer to the same thing, right? A locked lock is unlockable. It cannot be locked further, AND it can be unlocked.

    Vice versa for the unlocked lock.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unconceivable.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 days ago

      You keep saying that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

  • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Depends on the cawntex

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. Language can be funny like that. You are either modifying the adjective “lockable” with the prefix “un-”, or you are modifying the verb “unlock” into an adjective by adding “-able” at the end. Words can have multiple definitions, yay!

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Unlock-able versus un-lockable

    • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s mental bracketing for you.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        TIL the thing I do when I’m trying to understand an ambiguous sentence has a name

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        XKCD #37

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Unlockable ass-lock

        • troglodytis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is that ass on lock for being unlockable, or is that lock ass for being unlockable?

  • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sokath, his eyes uncoverable.

  • Orangenkuchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Redminds of the German “umfahren” (run over) which is the exact opposit of “umfahren” (drive around). (First is pronounced with a tiny pause after the second letter; the other is not.)

    • Chaf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Even better is “Haare wachsen lassen”. One meaning is letting your hair grow, the other is waxing your hair. Pronounced exactly the same

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Locks should always be able to be reversed. Locking something is restricting access, not denying it entirely. You don’t weld a door shut and call it locked.

    Poe didn’t write a tale about Fortunato being locked downstairs.

    “Sealed”, “buried”, “entombed”, “immured” - all perfectly good terms for closing access to something with the intent of the closure being permanent.

  • wieson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can we discern via stress?
    UNlockable - can be opened.
    unLOCKable - cannot be locked

  • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    The issue is the fact that the opposite action of locking is called unlocking and not something like delocking.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Curse you! 🙃

memes@lemmy.world

memes@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.world

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

  • !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
  • !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
  • !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
  • !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.33K users / day
  • 7.91K users / week
  • 13K users / month
  • 21.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 22.3K subscribers
  • 9.66K Posts
  • 265K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • BE: 0.19.18
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org