• Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My ideal scenario:

    • The AI bubble lasts a little bit longer, they put data centers in space.

    • The bubble pops immediately after this, all the companies go broke and nobody maintains the satellites.

    • Free PC components rain from the skies, I sit out on the roof surrounded by buckets catching RAM and SSDs.

    • They’re a bit scorched but I’ll take what I can get.

  • MasutaHarada@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not even people there want to support this cray-cray ai trend no more, they just ahead of the curve huh.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Shh, you’ll ruin the tech CEO’s self delusions. They need that AI to forget about their past boondoggles. Like the metaverse and NFTs.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Probably not any time soon? China’s buying 5090s in bulk to literally remove the chips and transplant them onto server form factor boards for AI.

      The stocks crashed because there’s so much competition now and nobody can expect to take the whole market. Deepseek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi are ALL way cheaper than the US counterparts and quite comparable. It’s not exciting anymore. When Deepseek R1 came out, everyone thought that Deepseek was going to completely take everything over. Now pretty much everyone is getting close to Claude in performance.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Never. Western capitalists will make Chinese hardware illegal before they allow cheaper goods to undercut their profits. It’s exactly what they’re doing in the auto industry, why should tech be different?

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The only country that might do that is the us. There are many western capitalists happy to buy from a competitive global market.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s… that’s not how this works. That’s not how any of this works.

      Mild discounts, yes. Cheap again? No.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m beginning to suspect never. The industry (read nvidia) got taste for selling stuff in bulk to those who don’t care about price and/or quality. They don’t want to return to the world where regular people (ew) were their primary source of income. They will find new scam to use their cards on.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oh you sweet summer child. Do you actually think the price of GPUs are going to come down?!?

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You can buy a 16gb v100 in a pcie card for under 400usd or just the gpu for 220usd, unfortunately the price jumps 3x minimum if you want a 32gb version

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          17 hours ago

          You can buy a 16gb v100

          no thanks, I’d prefer a GPU that can actually process graphics AND DISPLAY THEM…

          • TBi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Do these support Optimus to redirect the video output? Could be an option if it’s cheap enough.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              nah, I don’t want to eat the leftovers of nvidia’s AI slop machine, I want a gpu that’s for graphics the WAY GOD INTENDED

          • 0x0@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I guess you could buy a bc250 or a gameboy if thats important for you, but i doubt theyll show up as a result of chinas datacenter failing so youll just have to wait even more then

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I’d prefer a gpu meant to drive displays because my friends aren’t LLMs and all this absurd garbage has made it impossible to buy 5090s without a mortgage.

              I’d wager the people asking for cheap GPUs above want them for the same.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Can we all just agree China and USA bad? I swear lemmy is such a china propaganda machine lately let’s not forget all the horrors of China in the very recent past.

    • standarduser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think capitalism is bad because state capitalism (China) or corporate capitalism (USA) both end up being propaganda

    • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sure, one country has issues with surveillance and free speech, and the other just started another illegal war of agresssion by triple tapping an elementary school and killing 200 little girls.

      They’re both pretty bad.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “has issues” is carrying a lot of weight. We really didn’t know how bad the Nazi concentration camps were until they Allied forced to to them. We really don’t know how bad China or the US are treating their “undesirables.” There’s nothing to gain by taking one side over another. They’re both invaded and/or are planning invasion of their neighbors. They’re both supplying nations committing genocides. They’re both digital surveillance states with propaganda campaigns.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This literally down plays the atrocities committed by America on the daily due to some assumed evil being perpetrated by a country that hasn’t dropped a bomb in 50 years.

          Find a better source than your imagination.

        • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It literally is. They have protections baked into the law and were excused from the one child policy, lol.

            • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You paying for my ticket? Unlike the genocide in Gaza, you and I or any number of international journalists can go check it out for ourselves in Xinjiang, lol.

              • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                38 minutes ago

                Well I’ve actually been to China. Worked there for a bit, tho TBF it was a long time ago. I’ve spent time in a bunch of SE Asia countries. Sometimes travelling, usually working my way round and staying in one place long enough to get to know the town, the locals, learn a bit of the language, form friendships, the occasional relationship. Probably only 5 years total in Asia tho, which I’ll admit isn’t enough to be an expert. Did the same in some European countries - mostly Spain and France, tho a brief bit of Italy too. I don’t really have any contacts left in China but I’ve got mates in Thailand I hope to see again, and Vietnam. Also Cambodia, tho that can be a bit sketchy. Mind you, anywhere can be sketchy if you’re more curious than careful. And just to head you off - no, I’m not rich. In fact I’m borderline homeless. All you really need to do is raise the price of the flight, organise visas, try to find a job or a place to stay before you set off. It’s very doable for anyone who wants to try. So, no, I’m not paying for your ticket. Pay your own fuckin way and stop letting your opinions be governed by your lack of experience. You can do this if you put your mind to it, I did, and I’m not the smartest or strongest or whatever. You just have to do it.

                Edit - thanks for the meme, that means a lot.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree with that. Lots of China meat riding here, absolute refusal to acknowledge the problems and deny everything by saying “your source is made up usa propaganda” no matter what source you post. It’s kinda funny cuz trumpers do the same thing (fake news).

      Which is wild cuz i was under the impression communism was all about giving and receiving criticism and struggling thru to an answer. But maybe that’s just the authoritarian side of China that crushes any kind of critique.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I thought libs were all about supporting the lesser evil? Or is it only minorities that you demand be utterly pure?

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Nah, libs are more about calling out evil, greater and lesser both. And minorities aren’t inherently pure, they get called out too if they do heinous shit. It’s not so much about taking a side, more about trying to be a decent human being and encouraging others to do the same. It’s just that the American electoral system requires people to choose between a turd burger or a salad with a shit on the side.

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            Where did I say that? I absolutely have a problem with it, this is why the American political system is so fucked. Shouldn’t have to choose between shit and shittier. The fuck happened to ‘the will of the people’?

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              44 minutes ago

              I assumed that “It’s just that the American electoral system requires people to choose between a turd burger or a salad with a shit on the side” meant that you should choose one or the other, which to me means accepting the lesser evil.

        • korazail@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          We can choose a salad (or burger) without shit… but not next week at this point. Gotta pick one - or let others pick one for you.

          Afterwards, please find your local precinct and be part of the discussion. “Both parties” have been captured by money/capital, but only because we let them. At least on the dem side, the rules we have allow us to outnumber the money, but only if we show up on November 4th.

          • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Which war was that? And are you sure they were ‘libs’? Because the American democrat party sure ain’t. They’re conservatives.

                • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 minutes ago

                  That term is tricky in the United States, because conservatives use it to mean anybody to the left of center while self-described “liberals” have a lot of smoke for the left but only make excuses for the right.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    some context, first of all, the -40% collapse only brought the STAR50 index back to its March 2026 levels.

    and the Chinese stock market is heavily moderated by the government which is very different from the US market. if the stock rallies too quickly, the government generally speaking will try to slow it down. Sometimes through explicit policies 1, sometimes through a kind of “scare tactic” 2. Conversely, when the stock drops too sharply, the government also intervenes to prop it up 3. Honestly I feel more countries should do the same.

    The Chinese stock market is also much smaller relative to its GDP (101.5%) compared to the US (227%) 4. All this is to say, if you look at China and think, “huh, their AI bubble burst and they still seem to be fine?”, think again. If and when the AI bubble bursts for the US, it’s going to be much much worse.

    • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      They did beat America in the race towards oppressive authoritarianism, but under Trump, the U.S. has caught up a great deal. So much winning!

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          So the latter two are fairly easily explainable by racism and homophobia and are actually easier to avoid if you don’t have a democracy. China’s done well, they not had a real refugee crisis lately and don’t have too many black people to hate (they DO still be hella racist over there, somehow Africans were even at fault for COVID according to some Chinese officials).

          There was a huge social media outcry about refugees in much of Europe about a decade ago that the conservatives kept milking for a long, long time. Then they’ll claim black men are rapists and take the one example that keeps doing it again every time he gets out of jail as if that’s representative of every African. Then the outcry about LGBT people trying to groom your kids and whtaever. This is all for conservatives to get votes. They get almost half a country thinking that the damn librul communist (yes, they consider those to be the same thing, I’m not even going to get into that) government is out to erase straight white people… In a country with 10 black people and 5 muslims (okay, I’m exaggerating, but there REALLY aren’t a lot of them here, whereas the conservatives will tell you that they’re completely taking over and they’re all getting billions from the government in aid and whatnot)

          If the people don’t actually have a choice (like in China, where there’s literally only one party allowed), there’s no need for manufactured outrage about foreigners. Which is great because then there’s less hate, but it also means you literally don’t get to choose the political ideals of the people who govern you. If you have a bad faith opposition party to worry about, they will make up shit to get into power.

          TL;DR: Completely subdue your people politically so there’s no competition, then there’s no manufactured outrage, then people won’t think literally all their tax money is going to a single refugee center that in reality holds 10 families.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Liking the government doesn’t imply having a democracy, though. And also thinking that you have a democratic country doesn’t mean that you do live in one

              It’s not that China bad, it’s more that China is good at creating great conditions for a majority of their citizens, but this doesn’t imply that it’s heaven on earth, still

                • PoliteDudeInTheMood@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  There’s a difference between propaganda and selectively presented facts.

                  The first graphic is misleading because it compares US war spending with Chinese infrastructure spending while ignoring American infrastructure investment and Chinese military spending. It’s a false comparison.

                  The second graph is from the legitimate Democracy Perception Index 2024. The numbers aren’t fabricated, but they measure how democratic people think their country is, not how democratic it actually is.

      • FrogCat@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oppressive authoritarianism? But tankies told me that China is a place of unbridled liberty. A land of milk and honey. Unlike the evil West which is always horrible and terrible.

        • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I mean… Can Chinese people vote out the current party and pick something else?

          Yes? No? No. How the fuck is it a democracy then.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Given the exponentially oversized influence that rich capitalists have on politics everywhere that is not socialist, it is evidently more democratic to not allow them to participate in politics at all.

            You know, governance of the people, by the people, and all that.

          • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            So then you’d concede Ukraine is not democratic since they can’t vote out Zelenskyy, right?

            The point here being - democracy isn’t just “the presence of multiple political parties”.

        • LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          So people in a nation where disagreeing with leadership is punished all agree with leadership. Interesting…

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          83
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          People who have never experienced democracy and have only been fed lies by their authoritarian government think their country is democratic and equal. Shocker.

            • redballooon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              21 hours ago

              To some extent… But in the USA until recently people never had reason to fear speaking out against their government.

              • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                27
                ·
                17 hours ago

                To some extent… But in the USA until recently people never had reason to fear speaking out against their government.

                Which people? The FBI killed Black Panther organizer Fred Hampton in his bed, back in the 60s.

                The Red Scare was a decade before that.

                And the back in the 1930s, The Bonus Army, a movement of World War 1 veterans demanding payment for their service from the government, was violently crushed by the united States military.

          • belochka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            There’s also been a certain “Soviet democracy”, the democracy perception of which in the polls would be sky high especially under dear Stalin and Voroshilov leading it with iron hand, and less when dissent stopped getting you executed.

          • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            1 day ago

            So then why did Russians in the same study claim abysmal democracy? Aren’t they afraid of the KGB?

            • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              The Russian psyche is one of pessimistic resignation. Its also true that Russia has never experienced free democracy. There are many who believe the fall of the USSR was a terrible thing and they blame “democracy” for their current circumstances. This is part of why Putin gets away with authoritarianism.

              • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                The American psyche must be fat as fuck and dripping with the blood of the innocent, if we’re generalizing.

              • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Non sequitur that has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of the graph.

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m sure you’ll get similar results if you ask people in North Korea.

          • nullspace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s really funny to me seeing someone using a chart showcasing oppressive authoritarianism a gotcha against an accusation of oppressive authoritarianism.

            • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You don’t think it has anything to do with the fact that China lifted 800,000,000 people out of poverty in 40 years?

              Or that over 90% of Chinese adults own their own home?

            • psycholocomotor_no2@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Your belief that China is an authoritarian oppressive regime seems to be unfalsifiable. If approval ratings are high it’s because the people are being silenced and secretly hate their government. If approval is low it’s because they hate their government. If the approval ratings are real then they’ve been brainwashed by nationalism.

              Like everything indicates the approval ratings are real, there were studies conducted by Western universities that didn’t have stake in the matter and most Chinese citizens had a positive opinion of the PRC. There’s no way to fake this kind of stuff as well as you’re describing for decades.

              There are various reasons for why I can understand Chinese citizens like China. They’re entering the golden age of their economy right now and legitimately have competitive quality of life when compared to Americans. Their country is becoming a superpower and that could be a source of national pride for some Chinese citizens. I think those reasons can explain the results without adding in coercion.

              • nialv7@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Your belief that China is an authoritarian oppressive regime is unfalsifiable.

                you are taking a logical leap here. it’s more accurate to say my belief that China is an authoritarian oppressive regime is not falsifiable by a public opinion poll. there are plenty other options that may falsify it.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Using personal opinion of crowds is notoriously very bad and people are easily misguided. ALL this says is the Chinese BELIEVE they’re democratic and all equal. Not that they actually are.

          • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re right, and I see that opinion poll as a indicator of the direction that America has been going: a place where many people think they are in a democracy, while actually living in a country that is more authoritarian than it was in the past.

          • adr1an@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Also, westerners like myself tend to complain about trump/etc without acknowledging the continuum of raising fascism. We should focus on the lies we have been fed, it’s not easy, nor late ;)

        • redballooon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Perception is a tricky business.

          But you are not posting this to talk about the perception, instead to suggest that there somehow is democracy in a state where only one party is allowed to exist.

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Chinese who don’t say these opinions are labeled a dissonant and oppressed by their government. Just like how elections are completely staged in dictatorships.

          This graph is completely useless.

        • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          These are great proof of China’s superiority! Until you see the Chinese questionnaires:

          Choose an option:
          [ ] My government serves the people
          [ ] I want my social credit score to take a nosedive. No more bank loans, government permits, study or career opportunities for me, please!

          • kossa@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Check up on the social credit score

            There have been widespread misconceptions in media reports about a unified social credit “score” based on individuals’ behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low or rewards if the score is high.

            • redballooon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              The social credit system is a broad governance strategy to track businesses, individuals, and government institutions and enhance their perceived trustworthiness rather than a single system

              Awesome, just a broad strategy, not yet a single unified system. There’s still a chance to escape specific punishments.

                • redballooon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Dude what’s the point of a system that enforces behavior when there’s no punishment?

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    China tech stocks are back to March this year, and AI stocks are still almost half their stock index.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Interesting. I think this is the first time I’ve seen the word “bubble” explicitly acknowledged as a reality and not a question in a headline of a major news outlet.

    So I searched for '“bubble” in the past month from Reuters, and found several headlines raising the concern, but none actually using the word “bubble”, with the exception of one investors meeting in Singapore.

    It seems that editors don’t want to scare/anger Western investors with the truth, but the Asia news desk under no such burden.

  • Fallibilist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems to have more to do with China than AI per-se considering that TSMC, Samsung and SK Hynix are unaffected.