• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I mean if your company is owned or adminstrated by an epstein associate they should be forced to put up a sign and register as a sex offender (corporations are people, after all).

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yet the PO(TU)S has put sanctions on judges in Europe for issuing arrest warrants on Netanyathu.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I want to announce that everyone in the Epstein files is banned from my house, with the exception of Bill Gates, who was already banned and is now double banned.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Don’t you hate it when a good boycott comes along, and you can’t participate because you’ve already been boycotting them for some previous atrocity? I keep finding good reasons to boycott United, but I’ve been boycotting them for decades.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      How stunning and brave of you to stand up for what is right.

      Clearly those in the files will feel the hot wrath of justice by not being able to ever go over to your place for Hot Pockets and Capri Suns.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ll have you know my homemade hummus and baba ganoush platter is the talk of the neighborhood.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Real glad I’m not in the Epstein files right now. I don’t think I could handle missing out on homemade baba ganoush. I’ll pick up some shawarma and be right over

          • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            You make them like normal but add more allspice than you’d think is reasonable. And a bit of smoked paprika on the ganoush. And don’t skimp on the olive oil. I’m talking

            Also, broil the eggplants after they’re done, before you scoop the goodness out (you can also barbeque them). And don’t blend them, you want that weird texture.

            Serve with pita and little boats of celery, carrots. bell pepper, onion, whatever you want that is crunchy and can scoop globs of them

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If yall been having people mentioned in the files visiting your house then I got a lot of questions for you that I didn’t have before reading this.

    • skozzii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I never thought I would see pedophilia become a political issue.

      The MAGA cult is real.

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My online friend lists have been through the chopping block recently, a good society must have intolerance for the intolerant and devious.

      There’s zero excuse for an adult to sexually assault a child, or to have known and kept the secret.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        not everyone who ever interacted with Epstein was/is a pedophile.

        he had a broad network of various levels of social gatherings and sex parties. not all of them were pedo parties. the majority were not.

        the notion that anyone who ever interacted with him in anyway is a pedophile or pedophile supporter is an incredibly broad and stupid approach. there are various levels of participation and interact with him. he clearly had an inner circle, an outer circle, and then 10000s of tangential connections with various people. hopefully with more disclosure of the files who is who will become apparent.

        punish the guilty who committed crimes. not their associates. guilt by association is cognitive bias that seeks to punish innocent people for merely being in proximity to those who commit crimes.

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Epstein’s behavior was publicly well-known long before his initial arrest. I remember my first thought was “Finally, what took them so long?”

          Anyone who had ANY contact with him after his 2008 conviction, who pursued any kind of relationship with him - personal, business, friendship, networking, sex client, etc. - is burned. They knew who he was, and any reasonable, moral person, especially one with public responsibilities, should have know to avoid any contact, of any kind.

          There was no valid reason for having a personal relationship with Epstein after 2008, and anyone who did, deserves all the public derision and contempt they receive.

        • WraithGear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          innocent before proven guilty is only a thing where the crime is actually being investigated. because it’s not, nearly any actions and considerations by individuals is fair game. technically it always was.

        • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This is a fair take, and I greatly prefer an “innocent before proven guilty” justice system. I think it’s also fair for you to read the article before commenting.

          The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology released a notice to members last week, cautioning that inclusion in the Epstein files does not alone imply misconduct.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            And who is going to determine what misconduct is? They have a crack team of legal experts reading all the files? devil is in the details.

            the issue I’m addressing is the broader moral panic and the moral grandstanding that goes along with it that surrounds this whole thing, and pedophilia in general, or that these types of symbolic gestures are some form of justice for the crimes of Epstein and his trafficking associates.

            • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I don’t really think it’s up to DinoCon to solve crimes. Obviously symbolic gestures aren’t justice, but I don’t really see what else DinoCon is supposed to do. Are you honestly asking DinoCon to spin up a crack team of legal experts to manage the epstein case? Maybe we should have GenCon start tracking down serial killers while we’re at it.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 minutes ago

                Professionally speaking? They should privately dis-invite the speakers or seminar leaders who make questionable appearances in the files, but not make a public hoopla over it. They probably have a ethics of conduct code that might have been demonstrably violated.

                But I have no idea what criteria they would be using to make those calls. For all we know maybe they have no codified ethics codes as an organization.

                My beef with it is the virtue signalling publicity. Making a big public stink about benefits who exactly? It’s little more than grandstanding moralizing PR.

        • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I mean, yes, but also, in the OP statement “after his conviction.”

          As in, after we knew what he was doing, why would peoppe ever associate with him again.

          Its not even some weird ass “gray area” thing where you are an 18 year old in HS dating a 16 year old at your HS. Its literally sex trafficking of very minor minors.

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That is commendable.
    Genuinely curious if they had the same resolve when it comes to the genociders and those affiliated with them.

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What if you’re not sure all this passionate witch-hunting is a good thing? Is that allowed?

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Excuse me? Witch hunts were fueled by religious superstition. People were hanged, burned, drowned for being things that don’t exist in the real world, and bedding a fallen angel for magical powers. Tell me how the fuck this correlates. Aside from Epstein and Trump being the fucking Devil.

        • Etterra@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s banning sunshine from a convention, not throwing them in prison. That’s not witch hunting, that’s something every convention does with problematic guests. Conventions are held by organizations and businesses - they have just as much right to kick and ban people as any other org or business. Nobody’s being hurt, persecuted, or prosecuted. Your argument is invalid.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Last I checked people being associated with others who have raped, mutilated, and killed children for little more than a power grab also makes you a horrible person by association.

          • presoak@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            7 hours ago

            There are many levels of association.

            For example, I might be invited to a conference. And I might decline that invitation. There now we’re associated by those emails. Am I a horrible person now?

            • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              4 hours ago

              If that was an argument such people could make, they’re welcome to present evidence.

              However, anyone who voluntarily associated with the world’s worst pedophile after his conviction has no excuse. Comparing people to the company they keep has been valid since the beginning of time.

                • village604@adultswim.fan
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  They answered. If you have evidence that you declined, then no.

                  From the wording I’m willing to bet they did a bit more investigation than just doing a pass/fail on a Ctrl+f

            • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              For example, I might be invited to a conference. And I might decline that invitation. There now we’re associated by those emails. Am I a horrible person now?

              Did you reach out to ask to be invited? Or did you receive an invite and decline it. Because we’re talking about the former. We’re talking about people who reached out to Epstein or his associates. They were in contact with.

              So yes, that would make you a horrible person, especially after the allegations came out. And you’re a horrible person for doing your absolute damndest to defend these people.

              You got banned from Dinocon, didn’t you.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Ditto. Specially because they’re focusing on the executives of those organisations, i.e. the people with actual decision power. That’s the right way to do it.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He did get his start in education. Given a job he was unqualified for by [traitorous] former AG Bill Barr’s father (who also wrote creepy pedo sci fi novels)

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      18 hours ago

      When you’re a global criminal organization, you ensure immunity by blackmailing and/or extorting every single person in a position of power as much as possible. There’s a reason these monsters have gotten away with it–and continue to get away with it–for so damn long

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Also, if you’re someone who is seeking power, you do everything you can to suck up to people with it. There are plenty of people in every field who are willing to put up with, or do, horrible things to be treated like they’re special.

    • osanna@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      pretty much. Basically everyone who is of note is implicated in the files. It’s ridiculous

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Ha, that will be the day. I bet dnc figures are on the list and redacted from what the justice department released for reasons that may include them knowing information on the president and his favorites themselves that they could release in retaliation for letting the information on them through.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    That motherfucker ruined tarnished dinosaurs too!? edit, i still like dinosaurs.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Fuck you, stop giving him power he doesn’t have.

      He didn’t ruin or tarnish all of paleontology. He can’t.

      Jesus Christ you fucking people.

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That fucker ruined Linguistics too — he was in friendly terms with Noam Chomsky.

      Personally I am not aware on how much Chomsky should be blamed for this association; it’s possible Epstein was simply using him. But even in the hypothesis Chomsky is innocent, it stinks.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah.

          At the very least we can safely blame him for not doing basic due diligence: even a hypothetically honest “I didn’t know” shows disregard for the victims of his “associate”. It’s already morally awful, even if [AFAIK] it wouldn’t be illegal in USA. [Would it?]

          There’s also the possibility he actually knew about it, but didn’t act on it. Morally speaking that would be even worse than the above, and [again, AFAIK] already a crime (omission).

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When Chomsky was asked what he corresponded with epstein about years ago, he said essentially “none of your fucking business”.

        Which is such a bad answer, I am half inclined to believe he just wanted help filing his taxes and a guilty Chomsky would have the sense to lie.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I am half inclined to believe he just wanted help filing his taxes and a guilty Chomsky would have the sense to lie.

          Yup, that sounds like him. He isn’t above bullshitting but not bothering to bullshit hints he believed he had nothing to hide.

          I guess he’s still in the “when in doubt, treat them as innocent” category for me.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That sounds like Chomsky? Doing the taxes of an uber wealth financier/convicted pedophile?

            Stop lying to yourself.

            • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              That sounds like Chomsky? Doing the taxes of an uber wealth financier/convicted pedophile?

              The inverse: the über rich paedophile doing Chomsky’s taxes. Get things right if you want to screech dammit.

              Plus Chomsky being smart+shitty enough to bullshit when in trouble, instead of saying “none of your business”. If Chomsky did the later instead of the former, it’s a sign he didn’t see any need to bullshit.

              Stop lying to yourself.

              A person lying to oneself would not say “when in doubt”. Or to “not [be] aware on how much Chomsky should be blamed”. Or talk about the “hypothesis” he is innocent. They’d be vomiting certainty: “Chomsky is [innocent|guilty] lol”.

              Instead, a person lying to oneself would be vomiting certainty like an assumer, re-eating their own vomit, and expecting others to eat it too.

              So perhaps the one being a liar (or worse, an assumer) here is not me.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Sure thing, buddy. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

                We all knew who Epstein was by that point. He should know better.

                How self deluded do you need to be in order to convince yourself that Chomsky reached out to the most notorious convicted pedophile in American history for some help with his taxes?

                I mean, Jesus Christ dude… It’s like you NEED this to be true.

                • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Sure thing, buddy. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

                  …since you’re insistently lying (yes) about what I need: I don’t “need” him to be innocent, and I don’t “need” him to be guilty. From my PoV he’s simply some old guy, with a bunch of hypotheses that range from “this is interesting” to “nah, bollocks”, always backpedalling when proved wrong. That’s it.

                  Is this clear?

                  (Also take a clue from the fact I was the one bringing him up, even if the thread is about the DinoCon.)

                  We all knew who Epstein was by that point. He should know better.

                  Yes, and? Myself said so in another comment dammit. The question here is how much he should be blamed. Should we blame him for:

                  1. Abusing some children himself?
                  2. Not abusing them, but actively helping Epstein to do so, in matters directly related to the abuse?
                  3. Not directly helping Epstein with the abuse, but knowing to be associated with a paedophile, and not giving a fuck about it?
                  4. Not knowing he was associated with a paedophile, but being in a position he should have done so?
                  5. Nothing?

                  Are you getting the picture? It’s a fucking gradient of shit. Both #1 and #5 are likely bollocks; but from #2 to #4 it’s all “maybe”. We don’t know what he did, and we don’t know what he knows.

                  And before some muppet says “but you said «I guess he’s still in the “when in doubt, treat them as innocent” category for me.»!!!”: I was clearly talking about what I formalised as #3. This is bloody obvious by context dammit, check the comment I was answering to!

                  How self deluded do you need to be in order to convince yourself that Chomsky reached out to the most notorious convicted pedophile in American history for some help with his taxes?

                  That is not even remotely close to what I said.

                  You don’t even know what you’re screeching at.

                  At this rate it’s safe to ignore you as dead weight and a noise. Feel free to keep screeching at your own assumptions, as if you were screeching at what I said, but don’t expect me to read it.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sadly there’s a lot of intelectuals that were involved, Lawrence Krauss, Noem Chomsky, Steven Hawking just scratching the surface.

  • presoak@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    No, I’m not defending Epstein. Fuck that guy and all his cronies. But you guys are being played like a piano.

      • presoak@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You have literally gone from persecuting child rapists to persecuting people who might be child rapists to people who might be associated with people who might be child rapists. You’re literally persecuting paleontologists. That’s insane.

        If I was going to fuck up a society or make a big distraction this is probably how I do it.

        Hook them with the worst thing in the world. Get them pointing fingers at each other. And while they’re distracted, fuck with Greenland or something