Do rich people think anyone who regularly interacts with them is automatically a servant?
get me a real robot (not one piloted by some poor dude in India) that can work a job, pay rent, plus not need a room ( ok maybe a closest for charging) and i might consider it.
But who makes your
slave’sroommate’s bed?Huh. Maybe he is a noble from Oxford in the 1600s, where one could employ one’s roommate as a servant, allowing the slightly lower classes to access education.
Wtf even is the “need a roommate” argument in the context of making your bed?? I couldn’t even get my damn roommate to clean his own fkn dishes let alone ask someone to make my bed for me lol
You don’t understand, you’re the roommate that would be replaced by the robot.
The last time this was posted, I think I recall someone saying this is a translation flub rather than what this guy actually means.
But it is funny to imagine he thinks a roomate is like when Baron Ünderbheit went to college.
Rich people talk to themselves in the mirror because no one actually cares about them, so a clanker is perfect for them.
It’s one bed making robot Micheal. How much can it cost, $10?
I still cant fathom what this guy even means. What does it have to do with owning a diet slave machine?
Maybe he can only imagine someone would live with him if they got paid to work for him?
this man has never even imagined being held.
Now he won’t have to!
I think you put an “need a” and “argument” too much in there





