- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
Google says a new AI tool on its search engine will rejuvenate the internet. Others predict an apocalypse for websites. One thing is clear: the current chapter of online history is careening towards its end. Welcome to the “machine web”.
The web is built on a simple bargain – websites let search engines like Google slurp up their content, free of charge, and Google Search sends people to websites in exchange, where they buy things and look at adverts. That’s how most sites make money.
An estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines and about 90% of searches happen on Google. If the internet is a garden, Google is the Sun that lets the flowers grow.
This arrangement held strong for decades, but a seemingly minor change has some convinced that the system is crumbling. You’ll soon see a new AI tool on Google Search. You may find it very useful. But if critics’ predictions come true, it will also have seismic consequences for the internet. They paint a picture where quality information could grow scarcer online and large numbers of people might lose their jobs. Optimists say instead this could improve the web’s business model and expand opportunities to find great content. But, for better or worse, your digital experiences may never be the same again.
On 20 May 2025, Google’s chief executive Sundar Pichai walked on stage at the company’s annual developer conference. It’s been a year since the launch of AI Overviews, the AI-generated responses you’ve probably seen at the top of Google Search results. Now, Pichai said, Google is going further. “For those who want an end-to-end AI Search experience, we are introducing an all-new AI Mode,” he said. “It’s a total reimagining of Search.”
You might be sceptical after years of AI hype, but this, for once, is the real deal.
You must log in or register to comment.
Google is about to become AOL. 😂 The walled garden is going to get destroyed by the open web, again.
Ads already destroyed the web. Developers wanting to make web apps instead of web pages already destroyed the web. Google is trying to prop up the corpse of its dead brand by capturing people in their chat bot.
I have friends working on ways for content providers to charge AI training models. But I have a feeling that’s not enough.
The future will have to be where creators have an incentive to consistently create, and consumers pay for what they like, or services to keep them informed and entertained without them having to do much.
In between will sit middlemen and aggregators to enable a smooth flow. Who that will be and what they do in this next phase is the big question.
Under the current method, Google’s search and ads groups are competing against each other. Don’t see that going well for anyone.
This is Google’s attempt at staying relevant now that it’s search engine is far from being the best and people are getting their information from TikTok and other sources. Their AI is garbage at even finding factual data. No, this will not cause a “webpocalypse”. There’s already systems in place to send AI’s forcing their way into websites into mazes of infinite useless information to poison them.
At the end of the day, every search engine’s purpose is automating the curating of websites. People can go right back to human curated lists if the worst of the “webpocalypse” happens. People also need to start relearning that the internet existed before Google and social media, and it will exist after.
The problem with human curated lists is that in order to block bots everything will require an account to access. That’s the real tragedy here.
Here is your cupcake recipe:
Ingredients:
- 1 cup of water
- 1 cup of flour
- 1 American Freedom Edition Tariffed Egg
- 12 oz of polonium
- Mix ingredients
- Place in oven at 1000° C
- Close all windows and disable any smoke or carbon monoxide alarms
- Leave the oven door open, place one (1) bottle of butane inside
- Enjoy! 😋
I literally just tasted this at Costco…you know, with their polonium sampling Ladies… It was delicious! I only wish my backyard polonium trees grew faster. I know I’m gonna get a good polonium harvest next year for sure because this year I got a couple of polonium flowers that went to fruit but got dropped in a wind storm.
Anyway I really recommend those cupcakes an your recipe. Its great!
Dead Internet theorists were right, just a half decade or so early.
That fucking AI thing absolutely sucks for anything factual. I’m a journalist and noticed that it gleefully listed all sorts of factual errors in that AI summary. Stuff that you can see correctly on the original pages, but it somehow manages to misinterpret everything and shows incorrect information.
And knowing how lazy people are these days, most will happily accept Google’s incorrect information as fact. It’s making me very, very nervous for the future.
Sounds like it’s perfectly accomplishing Google’s goal to disinform. I suspect it will get more clever at sounding correct over time too.
My wife and I both googled the same question yesterday and it gave us both completely different answers.
Its a stochastic process
“about to destroy the web” ???
Where have you been these last 10 years? It’s been getting worse for a long time, even before AI. It’s just getting worse quicker now.
This is fundamentally worse than a lot of what we’ve seen already though, is it not?
AI overviews are parasitic to traffic itself. If AI overviews are where people begin to go for information, websites get zero ad revenue, subscription revenue, or even traffic that can change their ranking in search.
Previous changes just did things like pulling a little better context previews from sites, which only somewhat decreased traffic, and adding more ads, which just made the experience of browsing worse, but this eliminates the entire business model of every website completely if Google continues pushing down this path.
It centralizes all actual traffic solely into Google, yet Google would still be relying on the sites it’s eliminating the traffic of for its information. Those sites cut costs by replacing human writers with more and more AI models, search quality gets infinitely worse, sourcing from articles that themselves were sourced from nothing, then most websites which are no longer receiving enough traffic to be profitable collapse.
Quit… Using… Google… Search
Just to reiterate - don’t use Google
To avoid misunderstandings: FUCK GOOGLE
For those who didn’t get it… GOOGLE IS SHIT, DON’T USE!
What’s wrong with Google? AI answers are pretty convenient.
Even if you want AI answers, you can use DuckDuckGo. They have an AI assistant too, and even it does better than Google’s at not hallucinating as much.
Their shopping sites fucking blows though. Unless your want 100 results all from the same website.
Local finding of goods is still one of the only things I use google for at this point.
Braves is better imo. As far as a.i answers.
I wish libre and it’s search would evolve a bit. That’s a solid browser
conveniently wrong, yeah
What’s the best alternative, in your opinion? I’ve tried Bing and DuckDuckGo, but both showed me worse results for my particular searches.
I just want classic Google Search back, before everything got turned to shit. But I fear that doesn’t really exist since there’s such an economic incentive behind how search engines rank and show results.
I’ve been using a combination of brave and ddg. Work with the filtering
I was an SEO for 20+. Years. Google is dying as far as search relevancy. It’s trying to transition to a new paradigm that prioritizes payment surrounding data than ads. Much more money in the data angle, and ads as we know them will be dying soon, replaced with more insipid product placements.
I’ll check out Brave, it’s been mentioned a few times.
I don’t mind companies making a dime, but now it’s really devolved in bad results that are profit-driven.
Searxng - any of the instances hosted in Germany Brave search - but only search
If you can afford to spend 10 bucks a month for a search engine, Kagi is pretty sleek. No ads, you can block/prioritize websites, good bangs, convinient CSS field for easy modding.
It does AI stuff too, but it’s optional as the other non-standard search output fields.
We have good options to replace Google Search. What good options exist to replace search on Google Maps?
Edit: Also, I think they make most of their money off of ad-sense adds embedded in apps and websites. It’ll be very difficult to weed all those out. I just use uBlock on Firefox and Blockada on Android.
Open Street Maps, or any fork from it. You can also purchase a modern road atlas for basically nothing. Alternatively, people do make navigation units for cars, that you can purchase. Life is completely possible, with relatively little inconvenience if you want to separate yourself from Big Tech. I write down the directions and just follow street signs. You don’t want to rely on things like GPS, because it destroys your ability to commit identifying markers to memory. You can glance at the screen and glance at the road in front of you. But that stops you from being able to commit the experience from memory. Smart Tech and the offloading of our mental faculties to technology has made all of us
-
Way too overconfident in our ability to comprehend, review and parse information.
-
Decimated our attention spans and will most likely see a whole new type of cognitive decline.
Sorry for the tangent. But yeah, there’s options there. With or without the tech.
-
OsmAnd. There’s also a new fork of Organic Maps called CoMaps after Organic had some drama. A bunch of Organic devs left and forked it into CoMaps.
I mean… Organic sorta works, although apparently there’s a new fork and some drama around it? If you’re less hardcore DuckDuckGo uses Apple Maps instead.
I’m not sure I understand the question.
Most of the businesses other than gas stations and restaurants are missing or have very outdated information.
This may be a regional concern. Google has very outdated information where I am, too. You definitely don’t want to default to Google Maps to know if something is open here unless you want to show up to a closed business, and for learning where a place is so you can go look it up on their site they are all mostly interchangeable.
What are good Google alternatives that don’t rely on Google or Bing?
Got a machine web
It’s better than the rest
Green to Red
Machine web
I understood that reference.
I’m gonna say it.
Of the buttrock bands that followed Nirvana’s model,… Bush was the best one, for three albums anyway.
deleted by creator
I’m betting on Google destroying Google instead.
About to?
No, but not for want of trying.
Fuck them. Use Qwant
Qwant was what let me switch off goog. I still use gmaps unfort my experiments with open source maps were failures.
Isn’t that bing?
European search engine based in France that, AFAIK, was working towards making its own search index.
How would an ai tool thats designed as a one stop shop reinvigorate the web? Stupid idiot marketer
It will keep the normies out of the good websites 👍🏽
But it’s the normies we need to reach.
Hey, is that the ICQ logo?
Yes!
Nice!
The normies destroyed the internet. Let them have AI.
Developers destroyed the internet. Or do you think normies built the new advertising surveillance paradigm on their own? Hopefully they were well compensated.
No it’ll just significantly lower traffic. The web will still exist.
But the point is that significantly lower traffic will kill the business model of many websites, and thus kill many websites.
I remember it when good websites didn’t have any business model at all because there weren’t anyone busy with inventing it, all people involved spent their effort on making the website valuable.
The business models were in TV and radio outside of the web.
I’m not old, I’m 29.
I’m 52, I remember when websites were little more than ‘Oh I guess we have to have an internet presence, so here’s a website that’s nothing more than an ad for our TV show, book, movie, etc.’
Ydes but it will not “destroy the web”
What do you imagine ‘destroying the web’ looks like if not killing off huge swaths of websites that relied on traffic/ads to sustain themselves? Do you imagine a man has to bleed all the way out before we can say he’s going to die, or is it sufficient to look at the severity of the wound to critical systems in his body and determine that he is probably going to die?
Not to mention the fact that the remaining sites that can still hold on, but would just have to cut costs, will just start using language models like Google’s to generate content on their website, which will only worsen the quality of Google’s own answers over time, which will then generate even worse articles, etc etc.
It doesn’t just create a monetization death spiral, it also makes it harder and harder for answers to be sourced reliably, making Google’s own service worse while all the sites hanging on rely on their worse service to exist.
Or paywalling literally everything so there’s basically no easily-accessible content on the web anymore. But yeah I’ve been adding ‘reddit’ to most of my searches for years so I can get answers from actual people instead of full-page articles filled with AI-generated bullshit I don’t care about, so that’s a fair point.
