• Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember when I found out that shit was plastic. I always assumed they were organic material of some kind, like the body scrubs with the crushed up walnut shell in it (which probably has fucking microplastic in it, too). So disgusting.

    This is why we need to change how shit works. It shouldn’t go: company does some shit > fall out > government steps in. It should go: company has an idea > must get permission first from environmental agencies

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The difference is in the definition or organic. When the average person thinks organic, they mean something that is or used to be alive. When a scientist think organic, they’re talking about carbon compounds.

        • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Plastic are made from fossil fuels which are from primordial plants. So still organic according to your definition. Just a few hundred million years since it was alive.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting. Always thought chewing gum was more like when you made “plastic” out of the caesin in milk.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Plastic is an organic material, trees are mostly plastic (lignin, a phenolic polymer, cellulose a polysaccharide polymer, hemicellulose an heteropolysaccharide and suberin a polyester-like polymer).

      The problem we’re having is a naturalistic fallacy crossed with the unpleasant fact that almost everything we touch sheds dust and powder absolutely everywhere. This along with spores and yeast and other dusts constantly enter our bodies.

      Plastic is only of note because we made it.

      Any problems beyond that is speculative and will requires ginormous gobs of grant money to actually answer with anything than precautionary principle-based FUD.

      • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Hydrocarbon based plastic absolutely isnt natural, there are many different kinds of plastic in existence but overwhelmingly stuff from the last 50 years has been the inorganic hydrocarbon non biodegradable hydrocarbon type which doesn’t break down and is likely a endocrinologal distruptor & a carcinogen.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          inorganic hydrocarbon

          Hydrocarbons are, by definition, organic compounds made exclusively of carbon and hydrogen.

          Do you know of any hydrocarbon that do not contain hydrogen nor carbon and that are relevant to this discussion ?

          • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Care to not nitpick a slip of the mind (that’s already been pointed out and corrected) literally just after I had woken up and address the actual point?

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              current plastics not biodegradable is the same problem that trees had for 300 million years. I think it’s a matter of time before some yeast evolves the ability to eat plastic. Then all plastic will start to mold and rot like all other organic matter.

              as for being “endocrinologal distruptor & a carcinogen”, yes so is a lot of other stuff, probably stuff in wood, again, like turpentine

              We’re not going to ban all plastics until some company has a proprietary alternative that they can force us to buy by making all other products illegal to produce. But that new alternative doesn’t exist yet.

              My advice, don’t eat electrical junction boxes

              • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Ty for the response. I do agree we will likely wind up with some sort of plastic eating organism at some point, problem is how many centuries will that take. Might be a opportunity to apply gene editing at some point in the medium term future.

                Fair point on turps but turps and other compounds from wood dont tend to linger in the enviroment for as long as plastic does currently.

                Unfortunately any solutions will be taken by porkies and as you say regulatory captured into making our lives more expensive rather than for the betterment of humanity, should be govt ran labs looking into this sort of stuff not corpos with dollar signs in their eyes. Having saidthat some early stage alternatives such as a seaweed based biodegradable plastic could help hugely in the single use plastic department.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are probably some with sand and other hard minerals, I think Dove had some soaps with aluminum oxide in it?

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          i’ve definitely seen things like that, i think mostly “artisanal” soaps with like ground coconut shell or something, but the thing is that it tends to look like shit.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I would much rather use that bar of soap than the mysterious liquid gels full of dyes and other junk. If natural tones are somehow gross and icky but a blood red goo that faintly smells of petro chemicals is fine then maybe we really are doomed as a species.

            You go back a century or so, that bar of soap would likely have been considered a luxury product.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              i don’t think soap with grit added would have ever been considered a luxury product, low-quality soap still looks way prettier

              • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                The grit exfoliates and makes your skin softer by removing dead skin. Definitely luxurious before soaps were more common.

          • KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            For real though, Gojo soap seems to work the best for getting rid of grease and oil from machines. My guess is regular soaps don’t do a great job at carrying away the oil residue, but Gojo soap just sands down your top skin layer to remove it.