Opening my weather app this morning I was greeted by this warning:

Google has announced that, starting in 2026/2027, all apps on certified Android devices will require the developer to submit personal identity details directly to Google. Since the developers of this app do not agree to this requirement, this app will no longer work on certified Android devices after that time.

It’s the first time I hear about this, seems to be about:

Tech crunch article from august, “google will require developer verification for android apps outside the play store”

Cirrus app: Github

Was this a big thing I somehow missed? I hope more devs will follow suit.

  • Imad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    I got the same alert on Gmaps WV (google map wrapper found f drood) Google is giving us more reasons to switch to a custom ROM

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Was this a big thing I somehow missed?

    It’s one of the many small things that hide the big thing. In 2027 android will be fully locked down, unnecessarily.

    The big thing is whatever the lockdown is for.

  • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This news makes me actually sad. I have had high hopes in the last years in the FOSS world, having myself and three other persons move to use Linux as daily driver on Desktop/Laptop.

    My phone has FOSS apps only except for banking, health, transport tickets and 2/3 work rekated stuff. My messaging, files and pictures are handled by FOSS apps installed from third parties (F-Droid, Obtainium) on selfhosted servers… I was finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.

    This news sound to me like the tunnel ahaead is collapsing.

    • Akip@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Agreed. Google just didn’t consent to you getting an app without ads. My hope is maybe we can circumvent it for a while with PWA or browser website bookmarks. Maybe long enough for alternatives to arrive or consumer protection to kick in. I refuse to give up hope even though I might need to abandon android. For now I guess I will just not buy another phone since androids time seems limited. Really hard to find something to recommend to family and friends that just works. My goto grapheneOS also seems more and more cut down with more and more apps refusing to work outside play store downloads or refusing to work on 3rd party OS.

    • Imad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      Syatem76? The same company that made POP OS are making PCs and laptops They claim that they made the laptop with the longest battery life

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    How easy is it to convert an Android app to a Linux mobile app of you’re the developer? If it’s written in JVM languages it shouldn’t be that hard right?

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      End-users can use e.g. waydro.id to run Android apps on Linux.

      I’m not deep into Android development, but I doubt it’s possible to just port an app without basically a complete rewrite. Android has an own layer on top of the JVM, called Zygote, and there’s presumably lots of system libraries which the Android apps implicitly depend on, for handling graphics and whatnot, which make tons of assumptions about running on an Android device.

    • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Just use a custom ROM. This sadly will affect app developers. But if you are on a custom ROM without GMS it will continue to work just fine.

      • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Google is trying to kill custom ROMs too. Also I thought the majority of modern phones aren’t bootloader unlockable.

        • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Ehhhh… sorta maybe. Ultimately they can’t, but they can make development more difficult.

          Also Google has nothing to do with whether or not you’re bootloader is unlockable. Get a phone that is.

          If you rally want to go down the whole FOSS path it does ultimately become a bit of a lifestyle.

        • MML@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You can unlock the bootloader on just about every phone, just depends on how much effort you want to spend.

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Wording of the message implies it’s possible to have uncertified version of Android… Such a thing possible?

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    They’re not “pulling” the app from anywhere, it’s just simply not going to work on “certified devices”. This is the end of Android as we know. It’s been a good run.

        • Akip@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Done! for the curious, original title, “Cirrus App dev pulling app from certified android devices in '26/'27” new, “Cirrus app dev informing the app will stop working on certified android devices in '26/'27”

    • Rustan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Only works for those of us who own a pixel or bought one for the reason but this won’t effect Graphene users

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s going to affect 100% of Android users because no one is going to develop apps just for the 10 people using uncertified devices.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Except it will, because developers aren’t going to bother maintaining an app where the install base is just pixel users with Graphene

        • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yep. We’ll be fine for a while but Google’s seriously axing the platform for foss projects and security-minded users. In no more than half a decade I anticipate Android’s open-source development scene will begin looking very similar to Apple’s.

      • vodka@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Nope, from how Google puts it, play services will block any and all apps without a valid signature from working at all on play certified devices.

        You’ll be able to install them via adb probably, but when you run them play services will stop you.

        Play services already prevents certain apps from starting until you say a yes/no on a popup, so the framework for this is already in place.

        • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          This is completely wrong. I asked this exact question to google in their poll and I got an answer from them saying it would always work with adb. It’s for devs so you can run those apps of course. This means F-Droid can implement a Shizuku backend to install apps and the UX will be even better since it will bypass popups. However, initial setup will be far more complicated

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You can but that’s REALLY not a solution. How many times/day to plan on plugging in your phone and running a couple dozen commands to update your apps?

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, you must have missed it. And so it begins.

    Google is moving to make Android less open source. I’m not sure more devs following suit is going be good for them or their users. The G doesn’t give an F.

    What we need is an OS fork that gets maintained. If not that, some other workaround that fools the Google servers. Because you can bet money that nobody made from flesh and blood is going to look at this inside Google.

    Maybe devs can band together and form Middle Finger Corp. and designate one willing person as their contact to serve as registered dev for a gazillion apps. Follow the letter of the law, not the misguided spirit of it, in a manner of speaking.

    If you are sitting on a mobile OS and you were afraid to fail like Windows, maybe now is the time to give it a go?

    • Dumhuvud@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Install, maybe. What about updates though? Do you plan to pull out adb for each and every one of them? Or would you rather keep using old, potentially insecure, versions?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      From what I’ve seen elsewhere, yes. adb sideloading will still be possible, but that adds a level of inconvenience many people will not enjoy, especially since FDroid and similar have been so easy.

  • Babalugats@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    And so it continues… Google trying to shoehorn themselves into a position of authority of the internet. Imagine they get as much sway as the banks now have? Private entities controlling the masses for massive profits. Fuck off Google.

  • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Would people be able to circumvent this by downgrading their version of Google Play Services? …or not updating it in the first place?

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’re baking this right in the package installer of android, it goes beyond play services. I have my doubts that this will pass in the EU

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        But that begs the same question. If you never update your existing phone with google’s malware, you should be ok.

        Obviously if you buy a new phone that’s already infected you’re screwed unless you can flash a new ROM on there.

        My point is. People’s current phones do not have this malware on it yet. If you disable updates and/or degoogle, your device should continue to work as is. Perhaps without being able to use Google Play Store, but honestly that’s not huge loss for anyone that cares about this stuff in the first place.

        • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          True, but using a phone and never updating it likely leaves you open to other malware/attacks sadly.

          • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That’s a bet I would rather take given the alternative.

            I don’t want any big tech shit on any of my devices. Microsoft, Google, Meta, X, etc can all eat a dick. I have zero trust in any of em.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think you could still adb install unverified apps into your phone.

      That untill they’ll block that path too.

      Also I suppose that you’ll need to adb every update. So apps that would want to go this way should self check updates instead of relying on an external store.

    • Akip@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank you for these links they are fantastic! I was aware of the procedural lock in via play integrity services and also the lockdown on side loading so that didn’t get past me, but I wasn’t aware google also wants to alienate developers now by requiring ID. It seems to me google want to now fully commercialize the platform, transforming it into the ad infested network that web2+3.0 already became. I think their plan, by alienating non commercial devs, is that all apps will run on their ad models and non without them will be left.

    • Akip@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      First of all thank you for providing a foss app!

      I think it’s a big difference if the platform tolerates you or actively wants to stop you from doing it. You got my fullest sympathy.

      • mat@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Thank you so much for the kind words! It’s indeed a bad time to be an app delevoper. At least the framework I use is portable-ish, so the work won’t be fully lost.