• Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    take one tablet by mouth

    You know for a fact that instruction is there because someone tried the other options

        • Echo (they/them)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          To go further, even the instruction “by the mouth” is ambiguous and could mean orally, buccally, or sublingually. Those all have different absorptions with the latter two being mucous membranes and therefore bypassing the liver, leading to different (generally better) bioavailability of medications dependent on the health of those tissues and the type of medication.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            No idea why you got downvoted. They arent rare, Zofran the most common anti nausea med is meant for sublingual.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If the doctor orders I eat 2 breakfasts, I’m not letting a pharmacy screw up the good thing I’ve got going!

    But what insurance is requiring 90 days and are they taking signups? Mine forces everything to 30 unless I use their mail pharmacy that constantly loses orders.

    • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      if that’s not on the sign at the hobbitton b&b i’m getting a refund (on my breakfast here, they will understand my outrage and support me i am sure)

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s an old picture anyways, who knows where it comes from at this point. If the original person hasn’t somehow got in trouble already, deleting this one won’t do much, so just smile and wave boys, smile and wave

    • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see this sort of thing all the time and it genuinely baffles me how people won’t cover up the entirety of the text they’re trying to censor. I’ve even seen people go over text with multiple passes of a transparent brush (which you can almost see through by squinting, let alone if you pulled it into a photo editor). Like, why?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whatever that top number may be, it’s very readable I just don’t wanna right now.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which is precisely my point - if I were so motivated, I could suss that out. Or do a partial/fragmentary OCR match on valid addresses in Ohio that align with possible zip code matches and narrow it down to a relatively small potential target set of addresses and individuals.

        • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          To target some random dude that received a silly prescription? Why go through all the effort when you could just pick a random residential address?

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s not about motivation. It’s about “is it feasibly possible to actually identify a person from this partially-obscured PHI”. But also, who the fuck knows if they’re going to care about enforcing PHI and HIPAA laws now 🫠

    • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the prescriber’s information. It says DEA, NPI, then the address, and probably phone number. None of that is HIPAA protected.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Idk I’m not a pharmacist, but I do work in biotech and have access to systems with PHI. All I’m saying is I treat this whole area with an abundance of caution.

        • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          And rightfully so! I would personally be too paranoid to even take a picture of a screen that had PHI, even if it was out of frame. However based on what is in the photo, nothing needed to be redacted from a HIPAA standpoint.