The TL;DR is that the organization that controls the HDMI standard won’t allow any open source implementation of HDMI 2.1.

So the hardware is fully capable of it, but they’ll get in trouble if them officially implement it.

Instead it’s officially HDMI 2 (which maxes out at 4k @ 60Hz), but through a technique called chroma sub-sampling they’ve been able to raise that up to 4k @ 120Hz.

However there are some minor reductions in picture quality because of this, and the whole thing would be much easier if the HDMI forum would be more consumer friendly.

In the meantime, the Steam Machine also has display port as a completely issue free display option.

  • skymtf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    At this point just make an “adapter” that captures the disaply port signal and outputs it from a “supported” device

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m honestly surprised TV OEMs haven’t bothered to at least try throwing in DisplayPort, especially during the period of time it far exceeded the highest possible quality on HDMI.

    HDMI is just the last hardware standard created from the ashes of the format wars that has no practical place anymore. It only exists to collect hostage licensing fees.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 hours ago

    governments should start cracking down on codecs. tf are dipshits allowed to hold standards hostage?

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      They really just need to demand that open formats are implemented in parallel with any proprietary ones, with no artificial feature/performance disparity allowed.

      That kills any incentive to keep the proprietary ones locked down because eventually the open formats will be available throughout the ecosystem and users will have devices with support in the entire pipeline. Then users will simply no longer want to deal with the locked down formats for long and nobody will want to sell them.

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Proprietary formats should be illegal. Consumers are idiots, marketing will convince them to support proprietary, and regulatory capture will compromise any attempt to stop disparity

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean the many incarnations of usbc are slowly making headway. For better and worse.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      USB-C probably cannot replace either, because the unmating force is too light. A typical HDMI or DisplayPort cable is much thicker, longer and hence heavier than a typical USB-C cable (even those specced to carry high bandwidth, like a thunderbolt cable) because they need better shielding to carry high bandwidth signals long distances - it’s not unusual to need to route HDMI several metres (but USB-C cables that long are unusual because of the different purposes)

      For TVs and such it’s useful to have the inputs connect vertically, so that they don’t stick out the back of the device and cause problems pushing it against a wall. Then the weight of the end of the cable is going to be trying to pull the connector out of the TV. DisplayPort connectors can have a latch to deal with this.

      Of course, there a ways around this: a new connector, for example. But it does mean that you can’t just leverage the existing pool of USB-C connectors and cables to make this ubiquitous.

      • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A good USB c cable and port can hold quite a bit of weight, I’ve easily picked my phone up by it as long as you don’t make any jerking movements. That’s a lot more weight than a few feet of even a very heavily shielded cable.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Solvable by moving the locking mechanism out of the port and making one that you can retrofit to any cable

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 hours ago

        To mention, this is also a problem with HDMI (but not DP).

        But just have the usb-c insert top down instead of bottom up, include room for a small loop and cable retention to ensure slack doesnt put pressure on the port. This easily allows for fixed connections with usb-c.

        There are also side-screw locking connectors for usb-c. With HDMI, a top-screw option was made for more fixed install scenarios. That design is ugly af and uses a massive amount more room than the usb-c screw lock approach.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Then the weight of the end of the cable is going to be trying to pull the connector out of the TV.

        Just duck tape the usb cable to the back of the TV

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The connectors on the back of the TV can be oriented horizontally (like parallel to the screen, not perpendicular), which at least changes the pull force to a torque force, which isn’t ideal but easier to hold on to.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ballparking but it will likely take closer to a decade than not for that to actually happen… and I am still not optimistic. And there are actually plenty of reasons to NOT want any kind of bi-directional data transfer between your device and the TV that gets updated to push more and more ads to you every single week.

      The reason HDMI is so successful is that the plug itself has not (meaningfully?) changed in closer to 20 years than not. You want to dig out that PS3 and play some Armored Core 4 on the brand new 8k TV you just bought? You can. With no need for extra converters (and that TV will gladly upscale and motion smooth everything…).

      Which has added benefits because “enthusiasts” tend to have an AV receiver in between.

      The only way USB C becomes a primary for televisions (since display port and usb c are arguably already the joint primary for computer monitors) is if EVERY other device migrates. Otherwise? Your new TV doesn’t work with the PS5 that Jimmy is still using to watch NFL every week.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        USB-C adapters for absolutely everything are thankfully quite common now thanks to the laptop/dock industry.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          In the sense that we have dongles/docks, sure. In the sense of monitors with native USB-c input? These are still fairly rare as the accepted pattern is that your dock has an HDMI/DP port and you connect via that (which actually is a very good pattern for laptops).

          As for TVs? I am not seeing ANYTHING with usb c in for display. In large part because the vast majority of devices are going to rely on HDMI. As I said above.


          I’ll also add that many (most?) of those docks don’t solve this problem. The good ones are configured such that they can pass the handshake information through. I… genuinely don’t know if you can do HDCP over USBC->HDMI as I have never had reason to test it. Regardless, it would require both devices at the end of that chain to be able to resolve the handshakes to enable the right HDMI protocol which gets us back to the exact same problem we started with.

          And the less good docks can’t even pass those along. Hence why there is a semi-ongoing search for a good Switch dock among users and so forth.

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Regarding the Nintendo Switch, it’s because of their engineered malicious USB-C protocol design that makes the console “Not behave like a good USB citizen should”. It’s less of an issue with the peripherals as a whole.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The adapters have circuity inside, they exist. It’s small enough to still just look like a cable because they fit the chip in a plug end.

      • SteveTech@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        DP has an option to transmit HDMI signals instead, this is what passive adapters use and will still have the same HDMI 2.0 issue. A DP source can be passively adapted to HDMI, but a HDMI source cannot be passively adapted to DP.

        You can also get active HDMI adapters which actively convert the signal, and can work with HDMI 2.1. Intel actually has an active converter chip built into their ARC GPUs, and is how they get around this issue.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What a bummer. I guess TIL that i, in fact, don’t use one literally every single day.

        • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Is it 2.1? Does it transmit cec commands? No? Strange…

          It’s almost like we are commenting under a post that is saying exactly that.

  • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I really wish I could find a TV within my desired specs that had DisplayPort. We will buy a Steam Machine to use it in place of our docked Steam Deck in the living room, so being able to use DP would be amazing.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Adapting DisplayPort to HDMI with minimal quality loss is child’s play. It’s the other way around that’s misery.

      Any cheap adapter cable that supports DisplayPort In to HDMI Out should be perfectly fine.

      • T (they/she)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I just realized I have such cable in my desk (brand new), DP to HDMI 4k 60fps

        My spouse need something for the other way around for his desk setup

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Those specs sound like HDMI 2 anyway. HDMI 2.1 can do 4K @ 144Hz with HDR. Or apparently even 10K @ 120Hz.

      • YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        But the big thing with HDMI 2.1 is the cec protocol which doesn’t translate over an adapter unfortunately. But it is a very tiny thing most people won’t care about.

      • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Would be cool if they put one in the box. Would save many sad christmas days as you wait for Amazon to come round with an adapter.

    • ngdev@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i want to say you can buy an adapter to get dp 1.4 out of steam machine and into hdmi 2.1 on a tv and should be fine. just has to be a powered adapter i believe

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The powered adapters are for the other way around. DP has support for HDMI out without additional components, but ofc the HDMI forum makes converting HDMI to DP like pulling teeth.

      • Midnitte@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yep it’s pretty much better in all regards.

        The only downside is no ARC support, but I suppose support for that is pretty hit or miss anyway.

        • Bongles@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Honestly arc is a great idea that never seems to work for me. I’ll always be RIGHT there, but my Blu-ray player turns on randomly when I’m doing something else, or something like that. So I end up turning it off.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I would normally prefer no hdmi at all, but it’s an entry point device so it doesn’t really make sense to do that.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Not that easy.

      To get HDMI 2.1 support for the Gabe Cube itself essentially requires kernel level patches. Which on a “normal” Linux device is possible (but ill advised) but on these atomic distros where even something like syncthing involves shenanigans to keep active week to week? Ain’t happening. Because HDMI is not just mapping data to pins and using the right codecs. There are a LOT of handshakes involved along the way (which is also the basis for HDCP which essentially all commercial streaming services utilize to some degree).

      There ARE methods (that I have personally used) to take a DP->HDMI dongle and flash a super sketchy Chinese (the best source for sketchy tech) firmware to effectively cheat the handshakes. It isn’t true HDMI 2.1 but it provides VRR and “good enough for 2025” HDR at 4k/120Hz. But… I would wager money that is violating at least one law or another.

      So expect a lot of those “This ini change fixes all of Windows 11. Just give money to my patreon for it” level fixes. And… idiots will believe it since you can use a dongle to already get like HDMI 2.05 or whatever with no extra effort. And there will likely be a LOT of super sketchy dongles on AliExpress that come pre-flashed that get people up to 2.09 (which is genuinely good enough for most people). But it is gonna be a cluster.

      And that is why all of us with AMD NUCs already knew what a clusterfuck this was going to be.


      There are also ways to fake the handshake in software. I personally did not try that but from what I have seen on message boards? It is VERY temporary (potentially having to redo every single time you change inputs on your TV/receiver) and it is unclear if the folk who think it works actually tested anything or just said “My script printed out ‘Handshake Successful’, it works with this game that doesn’t even output HDR!”

      • SteveTech@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        on these atomic distros where even something like syncthing involves shenanigans to keep active week to week? Ain’t happening.

        I don’t see why you couldn’t kexec into a new kernel. kexec will load a kernel into memory from an already running kernel, and jump into it. It’ll suck for the user as they’ll have to semi-reboot everytime they want HDMI 2.1, but it’s easy and doesn’t install anything.

        There’s also live patching, but I think that’ll be a bit of work.

        Of course the kernel needs to be compiled with those options enabled, but most distros do.

      • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Cable Matters sells plenty of different DP->HDMI 2.1 adapters that work with VRR. The main issue here is that you won’t get CEC if you use those.

        • ErableEreinte@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I have one of these, but I don’t believe they work with HDMI 2.1 VRR (or at least I’ve never been able to get it to work).
          With a LG B9, I have both G-Sync and HDMI 2.1 VRR support, but no FreeSync. I can get most of the HDMI 2.1 feature set working with a DP->HDMI 2.1 adapter, except for any form of VRR. That’s with a RX 9070, but similar situation on a 6800 XT previously.

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Ukrainians had a reputation for being the best source for cracks for the DRM on farming and construction equipment that prevented third-party repairs and modifications.

          (There’s a reason farmers are one of the biggest groups pushing for Right to Repair.)

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      If would need to be patched in on Linux kernel level, which is annoying to say the least.