(Not sure if this is worldwide or only in some countries)

Updating to iOS 26.4DB2 will put your phone into a parental-restricted mode with adult websites blocked on all browsers, warning prompts every time you try to send or receive an explicit image on a messaging app, and all social media apps blocked on the App Store (in Australia)

The settings to disable this mode are locked off until you verify your age either with a credit card, photo ID, or though information Apple already has (like the age of your account).

I’ve been an apple user my entire adult life but this might finally be the thing that forces me off the platform. Do any other long term apple users have some tips about migrating? I’ve heard Ashai Linux is pretty good on mac hardware these days and I’ve been thinking about GrapheneOS for a while.

    • freedickpics@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You think this isn’t coming to other devices? Google will presumably add this to Android and apps will follow suit by looking to the OS to verify your age so other forks will probably have to add it. Linux on smartphones is dead in the water so what’s the alternative?

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just hope this doesnt impact macos until the end of the year, then I will be able to move to linux on my laptop.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    So now California has a governor pretending to be pro-Palestine to do damage control while signing laws that give Zionist corporations more control over your data and hardware

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Must be outside of California, Colorado, and Brazil to download this Linux ISO”

    “Must be outside of California, Colorado, and Brazil to proceed with installation”

  • sen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Wait, send explicit images? I’m not a child, I get that on these platforms my privacy is pretty well gone, but is it explicitly known (confirmed from the source) that these companies scan your images too?

    That feels extra fucked up. Like "hold on a sec bucko let me check this photo you’re trying to send real quick to make sure it’s not titties "

  • doodoo_wizard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s under settings > Apple account (the bubble with your name if you’re signed in) > age range for apps.

    The first time you click it you’re asked to go ahead or update your birthday in the account first.

    Inside you can pick to always, never or ask first before sharing your age range with some app and it says you can see what apps have asked for your age range.

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lmao good fucking luck enforcing this on Linux. There’s no central authority to handle age verification, and even if there was, it’d take less than a week for someone to make a patched version of whatever tool they use that just… Autoreports that you’re an adult no matter what.

      • quips@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I suggest simply never complying. Anyone who does is a traitor. This is FOSS, they have no control over us.

        • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I suggest simply never complying.

          While this is the best. it is not feasible. Not many open source projects can just pay millions on fines and not think about it. Idiots making these laws cant enforce it but they will try in the only way they know. Fine and fine and fine untill a project dies.

          • maturelemontree@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Forgive my confusion but could they not choose to lock out web traffic without a verification? Lets say your ISP joins and says that you need x bullshit token from the government to us it, then what?

          • quips@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            How would they have to pay any fines if they simply say we are no longer for use in xyz place doing age verification?

            Second, how would payment be enforced when there is no organization to fine?

  • 64bithero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    224
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I find it odd to protect children they will stalk the hell out of us but won’t arrest known pedophiles …

    I hate the world

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Also they’ll deny trans kids puberty blockers which are proven to be safe and reversible, and the alternative creates harm.

      And they’ll censor the internet for ‘children’ (a 17 year old is not a child) to prevent them finding community, support or education outside their IRL religious and harmful bubbles.

      It was never about actually protecting children

    • lukaro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah apparently it’s fine for them to fuck kids but too immoral to risk kids seeing people fucking.

      • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. Governments around the world, including the U.S., of course, have made it crystal clear through their actions that they don’t give a fuck about protecting children.

    • Sims@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      Better to just hate the whole Epstein Class. They trash the world for everyone else…

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        We’ve had a name for them for the last 200 years: the capitalist class, or to be more precise, the haute bourgeoisie. The 1% of the 1%.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If everyone voting for these age requirements don’t also vote to require you to use an ID to unlock the safety on a gun or remove a knife from the knife rack, they aren’t voting on this to protect the children.

      Knives and guns need age verification before someone seeing Kate Upton showing her breasts.

      Im going side with none of it needs age verification, and all of it needs parental guidance

  • 7112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is insane. They have to view your images to deem of they are explicit…

    Basically a year away from a universal internet ID that will track all movements and can be restricted if your government doesn’t like you.

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        For a phone sim…of course you do. I mean they would know who pays the bill anyway right? Unless you have a phone company that takes bitcoin or cash only.

        • freedickpics@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Phone companies are required to collect and retain IDing info of customers to activate a phone number in Australia. There’s no way around it unfortunately

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They already are. Well depends on who they are I guess but someone is.

        • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This would be pre vpn or anything else you could do to protect your privacy - if it’s at the OS level it’s before the browser and VPN level

          That’s not happening now, but it’s the only way the are gonna be able to to check content to make sure “ the children are safe “

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That was already happening, as the option to block sending and receiving of such content was able to be turned on in your screen time settings, and you could mandate it for your children by managing your kids accounts on the family organizers device. If someone is under the age of 13 they are required to be on a family share, and if you don’t have “Ask to Buy” enabled, from what I know you won’t get a refund for anything with the excuse my kid bought this without permission.

      Overall it all seems logical, but in those scenarios the ages and requirements are mostly all controlled by the parent.

      • 7112@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Scary. I had no idea it went beyond the iCloud scans. I avoided the cloud after that celebrity image leak.

        Guess we might see a rise in offline or dumb devices. I wonder how this will affect other nations that already have restrictive internet access. If the US West becomes more locked down where would free and accessible info go?

    • freedickpics@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean some shit you find online is pretty grim but when I was a kid I knew the internet was for adults and didn’t expect everything to be catered to me. Now the status quo seems to be “every website must be kid/advertiser friendly and PG13 by default, everything else must be locked behind a verification prompt”. How did we get here?

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        23 hours ago

        We let 5 companies control the internet. Instead of being the distributed thing it was dreamed up to be we allowed it to consolidate.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          And it’s not like servers have gotten harder to run! Pirates serve terabytes of data that’s straight-up illegal! Your fuckin’ commercial connection should be plenty for any damn thing you want.

  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    After commercial OS have age verification they will remove it from the programs because the age was already verified, right? (Padme asking Anakin)

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re going to burn this in all the way from the sub-microprocessor DRM/TPM to the browser, aren’t they?

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You can build browsers from source. And import open hardware from China. RISCV is getting close to usable, these days.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        You can buy them now, because the US hasn’t banned their import yet, but that’s what these laws will lead to.

        • eleitl@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 hours ago

          When general computing is outlawed, only outlaws will have general computers.

          I’ll meet you in the digital underground, netizen.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Google tried a few years back but there was pushback. Google will slowly boil the frog tho.