Putting Kali Linux, a Distro specifically for cybersecurity and hackers, anywhere near the “corporate” axis, could be considered a war crime in some places.
Where redstarOS?
Top left off grid.
Exactly, so where is it?
I think that GrapheneOS is an amazing underappreciated project and deserves more attention.
I think it’s overappreciated. There are alternatives that better fit the needs of most users, support more phone models and are developed by people more responsive to their users needs that Graphene.
This is absolutely terrible.
Where is TempleOS?
Down left
Lmao didn’t even see it. Fitting location
Bottom left off grid.
Debian is out of date :D
I’m running 6.19.8 kernel which is just two minor releases behind the latest kernel version.
Current Arch Linux, which is supposedly “Extremely up to date”, ships with 6.18.13 kernel.
WTF?
macOS*
I use NixOS btw.
Nah…
“Some people don’t like Snaps” 😂
In the super niche and very corporate corner, you should put Windows Server, because nobody uses Windows fucking Server.
FreeBSD on the “Indy” side? I uh… Have to disagree. There’s routers that ship with FreeBSD SPECIFICALLY because their license has no obligation to share sourcecode.
And putting RHEL anything but top line makes the whole thing unserious. A PRODUCT YOU BUY to even be able to download it is somehow not 100% corpo to you? Its named after the IBM-owned company that releases it. It is not 100% open source, it is Linux with proprietary “secret sauce” that’s mostly for Servers - a niche usecase.
Alma is “built for enterprise” but somehow Indy? Now I know you’re just messing with us. This cannot be serious.
Excellent Troll.
Saying Redhat is based on Fedora just seems wrong. I know there was discussion about this when the simpler version was posted and I think I understand that, today, RHEL is downstream of Fedora. But Redhat existed before Fedora so it still feels wrong to say Fedora is based on Redhat.
“Fedora Core 1 was the first version of Fedora and was released on November 6, 2003.[15] It was codenamed Yarrow. Fedora Core 1 was based on Red Hat Linux 9.”
And putting RHEL anywhere but top line is sacrilege. Its actually, literally, specifically an IBM-purchased company’s product. The Linux part is free, but there’s corporate “special sauce” thrown in that’s closed source.
Improving over the prior version.
Still may help to make the axis labels more pronounced and/or stop using the political compass colours.
nixos is on the wrong side. literally funded by the United States’ war machine.
I use Fedora but it should probably be on the corpo side of the line because it is part of the RHEL family.
It is technically fully community driven though. And if you moved it up you’d need more squares. No way in hell is it on the same level of corporate as Ubuntu, or especially Android.
