• Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    You ban something, and people will always find a way around it. Always.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Yup, and that’s how the US got the Mafia. We banned alcohol, but people wanted to drink, so the Mafia made that happen.

      All a ban does is hurt law abiding citizens and businesses.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    Clearly it’s a parental problem to determine if the VPN they are buying for their kids is being used to wank off, but apparently this party of ‘liberty’ has an unhealthy obsession with monitoring our children’s genitalia these days.

  • Photuris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We didn’t see this one coming a mile away.

    Palantir execs and shareholders are buzzing with anticipation.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s a bit like “my kids will only eat chocolate” and the therapist’s response “where are they getting the chocolate from?”. If the kids are using VPNs then where are they getting the money for the VPN from? Is this parental consent?

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Stop ministers making laws to… why the fuck they even do this bullshit? They are a government, they know everything about everyone even without such primitive control methods.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The people pulling the strings have obviously decided that internet freedom is a threat to them and they’re taking (global) action to ensure their supremacy.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Seriously though. We’ll legislate anything to keep them from seeing stuff they might reasonably expect to see and do one day and glorify things nobody should ever see or experience in person.

  • FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: “Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it’s absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that’s one of my major recommendations.”

    If this fucker had any idea what VPN even stood for they’d realize how fuckin stupid this statement is…

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yeah, it’s just all these children with their bank accounts paying for their VPN subscriptions doing it all… Do they think we’re that stupid? Don’t answer that. 😔

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Let’s say they do. So people start using non UK VPNs. So you need age verification for any Internet access? For any computer or phone that could connect to the Internet?

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      and here we have the heart of the issue, and their end goal. identification required for Internet access. total control.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        100% and as always they boil it down to “well even if all that other stuff is true, it’s for the safety of children.”

        Yet we have fucking confirmation that exposing networks of wealthy and powerful pedophiles is not on the agenda. Those people are untouchable. Those people are also the ones that we are handing complete control over to.

        So who tf are we really protecting children from by doing this?

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That’s what they’re aiming for, yes.

      They want to know where everyone is and what every person is doing at every possible moment of every day, be that in public or on the Internet. They are paranoid and know that their entire system is in danger of collapse with the common man gaining control over the rich and powerful.

      Thus they resort to extreme control of the commoners to ensure that won’t happen.

      Child protection and anti-pornography stances are perfect excuses because they’re very difficult to argue against.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        36 minutes ago

        Every time some new measure is released “for protection”, the next day it’s being used to sniff out dissidents. That usually means journalists, activists (political, labor, environment, …) and sympathisants to give them a bit of pressure to straight up arrest them on some pretense.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Don’t parental controls exist for a reason? Can’t you just block VPN use on individual devices like an additional parental control rather than making everyone that uses a VPN prove they’re not a child?

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Everyone’s scared of Reform getting in and yet Reform are the only ones promising to reverse all this. All this is done based off the back of a 2016 survey where parents said they were worried about kids watching porn on the internet, but the survey gave no indication of what a solution would look like and gave no mention to online age verification and banning VPNs.