• notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is the sort of silly law I can actually get behind, so long as they didn’t spend long on it. It adds a bit of local flavor, and has a positive motive.

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    Illinoian here to provide additional context.

    In 2009, the Illinois State Senate passed a resolution to return Pluto to its planetary status, partly in honor of its discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, who was from Streator, Illinois. The resolution was a response to the IAU’s 2006 vote that reclassified Pluto as a dwarf planet.

    Ill. Senate declares Pluto a planet | https://abc7chicago.com/archive/6695131/

  • Visstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    I like the “legally” part implying that you will get a ticket for insisting it is a planet.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Why the fuck we didn’t just deem Eris into planethood I’ll never understand. Both it and Pluto are arguably more similar to Terra than the gas giants are.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I think because if we called both Eris and Pluto planets, then we’d have a bunch of other current dwarf planets that would also qualify, like Ceres, Makemake, etc.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I for one welcome all these Plutoid planets to the planet family.

            What’s the downside, we have to make a new mnemonic? Or add a verse to the Blue’s Clues Planet Song? I think we’re capable.

            • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              On the upside pluto being classified as a dwarf planet is what of what got ceres promoted out of asteroid and into dwarf planet, and now its turning out to be super interesting with potential subsurface ice and possibly being the core remnant of a failed planet that was torn apart by jupiter before it could fully form.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The mindset of “wah, science is wrong and bad because it changed its mind about something I learned about as a child” is not harmless, it’s how we end up with anti-vaxxers in charge of the CDC

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’ve directly heard the argument from creationists of “they were wrong about Pluto being a planet, why would they be right about evolution?” Yeah, misunderstanding how all this works does matter.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not so much this case in particular, but the idea of it and what it represents. Pluto being a dwarf planet or not is really just an astronomical categorisation, and that’s where the usefulness starts and ends. You won’t go to jail for calling it a planet, even though it doesn’t meet the standards.

        The idea of using legislation on such an irrelevant thing is what rankles me. It’s frivolous and could be harmful. Perhaps not in this particular case, but legislating away expert opinion because it doesn’t fit with your personal narrative is a problem.

        Right now it’s a planet, but this shit happens with peoples lives as well.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pluto is, and always will be, a planet. That Tyson guy just got a bunch of his friends to agree with him about Pluto not being a planet so he could further his career with shock and awe, and lots of talk show spots. Talk show spots are where the real money is, not science. He’s a genius (but wrong about Pluto).

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      just got a bunch of his friends to agree with him

      You mean the International Astronomical Union? I mean at some point if every world-level expert on the topic is saying the same thing, then maybe you need to let go of what Miss Honey told you in first grade.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s not a genuis, he’s smart but very arrogant, he’s intolerable when you get him next to an actual subject matter expert

      But he is right about Pluto. We either would need to add a half dozen+ more planets, or demote one into a new category. And Pluto would currently be in the bottom of that category - it’s barely large enough to fit in the new category, so it’s not a matter of where to draw the line

      And in his words, if Pluto was between us and the sun it would grow a tail, and that’s no type of behavior for a planet to have