• Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Literally Spez right now…

    (I’d post the uncensored image but IIRC Lemmy World is German-based and have strict laws against Nazi iconography)

    He’s wilfully given the data of users who have criticized Trump and ICE, AND he looks like a spitting image of Tintin…

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Theil should be removed from any authoritative seats he may hold, and then be stripped of his wealth to stop him buying our elected officials

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Peter fucking thiel has too much money and is backing everything, for example PayPal and stripe that are processing 80% of e-commerce payments

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Fucking never. Never ever. I’d sooner cut myself off from all technology and live in the woods than willingly give those creepy fucks my middle goddamn name. There is absolutely nothing good that will come from this company. The people at that company literally fucking movie villains. It’s fucking crazy that absolutely anyone works with them, let alone world governments.

    These large scale surveillance companies like Palantir, like Flock, they shouldn’t exist. They should be outlawed. Our government needs probable cause and a warrant to surveil a suspect. If a normal civilian followed you around and filmed you, kept track of you at all times, they’d be arrested for stalking. But for some reason private companies can just watch every man, woman, and child in public and online, catalog all our movements, where we went, how we went there, who was with us, track what we do, what we read, who we know, how we spend our time, what we say, etc., and then permanently log all of that, use it to form dociers on us, predict our behaviors, or desires, ways to manipulate us, and then turn around and sell that data to governments, other companies and private parties. How the fuck is that legal.

    Why in the fuck would you ever allow a private, profit-driven company to have that kind of power over your nation, let alone reward it with federal dollars, long term contracts and access to our law enforcement and military data and systems?

    Worse, the founders and CEO are unhinged wannabe dictators trying to form their own sovereign techno-states. They’re not even secretive about that. And our goverment is fucking funding these nuts and giving them every detail of the lives of our citizenry, our goverment officials, our military… how fucking stupid do we have to be, guys? I wish I could say it’s just Trump but it’s not. It’s mind boggling.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Is it?

      Most people won’t care and continue using it anyways.

      I won’t, for sure, but most people are fucking idiots when it comes to this stuff

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The problem is there are a lot of subreddits that are an excellent resource. As far as I know, there aren’t any Blender help instances with a 100,000 people. I really wish there were.

        • YeahToast@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, I haven’t used reddit for years, but recently landed there trying to figure out an issue with raspberry pi /ssh. So much content and support… real shame

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Fucking Peter literally creating the very monster he claims to hate.

    16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They’re trying to force it to happen. They somehow think they’ll be spared any only the people they hate will have to suffer.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      i still use them without going through the id system

      hasn’t affected me at all

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The problem is that millions do, and won’t understand what the big deal is, and be sucked into the fucking psyop vortex.

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Few powerful people deciding everything and millions falling in line and the few outliers being affected even if they opt out due to decisions of millions of others who support the few powerful sums up the world.

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              That’s the thing. You don’t have to fool all the people all of the time, just most of the people most of the time.

              • pdxfed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I’m watching Gladiator tonight for the first time in 20 years. It’s hardly new but so painful to watch again through the lens of the current state of America. It went from ominous historical warning 25 years ago of power, weakness and how men act in opportune moments to a primer on current affairs.

                • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I never really saw it as an allegory for fascism, but that’s an interesting take.

                  At least the bad guy gets shanked in the end.

          • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Indeed. It’s like so many people have been trained to be asleep at the wheel.

            • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Many don’t have the capacity left to make conscious decisions about these things - either they are already living paycheck to paycheck or it is too abstract for them to realize it might bite them and everyone else on a future date. Even if i have ideas for the first group that I have no power to make reality, I don’t have a solution for the second group either.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Let’s wait until it’s revealed that every commercial us platform is connected…

  • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I tried convincing my friends to leave discord, and only 2 people attempted, but I kind of fucked up by enabling message encryption.

    But now that this bullshit is here, I wonder if I should try again? I might go the VPS route and call it a day, but I really want to have it locally hosted so I don’t have yet another thing to pay monthly.

  • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    If people cared about “the children” they wouldn’t let them on the Internet until they were 21.

    If people cared about humanity they wouldn’t allow “the algorithms” to exist or let social media or news media exist they way it does now.

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If people cared about “the children” they wouldn’t let them on the Internet until they were 21.

      Yeah, that’s only for the people that think they care, but are actually ageist and discriminate.

      Protecting children comes in hand with protecting humanity. The sole existence of predatory algorithms, and other shit makes age meaningless.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      People 18 and over are adults. I know the US somehow forbids adults from drinking but I don’t think more countries should dilute people’s rights.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Even if op’s case was satirical, it is quite ageist honestly. It is the difference between freedom and submission. Such outdated statements about increasing the common age is just a fascist disguise - minors which includes teens have less and less rights just because the belief that children shall be protected by bans is acceptable.

    • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s the solution though, kids (including teens to some extent) can be on the internet but it requires better parenting. It’s better to monitor what they are doing online until they are like 15 or 16, maybe 17 if you have a really good reason too. Limit screen time, be around to answer questions your kid has about what they might see.

      Little kids though? Absolutely should be off the internet. Anyone under 10 shouldn’t be on the internet period in my opinion. 10-12 is kinda a gray zone to me where it’s definitely up to the parents and if they think their child is ready.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        My nephew has a new baby. Her parents are constantly waving their phones in her face; sending pics back and forth; generally doing ‘millenial things’ with their phones when not actively attending the baby. Then proceed to get all freaked out when the baby expresses interest or curiosity in the phone.

        Kids mimic their parents behavior and interests. If you want kids with healthy internet use, you have to have parents model healthy internet use.

      • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Also since they weren’t allowed on the internet till they were 21, those 21 year olds won’t know how to act on the internet. So now there’s 21 year olds roaming around who will need to figure all that shit out. They might get other aspects of being an adult but the internet will be completely alien.

        It’s like when I saw people saying kids shouldn’t be allowed into the grocery store because someone was annoyed that kids didn’t know how to behave there yet. You just create a new and larger problem where adults don’t know how to act.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The internet has been out for less time than some people have been alive. Are we sure we, as a species, know how to be an adult on the internet yet?

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Free speech has been out for as long as humanity has existed, and every attempt at limiting it has ended badly.

            • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Not really. Free speech is a cultural construct. It doesn’t exist without a huge swath of pre-agreed norms regarding rights, speech, freedom, … I’ll have you know, there are modern philosophers who argue against human rights. They would say human rights language pretends to be objective and universal, but it floats without a metaphysical anchor (unlike in the past) and in practice they only exist if a sovereign power recognizes them.

      • Akh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It is far more complicated. The brain develops slowly while social media provides constant dopamine hits leading to doom scrolling and the part of the brain that is tasked with hitting the brakes is just not there

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Doom go outside and doom touch grass. Then later, doom socialize with your family before doom dinner. Cap off the night with a good doom book before doom dreaming the night away.

        • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes social media is a problem, however that alone does not justify banning everyone under 21 from using the entire internet. As the person who I replied to said they wanted.

          Social media is its own problem that’s needs regulations to come under control.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If people cared about “the children” they wouldn’t let them on the Internet until they were 21.

      I faintly recall there were then a few people who criticized Gore’s idea of opening up the Internet to the public.

    • eli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, we should also ban anyone under 25 from voting too! Brain isn’t fully developed! Reeeee!

      • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And anyone over 50, brain is barely functional after 30 years of propaganda.