• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    What “Key features” from an educational course could possibly require windows? It’s spying on you.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    Your operating system Ubuntu, is not supported.

    Click here to upgrade to Arch, btw.

  • Padook@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Its comical that in the last 25 years Linux has gone from a nerd-only tool to something that a 10 year old can install on an air-fryer and still we deal with this bs

  • fennec@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Our website runs on a linux server, can you not use it though

  • epicstove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    bro, my math and calc professor made us use this for our course despite the fact that our college really wants profs to stop using 3rd party sites like these and just use Brightspace.

    It was like $100 CAD too. And it’s a fucking WEBSITE. Why is windows required? Do you need to ring 0 access so I can solve a derivative or something???

  • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Their deliberate word choice of “upgrade” to supported operating system is mildly infuriating.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Right, but that could still be given dynamically by a library as “one of the unsupported ones”, getOSName(). They still might not have hard-coded “Linux is bad”.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          The program has the information, but that doesn’t mean the people that wrote the code felt it was worth their time to make the “upgrade” text inclusive to Linux, if they even considered the possibility of Linux.

        • biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Which will be “If not Windows 11 or Mac os then report os string”. I don’t think they specifically took the time to research different OS’s and list them.

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They’re probably using a third party library to do user agent detection. I doubt anyone ever tested their code on Linux in the first place. They’re probably writing code like “if Windows version >= 10 or macOS version >= 10.14 or Android version > 10 or iOS version > 14” and Linux just happens to fall through because it has none of those versions.

  • beerclue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is like the Apple Business website, which only works in Safari, according to them. Used the User-Agent Switcher plugin, and the website/dashboard works just fine on Firefox in Linux.

  • echolalia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I had this problem with Pearson. I got around it by making sure my bowser (librewolf) reported windows as my user agent. This was last semester for an online intro level course, ymmv

    Edit: I see your other posts about how its not blocking access… Tbh I don’t remember checking, I just remember checking my browser settings haha. Guess I didn’t have to bother.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Pearson has an effective monopoly on teacher certification tests. I don’t understand why private companies get to make up so many of the rules.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    9 hours ago

    How tf do you not support an operating system. Like you gotta go out of your way to detect and block the operating system. Like if you put in 0 effort it would probably work but your company really spent money making their product less accessible for no reason.

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Because Linux doesn’t have any legitimate programs to enforce the DRM on their files, presumably. Plus their .exes/.dmgs for companion tooling won’t work on Linux, unless you’re the kind of person smart enough to bypas this message.

      To be honest, the code generating this message probably just checks if you’re on at least Windows 10 or macOS 14 to make sure their code works, and just echoes back the OS if it’s not supported (Android, iOS). I doubt anyone bothered testing for Linux on their website, let alone care to fix the problem.

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t really disagree with you. It’s dumb to go out of your way to block an OS that probably works just fine.

      That said, the answer is probably “lawyers” and an attempt to limit liability. People rely on the course materials to work. If they don’t want to out the effort into testing to ensure that their software works on Linux, even if it would probably be fine, they may want to limit the possibility of being sued by someone when it somehow screws up their semester.

      So, they out up a soft barrier that says “this may not work right” but let you use it anyway. They have deniability if something goes wrong while the savvy Linux user probably just laughs and changes their user agent.

      Essentially, no one is hurt and the lawyers are happy.

      • tankfox@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The motivation from their side is not wanting to support Linux. There’s a difference between working and supported; support costs them money in terms of every phone call from every person for whom the material doesn’t work correctly, as that means paid trained staff on hand all the time whether you’re having linux issues right now or not. Imagine if one person a year had linux issues, requiring them to hire a full time linux tech with nothing to do but pick up the phone once a year. By putting a roadblock in front that people can get around, it can ‘work’ on that system while they have a leg to stand on to say no to any linux user who wants help they can’t provide.