I read “it’s dying” by people on Discord and Reddit all the time, but the numbers prove otherwise. It’s been going up this entire time and sitting over 3 billion MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS!

I feel like the bubble around people on other platforms saying “who uses Facebook anymore lol” is kind of wild given the numbers. Keep in mind these are active users not just abandoned accounts.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I live in a rural community. Facebook has more or less replaced the web here.

    Businesses post their hours, specials, and information on Facebook. Some of them don’t have websites. The rec centre has a hard time keeping their website up to date, but the Facebook group is always accurate. Newspapers have closed down, so a Facebook group keeps people apprised of what’s going on (it seems to be pretty accurate, since everyone in town is part of it, people involved in events chime in). Kids and adults sports groups advertise and tell their members what’s going on via Facebook groups.

    It’s a shitty medium, since the Facebook algorithm mixes trash advertisements with town-specific events, but it seems to suffice for the town’s needs.

    I suspect it isn’t just my town. The network effect is strong, so I suspect there are niche communities where Facebook is verging on ubiquitous.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      122
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I find this so annoying. I don’t use Facebook, so if you post info about your business on there, I just won’t see it and won’t use your business.

      • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        to look at it objectively, if you don’t use the service you’re simply not part of the demographic targeted by the business employing by that service. That’s mutual.

          • Otter@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            66
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s lazy and stupid

            Another way to say the above would be “simple and easy”. Which is why it’s done by a lot of small businesses that don’t have the expertise (or the funds to hire expertise) to do something better

            If it’s a small town hardware store, it’s easier for them to manage a Facebook page that they can access using their regular Facebook account.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              Good luck to them when Facebook starts throttling their views and demanding money for more exposure. And good luck to them since they don’t show up on Google or yellow pages sites, nor have a website listed on Google maps. Like the other person said above, plenty of people will just do business elsewhere.

              • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Instead of just doing W analysis, why don’t you learn SWOT analysis instead. It will water down your bias.

          • ramble81@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            8 months ago

            Businesses are in the business of running their business, not worrying about FOSS principles and the open web. They can set up a quick information front without having to pay for a webmaster, hosting space, server space, an ISP to handle all that traffic, etc. So why would they care or want to spend the effort otherwise at their size?

              • ramble81@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                What part of “they don’t care” are you having trouble wrapping your head around? They’ll either live with it, or move to another platform that’s easy to use.

                IT is not a core competency of most businesses and their goal is to minimize time to deploy and effort on parts that are not core to their business. If it means spending slightly more then so be it. It’s the “build or buy” problem and since IT isn’t their thing, “buy at the cheapest price possible” is gonna win every time.

              • halva@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                This is real funny because you can get throttled by big corporations even if (or rather especially if) you’re self hosting pretty much the same way

    • sturlabragason@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah I found out the same when I moved back to Iceland. Buying a used car? Renting an apartment? Staying up to date on the parents groups in school, kids sports, any events by any business or group? Contacting any person?

      Being forced to hand over all my personal information just to do any of the above really doesn’t sit well with me 😑

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        It sucks that you need to give them anything, but you don’t have to give them everything, and depending on what information the people you’re interacting with see, the information you give Facebook doesn’t necessarily need to be accurate.

    • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This. In the west among the younger generations, sure, Facebook is outdated/dead. Among other generations, and across much of the world, it is still almost as essential as email.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Zero

      A criticism also stated that Facebook is practicing digital colonialism because it is not introducing open internet but building a "little web that turns the user into a mostly passive consumer of mostly western corporate content”.

      An article by Christopher Mims in Quartz in September 2012 stated that Facebook Zero played a very important role in Facebook’s expansion in Africa over the 18 months following the release of Facebook Zero, noting that data charges could be a significant component of mobile usage cost and the waiving of these charges reduced a significant disincentive for people in Africa to use Facebook.

      To me as a kid with a rudimentary phone and little pocket money, this was also how I got onto and used to access Facebook.

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Kind of reminds me of what AOL was trying to do in the ’90s. If it wasn’t for broadband Internet coming directly from telecom services they might’ve succeeded, too.

        • subtext@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          What else would you call it? It’s them trying to be the face of the internet, the only internet these people know.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Something less dramatic and hilarious probably. Maybe manipulative business tactics.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      This is infuriating to me. The Internet gave every person and every company a completely blank slate from which to represent their identity. A slate owned by no one. Then everyone voluntarily decided that’s too hard and moved everything over to the god awful site that is Facebook. Ugh.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m almost a pariah in my rural area because I refuse to have a Facebook account or an iPhone.

      Gotta be something wrong with that boy, Martha.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup niche communities is spot on. I’m into disc golf but most of the community news and local club updates still primarily occur on FB. This is also an extension of suburban and rural community popularity.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have never been a Facebook user so I’m mostly guessing.

    But I think there was a heyday where people spent a great deal of time on there.

    Now they don’t. They just log on when it’s needed to get ahold of someone or check a specific niche community.

    Thus it’s dying because the ad revenue is way down. It’s in decline not because it lacks users, but because they no longer spend hours there.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This sounds accurate to me. I have an account, and there are certain people that I use Messenger for, but I haven’t updated my status or shared anything in about ten years.

      • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s the same boat as me.

        Messenger and nothing else for 9 years now.

        Reddit killed Facebook for me when i started getting banned for memes etc

        Then reddit killed reddit for me

        • Ellecram@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I started a facebook account in 2006 and stopped using it a few years later. I still have an account but only look at it maybe 2 or 3 times a year.

          I hate when I have to log in to find a business though. It 's infuriating.

          And I hate reddit with the glare of a thousand suns.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      I also wonder what they consider an active user. Would logging in through Facebook to play a mobile game count? What about just logging in through Facebook on any site to get an account on that site? I know I probably check my Facebook once every 3 months to check up on fam but other than that I don’t use it.

    • bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      My brother is in the ICU right now, and everything is being co-ordinated on Facebook. It’s how we are letting people know updates, and how we get a hold of people.

      Facebook is really the only social media platform that lets you find people somewhat easily from their name.

      • morrowind@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not sure that’s a good source. It’s combines a bunch of different sources, and the one for Facebook itself combines a bunch of other sources

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ad revenue is up, because they’ve replaced the feed with 98% ads and sponsored posts. You can’t even see what your friends are posting now. It’s disgusting.

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This. It’s horrible and outright unusable. I used to block each and every “recommended” post/page, after a few weeks they stopped appearing so frequently.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I tried that, but there’s a million more to take their place. A couple days ago there was an ad for a game that was a completely naked woman with her legs spread open as the picture. I reported it and Facebook said they’ve reviewed it and determined it doesn’t violate their community standards, even though exposed nipples are explicitly stated in their standards as a violation. There was an option to request further review and I tried to do that, and of course the submit button was disabled and broken because a trillion dollar company cant even be bothered to build a functional website. I’m fucking done with that site. If I can’t even look for content my actual friends posted without being assaulted with pornography, then I’m done. I wish they’d crash and burn like the dumpster fire they are.

          • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The point isn’t so much to actually block all the garbage, that’s impossible, but to suggest to the Facebook algo to show you less such stuff.

            I’ve also seen people getting semi-pornographic adverts on Youtube, so your experience sounds entirely expected. Putting everything else aside, it’s “funny” how any other smaller independent website or a user on these major websites can and will be sanctioned (the user getting banned, the small website gaining a negative reputation) for hosting/posting pornography, but when a major website shoves pornography right into your face (and probably minors’ too, which is unambiguously illegal) nothing can be done, there is never any sort of uproar or criticism, I doubt you could even report it to some authority…

    • ABCDE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think it’s dying at all, it’s still very popular across the world.

    • cavaloris@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would agree with this. I recently removed Facebook all together but prior, I would only scroll my unseen and log the F out.

  • Hillock@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    8 months ago

    A lot of users are also from poorer countries that lack the means to create their own web infrastructure. Using Facebook to run your business account is easier, cheaper, and more reliable than most alternatives there. Phone carriers and ISP often also have “free”-data for certain social media platforms. You get 1GB+1GB for Facebook/IG/YT/Some Game. So you are stuck in this loop where everything reinforces itself to use Facebook.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      This. Also, FB invested heavily in many of those countries in order to drive up its growth back in the mid 2010s, exactly to ensure that, once the internet finally became widely available for those people, “everything” would be on FB.

      I suspect the majority of those users are from SEA countries.

    • cream@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This! I’m from one of those developing countries and using Facebook is a necessity at this point since everything and everyone is in that platform.

  • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    1. It’s established
    2. It is a general purpose platform: it has personal posting, business listings, messaging, groups, communities, photos, news, clip format video, live streaming, p2p sales, business sales, event coordination and advertising, payment processing and cash sharing, games…
      Most other platforms do one or several of those things much better than FB, but FB is good enough for lots of people. It’s a one stop shop, and it does a fair job at cross pollinating the various aspects of its platform. It has enough stuff to keep to keep users engaged even if their interest wanes from one or more particular platform components.
  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Many overseas countries have Facebook preloaded on a lot of their phones. They also have data caps but Facebook is exempt from counting towards their data cap.

  • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    Facebook was extremely aggressive in getting their software preloaded on all hardware sold in developing areas over the last 20 years. So countries like India (with one and a half billion people by itself) have a large segment of users that think Facebook is the internet. It’s Zucks ultimate walled garden.

    3 billion of those people likely access Facebook for everything that we think of as online. Commerce, social networking, music, videos, it’s all on Facebook.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Exactly. We’ve come full-circle. The likes of AOL, Prodigy, and Compuserve were practically eradicated by the open internet, and it’s taken 30+ years to get even close to clawing it back into some kind of walled garden. But it looks like they’re making progress.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember that, about a decade ago, Facebook including free access to their services on cell phones in India; there was concern and pushback about creating this walled garden monopoly, obviously to no avail.
      My guess is that is why many memes from India from back then involved screenshots of the older generations using Whatsapp as a sort of social network, the subcontinent’s own version of “ok boomer” humor.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The free access to Facebook scheme was killed due to protests, and we now have a net neutrality principle. The workaround FB found was to get smartphone manufacturers to include Facebook as a pre-installed app. And now the government is cracking down on pre-installed apps, so I don’t know what they’ll do next.

    • spiderman@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So countries like India (with one and a half billion people by itself)

      Also old people use Facebook a lot here. It was their first social media and they have settled on that. There are some set of people who are switching to Instagram day by day but the rate isn’t any threat to Facebook.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hate that Facebook marketplace overtook Craigslist because I have a bunch of shit to sell and don’t want to log into my Facebook account to do it.

      • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are so many scams on FB marketplace, it is awful. I tried giving away an old lawnmower and only got people trying to scam me. Or pay them to come get it.

        No, I am not paying you $30 to pick up a still running lawnmower.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        If it’s under 50 lbs just sell it on eBay. Way less hassle, unless your account is brand new, then you’ll have a bunch of scammers trying to message you.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          That might work for a couple things but I’ve got furniture that’s not nice enough for a consignment shop and is upholstered so Goodwill won’t take it.

          Once yard sales start up in the spring I’ll probably drop them off at one and tell the folks they can keep whatever they get for them.

      • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I hate FB marketplace, I’ve stopped buying and selling anything. People don’t show up to buy something, people forgot that they listed something when you contact them.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Craigslist did it to themselves. It was the same old site and whatever annoyed you about it today was what annoyed you 8 years ago. It was full of bots and bad actors and anything beyond buying and selling items was pointless. Go apply for a job? With what a company that was so cheap they posted it for free? Dating? Here are a thousand bots, scammers, and sex workers to choose from. Local activities? Oh look the Karens are racist. Rentals? The price you pay is not the price listed.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    Lotta people keep Facebook for the marketplace.

    Also, a lot of scammers make accounts to use for the marketplace.

    The marketplace fluffs the numbers.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hobby groups. Marketplace. Business page for companies. Everything except its original purpose of keeping up with the lives of your real life friends.

    It’s dying in the sense that no Millenials really uses Facebook the same way we did as when it first started, and most Gen Z would treat having a Facebook page to be a completely alien concept.

    People moved on.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hobby groups

      This is it. FB killed most smaller forums, anyone can make a “group” for any hobby and people can join with an existing account.

      Some bigger forums still thrive, but very few new forums get any traction.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Everything except its original purpose of keeping up with the lives of your real life friends.

      Good. That was always my least favorite part of social media

  • camr_on@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    There are plenty of people for whom Facebook may as well be the entire Internet. Not just demographic groups but entire countries. It’s definitely in decline with the demographic that uses Reddit, Lemmy, and discord – but several billion average users don’t disappear overnight

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It was years ago, but I used to work for a US based ISP. I’m a Canadian and the place I was working at had a contract to suppliment their support team.

    My team did enhanced support, beyond what the ISP would deal with. Basically it was remote geek squad type service for people’s computers.

    While I was working there in the mid 2000’s, there was a Facebook outage. All of Facebook’s services were unavailable. We broke records with how many calls we got that day. Almost all of them went something like this:

    Client: “the internet doesn’t work!” Tech: can you open a browser and… Client (interrupting) “it says page cannot be displayed!!11” Tech: I understand, can you tell me what it says at the top in the address bar? (Insert some explaining of how to find the address bar) Client: “facebook.com” Tech: okay, I want you to click on that and erase it, then type in google.com, hit enter, and tell me what the page says. Client: " it says Google, with a (some bad description of a text entry field)" Tech: this is Google’s website, it loaded from the internet, so your internet works. Facebook is down. Client (without missing a beat): “can you fix Facebook?” Tech: No. (Call ends)

    I’m certain my employer made bank that day, since clients had to pay an extra monthly charge on their internet bill to speak with us, and their support made a point of dumping calls to us whenever they could. If someone wanted to speak to another tech, sure, but you have to buy this service…

    I did not like that job. I actually got a call from an inexperienced Linux user who couldn’t get DNS resolution. I tried to coach him over the phone to determine if his internet was working at all. Before I could actually give him an answer, my manager dropped by (he was monitoring the call) and told me to tell him we could not help him, that the support center only supported Windows based systems, since, out of everyone there, I was the only one with enough Linux knowledge to know what to do, and he didn’t want to give anyone the impression that we could help with Linux.

    All the guy needed to do was change his resolv.conf to valid DNS servers and he would have been fine. It doesn’t work that way anymore, but it did at the time, and I knew it. I did not feel good getting off of that call. It’s like, I have the answer, this guy needs the answer, he paid to speak to me, and I really want to help him out, but I would probably lose my job if I do. I was very blunt with him. I said that I could help him, but I wasn’t allowed to. He understood, but I still felt like shit. I was too timid to realize my worth, which was part of the reason I was there to begin with… Now, I would have just made it clear that he’ll only get help on this once, and when we hung up, never expect to reach me again, and that nobody here knows what I do about this stuff, then helped him anyways. Fuck that manager. I’m so glad I don’t work there anymore.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because people have those family members who insist on doing everything on Facebook Messenger, and that Signal or even fucking Whatsapp is too fiddly for them. So everyone ends up with the lowest common piece of shit network, and it counts them as active users whether they actually use it or not and just happens to be checking for messages in the background.

    • Zoraji@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      That is exactly it for me. I use Messenger to talk to friends and family in Thailand and they refuse to use Signal or Telegram. A few do use Line but 90% will only use FB and Messenger.

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yea but like… why are they allowed to refuse services and you aren’t? Like, I refuse to use whstsapp out of principle (I live in a country where it’s the de facto standard but fuck facebookmeta). Some people I communicate with refuse to use telegram or signal out of convenience. Why should I be the one to budge and give up my principles? I‘m even providing options…

        • guacupado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because you’re the minority. It’s obnoxious to tell everyone to download an additional app just to talk to you. You’re probably not that special.

          • accideath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yea, I’m not. And I’m not telling them they have to download anything. I just tell them I’m not on WhatsApp. And either they use one of the other services, including SMS and e-Mail, or it wasn’t that important. Most people manage.

  • technomad@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I finally deleted mine the other day. No goodbyes, no fanfare, just dumped it like the garbage it is. No regrets.

  • hatsa122@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In most of developing countries (Africa and SEA) is free and dosnt require an active internet connection, so literally everyone with an old phone has access to it

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    And even better question is why people still treat the twelfth most popular social media platform like it’s an indispensable town square?

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because people treat it like it’s an indispensable town square.

      This place is chock full of idealists and techies, it’s easy to lose track of exactly how much sheer “inertia” and habit shape people’s tech choices. And that’s assuming there is a choice at all, maybe you either Facebook up or junior isn’t going to any activities, nobody knows what’s up in the neighborhood, people will either be harder to contact or (partly understandably) look at you like an asocial weirdo, etc

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because Twitter is a very different service to all the bigger ones. The limit on the length of tweets means, that the messages posted have to be to the point, hence they are easy to quote by news of all sorts. That attracts politicans, CEOs and somewhat celbreties to the site, who want to be in the news and it becomes a self enforcing cycle. The eleven larger ones focus either on direct messaging like WhatsApp, Telegram and so forth or have none text media as their dominant form of content like Instagram, YouTube and TikTok.

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know anyone who thinks that or ever has. I doubt it’s gaining any new users anyway. It just that the people already there are stubborn to leave. Me included.