• gtr@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The joke is on you here. Proton is a locked-in CIA honeypot and everybody knows it.

  • Anna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I want another person with neck beard disgusted by both of them using Tor, I2P, Qubes, and GrapheneOS

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    It’s hilarious that OP thought going full in o proton is the other end of the “I love privacy” spectrum. How the fuck are you here on lemmy and that uneducated and ignorant on all this? These are two people a couple of steps away from each other on one end, not even close to what the meme actually is. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if this was rage bait, because it’s dumb enough to be that. Or a proton shill, which definitely exists here.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago
      • Third party service run by corpos who pinky promise not to harvest any of your data

      • In-app tool that doesn’t cache your client-side data

      Is the woman the negative side on this?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I genuinely wonder what people think they’re using a VPN for. Do they think they’ve outwitted a trillion dollars in surveillance with an $8/mo subscription service?

          • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Ummm yes I am betting people think that. Are they wrong? It makes sense that Google could do that if they really wanted to, but I doubt they do pretty much anything that doesn’t have a profit motive.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What? I always thought the guy was the negative side! The woman is the reasonable normie, the guy is the weirdo tinfoil hat nerd!

      What even are all those crappy icons?

      • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This meme format is inherently sexist. Anytime you have a meme format that has both a man and a woman on it, and one side is going to be the “bad” side, it’s always going to bring out the biases of whoever is creating it.

        • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          35 minutes ago

          1 Semantics, but that doesn’t sound “inherently” sexist to me.

          2 I’m pretty sure it just makes more comedic sense to put the unexpected interpretation on the right (or women’s side), so the “bad side” is different depending on the topic. I personally see this meme more often with the man being a surface level fan of something with the women being unexpectedly deep into the fandom. Like, among the earliest known edits (according to knowyourmeme) is the man just liking sports games with the women liking soulslikes.

        • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          They are literally just looking at each other. If anything she has a more annoyed look on her face. He’s thirsty af and shes rolling her eyes at him.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      i think I’ve seen a lot of cases when it’s the other way round.

      although if we do the statistics it’ll likely show a bias.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If it were the other way around, would it be sexist?

          Is it required that any meme with a “good” and “bad” side have no demographic distinction between the sides?

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            59 minutes ago

            It’s not that this one example is like this, it’s that it seems to always be one way around and not the other, with this meme format

          • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yes, it would still be sexist if it were the other way around. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a meme with this format which didn’t have a “good” and “bad” side.

            • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I’m genuinely curious what you’d think if they were both thin white straight-coded average-height women but with different hair color.

              • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Well, it would be difficult for a format like that to bring out the biases of meme creators.

                One of the reasons this meme format is problematic is that this is a screenshot from “500 Days of Summer” which was a film that was wildly misunderstood by misogynists. The entire point of the film is to show the perspective of the male character, which villainizes the female character when she breaks his heart when she dumps him. But by the end of the movie the viewer is supposed to realize that she did nothing wrong and just wasn’t as in to him as he was into her.

                Incels and misogynists everywhere misunderstood the hell out of the themes and message. So it’s not a great movie to take a meme format from.

      • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        The biggest threat is that the CEO is pro maga (cue defenders saying “well ackshully”) and thinks trump is better for his business (cue tankie both sidesers).

        The other threat is that at some point proton gave an IP address or something obtained through a legal france->swiss court order allowing french ACABs to hunt and skin the most dangerous game: journalists

        Edit, activist I guess https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/360793/protonmail-criticised-sharing-activists-ip-address-law-enforcement

        • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Okay, so about #1: Is there more to it than him setting of one single post praising Trump’s business skills? I mean, that’s pretty stupid, but stamping him as “Pro-MAGA” for that seems a bit far fetched still.

          About #2: That’s also concerning and pretty bad as it reads, but any company basically has to abide the country’s laws, so if Interpol orders the Swiss police to fetch the data, no legally operating company can really do anything about it or they’re gone as well. A similar thing happened to Tutanota in Germany, iirc.

          • SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 minutes ago

            about #1: you see, your point is already defeated, because he called you a “defender saying actually”

            ofc, you are right, and everyone saying that Proton ceo is pro maga from that one statement has reading comprehension problems

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          🤔 why is the privacy thing not the biggest threat? I would think that the privacy one would be more of a threat to privacy than the political stuff. Is that not the case?

          • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I don’t know how you can, with a straight face, separate “political” and “privacy” stuff. They are intrinsically linked.

            The amount of hoops needed to make the IP address thing, which is just IP address, happen…massive

            • percent@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Sure, I can imagine the political issues could lead to privacy issues. My question was not about whether or not that’s true[1]. I was simply wondering why a possible privacy issue would rank higher than the actual issue that has already happened.


              1. Something more specific/objective might be helpful though. Saying he’s “pro maga” is like saying he’s “bad vibes”; it requires the reader to just take your word for it without knowing exactly why. But, again, my question was more about the ranking ↩︎

              • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I just don’t think the IP address is a big deal. A category 5 probably outranks a definite tropical depression.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No matter who someone is, don’t give them all of your personal property.

    I use Protonmail from Proton. That’s it.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I spent a couple hours setting up my accounts and keys and syncing them across devices so that I could access my secure email from any of them, importing them into K9 and thunderbird and publishing my public keys to a keyserver. Once I verified it was all working I realised that no one else I know uses PGP with email and it was a giant waste of time

      • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I only use one subscription service in my life and it’s email from proton. I once knew a sysadmin who said that self-hosting email is a full-time job. So I just pay for my email with a reputable company and have my own domain name attached. His comment scared me off for good. But other people have said it’s not that hard. Please write me your experience , ok?

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The company could flip any time but for now their products are pretty good as a google alternative. I use the calendar, mail, cloud, contacts and vpn app and have zero complaints. Plus they couldn’t access any of my data if they wanted to.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The thing is, it’s not true about any E2E encryption where all parts of the codebase are controlled by the company.

          It could be as simple as updating their website to send your password to them in plain text while logging in, now the encryption is useless as they would have your password.

    • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      i trust them more than google. they’ve been a little sketchy lately (bc of the ai stuff, not the ceos political stuff) but at least only one entity has my data this way. I’d rather self-host but i can’t rn.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        19 hours ago

        they’ve been known to collaborate with governments and have been accused of forcing traffic through an Israeli contractor. i can’t trust them.

  • Switorik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In guessing the left is Proton but those icons are about as bad as googles.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They might have actually somehow managed to come up with worse logos than Google uses. I assume the top one is an email app, the bottom left is a file manager, and bottom centre is a password manager? But I’m less than certain about those, and everything else is a complete mystery.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Its amazing, in an era where our phones have higher res than monitors did 20 years ago, icons have less detail.

        Like show a damn calendar for the calendar icon. Hell, the ANSI emoji would be better. 📆

      • Humanius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        From top left to bottom right, horizontal first:

        • Email
        • Password Manager
        • Calendar
        • VPN
        • Drive
        • Authenticator
        • Mascot for their LLM

        The only ones that are a bit ambiguous are the Password Manager and the VPN logos imo

        • drath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago
          • Napkins

          • Square turned sideways

          • Square not turned sideways

          • Triangle

          • Folder

          • Half-eaten donut hanging on a doorknob

          • Cat

          How was I supposed to infer the meaning of those?

          • Bongles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago
            • an envelope but like, without the top
            • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
            • calendars are kind of this shape and this has 31, a day of the month in it
            • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
            • folder, it’s their drive app, were you keep files and folders. This one’s actually not that bad.
            • the keyhole is used in damn near every password manager, and when it’s not a key it’s a shield of some sort.
            • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            (This whole reply is mostly /s)

  • ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Design brief: Make them look like the google suite but purple. The harder it is to work out what the app does from the logo, the better.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Meh…the mail, calendar and drive icons are easily recognizable for what they do. The others are easily recognizable and distinguishable from each other, although their function definitely is less clear from the visuals of the icon. This is true for most apps by far though, not just google and proton. Most icons by far makes the company behind it identifiable, not the function it performs.

      • dontsayaword@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Gotta disagree. At a glance they are all just purple blobs. Sure you can tell if you look closely, but you shouldn’t have to.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I disagree, you don’t have to look closely at all to get the function of several, unless you consider 1-2 seconds looking closely of course…

          • dontsayaword@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            20 hours ago

            unless you consider 1-2 seconds looking closely of course…

            I do - It should be recognizable in a glance (milliseconds, not seconds). Maybe it sounds minor, but I work in design and let me tell you it makes a big difference.

      • ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Now that you’ve mentioned calendar I’m guessing it is the one with 31 on it? Honestly didn’t know what it was at first glance, thought it was maybe something to do with window management as it sorta looks like a browser window or something. Still don’t know how it is supposed to look like a calendar other than it having a 31 on it

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Both aren’t really private. Both is a for-profit company claiming it to be private.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        No. Proton is a for profit company whose largest shareholder is a non profit foundation. As is written right in your linked post. The foundation is not the company.

        • Dew@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh. Didn’t know lol. I just saw Proton blabla non-profit blabla and jumped to a conclusion too fast like I always do 🥴

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Which isn’t a bad thing, actually. Being a non-profit can make it hard to expand in some cases, but what makes for-profit companies shit is the shareholders calling for the upward going line, which isn’t the motivator of the shareholder here.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      For-profit company and private are not mutually exclusive though. Mullvad VPN for example is as much a for-profit company as unlike proton which is nonprofit, and arguably also one of the most private VPN services available.

      • greenacres3233@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Proton was created to serve the world, and the non-profit Proton Foundation ensures that this can never change. As Proton’s primary shareholder, the foundation exercises its control to ensure that Proton does not deviate from our mission to build a better internet that serves the interests of all of society.

        Edit: meaning, there’s a difference between the foundation and the company