• bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    Everything-as-a-service is annoying but I think this hypothetical app would probably have still been less expensive than my marriage

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    It’s funny how many of my choices are made based on whether I can do something on a website vs. being forced to make a phone call. Currently, I’m looking for a vet to get my cat spayed, and all the ones close to me require a phone call, so I’m contemplating a longer drive for an appointment I can schedule online vs. having to call to make the appointment.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    And a similar app where ADHD folk pays someone (anyone, but preferably someone with ADHD) to start a simple step of a task (we got it from there).

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I only use online services to order food delivery to avoid the phone calls. And for some restaurants this actually means that an employee of the online service will call and tell them what I ordered.

    Now I wonder if these services have a record of the main languages spoken at the restaurants and try to match up agents that speak that language.

  • veroxii@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hire a virtual assistant. They can make the calls for you and will cost you about $10 to $25 per hour. They can also organise all kinds of other things for you.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s only the wife’s job if the husband makes calls for her, too. (In a hetero relationship, of course.)

      At least, for me. I do and have made calls for partners, and they’ve made calls for me too. I gel best with other introverts, so we take turns when one of us doesn’t have the energy to make a phone call. No need to gender it, it’s what supportive partners do for each other.

      • cuerdo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I just gender it because it is my case, but it is true that it depends on each case. It is easier for me sometimes, it is easier for her others.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Thank you for clarifying. Women often get tasked with extra emotional labor, so I wasn’t sure which way your post was going at first. I withdraw my downvote and wish you a lovely day!

          • cuerdo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            This is the recurring problem i have between generalization and discrimination.

            For example, women are, on average, more sociable, but that generalization can harm women who do not fit the majority. The same applies to men, who are often expected to be quieter or less expressive, which can be isolating for those who are not.

            I don’t think generalizations are not inherently bad—they help us describe and understand patterns—but they are risky for exactly the reasons you point out.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      It kind of bothers me that people use “introvert” to mean like “crippling social anxiety and agoraphobia”.

      Maybe it’s just online spaces accumulate more people who identify with those disorders, and “introvert” sounds nicer .

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I mean… do you expect the results of these calls to be… good?

    'Cause like, if your standards for the outcome of these calls aren’t too high, then just go down to the nearest bar and buy some half-drunk guy another round to make the call for you.

    On the bright side, you probably won’t be obligated to call that person again!

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No it would be via IM. You connect, go to a secure chat room, share necessary info, and then the call can commence.

      Problem would be that you would have to blindly trust all participants.

  • ideonek@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Somewhere some introvert would be paying extrovert to call you… an introvert.

    What have you done?