• tackleberry@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    You should see how AI is being deployed in warfare. Plausible deniability is about to go through the roof.

    Back in the day, you get out jail free card was on a scale of “the devil made me do it” to “I was following orders”, now we get “It was AI”

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Most pointed questions you type will start a Google search1. This loads a regular search results page, and sees Firefox’s AI chatbot shift to a sidebar on the right. The AI reads the top results (including any AI overview), and produces a response based on them.

    AI reads AI reading AI reading AI reading AI reading…

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Seeing AI invade open source is sad. AI slop contributions. AI integration that no one asked for.

    For now Firefox derivatives are fine (I use LibreWolf), but many of those derivatives don’t work on macOS because it “fails to verify that this executable is actually executable” (what does that actually mean?????????).

    I had hopes for Ladybird Browser but now it’s being vibe coded (rewritten in rust by ai for no reason whatsoever), and it’s not ready yet anyway. Now I’m hopeful for Servo engine. It’s in development but at some point it will be ready, and it bans slop contributions.

    • suckdings@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      For now Firefox derivatives are fine (I use LibreWolf), but many of those derivatives don’t work on macOS because it “fails to verify that this executable is actually executable” (what does that actually mean???)

      Not sure if this is what you’re experiencing, but it’s a common thing. Happens to me too, I have to run a command after I update from Homebrew.

      LibreWolf FAQ: why is LibreWolf marked as broken?

      It is possible that Apple Silicon users see their recently downloaded LibreWolf flagged as broken or unsafe by the OS.

      This happens because we do not notarize the macOS version of the browser: we don’t have a paid Apple Developer license and we don’t want to support this signing mechanism that is put behind a paywall without providing significant gains.

      You can remove the quarantine attribute from the Application using this command:

      xattr -dr com.apple.quarantine /Applications/LibreWolf.app
      
  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Do yourself a favour and use LibreWolf or WaterFox instead.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Or just keep using Firefox and don’t use the entirely optional and opt-in features you don’t need. The same as always.

      I’m completely flabbergasted why people get their panties in a twist over

      • completely local features that happen to be backed by machine learning models (the translation feature is a huge privacy win over sending your text to Google translate)
      • opt-in LLM integration that nobody forces you to use
    • ken@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Or further favourable: Konform Browser.

      Tor Browser and Mullvad Browser also worthy mentions.

  • DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So sad for Firefox. I try to keep using since it’s the only solution free of Chromium, but I guess chromium will control everything only Safari will not be chromium.

      • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Ladybird is being rewritten in Rust by AI for no reason whatsoever. Browsers should be secure, and vibe coding prevents security.

        Currently I am hopeful for Servo. Its development is not as far along, but it seems way saner. It bans AI contribution, and it’s intended to be very performant.

      • DeckPacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ladybird is pretty much dead to me, firstly because the dev has some really bad right wing vibes (he said gender inclusive language is too political for his docs and retweeted a Nazi on Twitter). And secondly because the started using AI to move the code to Rust to make it more secure, which is insane if you know anything about AI or security.

        My current hope is in servo, because they have much more capable maintainers and the project seems to make some good progress. Also they have daily builds on their website for every operating system, so you can already try it out easily (but don’t expect everything to work right now, they still need some time).

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Seems like the goal of Servo is to be used for embedded applications rather than as a full fledged browser. Is the idea that someone else will build a full browser on top of servo?

        • ATPA9@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I tried out the servo alpha on android and it is surprisingly usable for something so early in development

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Ladybird is gonna be awesome, you are overblowing things, it’s an open source project chill out. Also sevro is not currently really being designed as a desktop web browser. Its a web engine for light weight embedded applications. Ladybird is currently the only in development webbrowser that is primarily designed with desktop main browser use as its intended use.

          And I know you aren’t a fan but in the next 5 years pretty much every piece of software you touch will have code from an LLM in it, so get over it or stop using software.

        • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I won’t use < insert FOSS Project > because of political vibes.

          I see this shit almost everyday. Absolute npc behaviour.

          • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            NPC behavior is not having any sense of morality and the backbone to take a stand, but I get it, it’s far more comfortable to just put your head in the sand and consume

            • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Consume what exactly in this context?

              Also you self righteous people still didn’t tell me why you won’t use the browser expect for vibes so I don’t really feel bad for “consuming”

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yea I just don’t get it for open source software, like you aren’t supporting their agenda by using the free fucking software

              • B3rn4yy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                True lmao xD

                Man I sure do love identity politics and having software and tech in general be somehow associated with political movements. I don’t give fuck about this shit.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I did not know about the AI stuff. However, I do think that the “inclusion” controversy is way overblown. Why in the world would you need to have “gender inclusive language” in the docs for a browser engine?

          • blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            That ladybird gender thing is such a load of crap. I find it hard to even believe that people are genuinely passionate about it. Every time ladybird is mentioned, someone brings up the ‘extreme views’ based on this. But it is the biggest load of nothing you are ever likely to see.

            For anyone who doesn’t know, here’s what happened:

            • The build documentation for this unreleased pre-beta software used the pronoun ‘he’.
            • Someone suggested that they change it to be more inclusive.
            • The author didn’t think it was important enough to change, so left it.
            • More requests and pressure came to change the pronoun.
            • The pronoun was then changed, and the author apologised.

            To me, that’s a minor error of judgement, with no lasting harm caused to anyone at all. But yet somehow this is constantly used as a reason to avoid ladybird.


            How can I take this seriously? Is this some kind of organised anti-competition propaganda campaign? We’re talking about a free and open source project of a highly technical nature, and somehow people are upset that the word ‘he’ existed temporarily in a work-in-progress document with a target audience of essentially zero people. The people making this project are not political leaders or public figures with media training. They are focused on the technical side of things. Yeah, the pronoun was a mistake, but it pretty much the smallest mistake you could possibly make in this context. It not like they are donating to right-wing orgs, or publicly denouncing anyone, or promoting hate. I see far worse than what they did on a daily basis from all sorts of people - including right here in lemmy. And in terms of ladybird, I have not heard of any kind of misstep ever since this instant - which was a very long time ago now. It is honestly bizarre that people have clung onto this incident. I’m honestly not sure I believe that the backlash is entirely organic. It’s just too disproportionate.

            [edit] Let me just follow this by saying that I do think there are other good reasons to be upset with this same ladybird dev. I just don’t think the ‘he’ in the docs thing is anything at all.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              For anyone who doesn’t know, here’s what happened:

              except you forgot to mention some fucking crucial steps, like harshly calling it as politics and sending everyone to a warmer climate, and locking the issue to prevent further discussion

            • cepelinas@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Could it be posibble the authors first language is gendered, because this sounds like something I would say in Lithuanian like when I talk about computers I use he because the word has a male gender.

          • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Or we could ask the question in the opposite direction - why would you use language which excluded anybody who doesn’t identify as male from the documentation for an open-source project, to the point where when someone offers to update the language for you your response is to rant about “personal politics” and write a contribution policy which forbids the use of gender-neutral language?

            • potustheplant@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Apparently Kling was against using “they” instead of “he”. While I do agree that it’s wrong and gender neutral terms should be used, I wouldn’t “cancel” the guy over it. Afaik they are using gender neutral terms now.

              The other stuff about Kling mentioned at the bottom of your link is worrying though. It’s a shame a project as important and necessary as Ladybird was created by a person like him :(

            • Zetta@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Good thing it’s an open source project so it doesn’t really matter at all what you think of someone working on it imo

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Much like Adobe‘s Acrobat which I also have to use for work. At least from what I can tell when it suddenly summarizes a PDF. There‘s no way in hell that happens locally. But the fact that it seemingly automatically processes potentially sensitive data from customers didn‘t even do as little as raising eyebrows when I brought it up.

    • Analog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No way in hell? My understanding is that an NPU could perform that type of processing locally. I welcome info & correction!

      (I know other types of local ai processors could too, but there’s little chance Acrobat would be geared to look for them - even GPUs - unlike NPUs.)

      Now if we switch to talking about policy instead of capability, I don’t think Adobe would miss a chance to be evil. So yeah they’re probably stealing all the data they possibly can.

        • Analog@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          True! More all the time, unfortunately. (Unfortunately because we’re paying for tech we don’t want.)

          Also doesn’t negate my argument. He said no way in hell, yet… not only is there a way but it’s already out there.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I use Firefox as a PDF reader at work. it’s better than Adobe Reader or Chrome, and it’s good enough, so I haven’t bothered finding something else.

      I deal with secure information sometimes, in PDF form. I haven’t even considered that this information might not remain local.

    • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If your company has an enterprise/privacy agreement with Adobe, it might be considered addressed, similar to the millions of companies using Microsoft 365 and Sharepoint.

      If, OTOH, it’s a “free” feature of Adobe, it could be eating your company’s data without constraints.

      If the latter, let us know your company’s name so that we can avoid it.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      …and we’ll all suffer as climate change increases. None of this shit is worth frying for.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Donald Trump is the most environmentalist president ever. With oil prices as they are, can you imagine how much less oil we’re burning?

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Nah, it’s just imperialist billiards, big vs little.

          It’s all part of “the great game” the west has been playing against Russia in the middle east for over a century… The middle east is where America does it’s proxy wars.

          World wars are only a risk if a white European country is attacked. Horrendous how those in power see the world, isn’t it?

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      thier revenue entirely dependent on google, you can see why, they got lazy and dint spend time developing thier browser.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Relevant section:

    Smart Window uses ‘memories’, things Mozilla says “…it learns from your activity” to inform its responses.

    You can delete memories individually, and you can set any given chat session to not use/store them.

    Fine so far.

    The problem? My memory list isn’t populated with things Smart Window learned since I enabled it. Oh no.

    It has activity going back months. We’re talking searches and website interactions from long before I enabled this. features.

    Firefox just handed that history to the AI models to plough from, without telling me upfront.

    I found this the creepiest aspect of Smart Window.

    Mozilla says this was a flub; it will refine the onboarding around Smart Window to limit memory formation to post-opt-in activity only. That’s obviously the right fix.

    Because sharing a user’s prior browsing history with third-party AI models, silently, on feature activation, without any headset? Yeah, a bit icky – but that’s the price of testing features that are finished, I guess.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m willing to give them a pass since this was a development build and while someone probably should’ve thought of it, it’s the kind of bug that can happen. If this was the public release it would be a lot more outrageous.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Finding out about this gives me some extra questions, though.

        • Was this data summarized on enabling this window, or before?
        • Did it use an existing model, or re-use one that someone may have already downloaded for a different feature?
        • Is this activity going anywhere else, like Mozilla’s recent “privacy-preserving” advertising?
        • When this does release, what will the default be?
    • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There’s also an option to bring your own LLM, with fields for model name, endpoint, and API token available for entry when the manual option is enabled. However, the page itself warns local models may not work correctly.

      It looks like there’s an option for people to self-host too. You won’t have to send your history to someone else’s computer.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If it’s anything like how they handled the AI sidebar, this option is going to get hidden before it hits production.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Hey, I’m not excited about more stuff getting added into an already overflowing Firefox (why not an extension?!), but if they must promote AI choice, I’m with you: actually allow user choice.

            (Based on how Mozilla has added two unrequested search engines while ignoring a request to add StartPage, the “choice” thing seems to boil down to backroom deals.)

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The problem with Firefox doing AI is theyre one foot out always. The features they add are always undercooked compared to the rest of the market. This looks really shit and useless in its current state like a worse version of perplexity browser.

    • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      All AI is undercooked: Errors are baked into LLMs and there is no viable solution to prevent the mistakes and outright bullshit they produce other than to assume it fucked up and pay an actual expert manually check literally everything it does.

      • Analog@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Errors are baked in but I don’t agree with the “no viable solution” part. One research team actually was able to identify the “neurons” responsible for hallucinations and adjust the contribution to negligible amounts.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ONwQzauqkc (Linking a youtuber instead of the actual study because he summarizes it pretty well and the research itself is not geared for laypersons.)

        If this was implemented industry wide would it completely solve the problem? I don’t know, but I do know it would be a massive improvement.

        • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I remain deeply skeptical.

          Either way, it uses a ridiculous amount of power and comes at great environmental cost.

          • Analog@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Fuck me, you and people in general jump to conclusions so easily. My post was meant to educate, to shore up knowledge. To help out.

            In no way was I saying “AI is good and the tech bros are right about it.” 🤦‍♂️

            • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I never took what you wrote to mean that, but I am deeply skeptical that they can successfully elminiate hallucinations to the point that “AI” can be trusted to given correct results.

              • Analog@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Why bring up power and environmental cost? What did that have to do with anything?

                Also if you’ll re-read what I wrote I used careful language to indicate I didn’t think this method would completely eliminate errors. Nevermind bridge the gap to “trusted.” (🤮 I will never trust AI.)

                (Yeah I know the YouTuber used a sensational title; in their defense they kind of have to in order to get clicks. imho blame the algorithm and people’s reinforcement of that algorithm.)

                • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Why wouldn’t I? It’s pretty fucking important! Why would you take exception to that? I also think it’s weird you assumed what conclusion I was jumping to.

  • TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    F*** I really dont want to change away from Firefox. Pleas be good Firefox. Please! Don’t F this up.

    • Godort@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Librewolf is exactly the same browser with all the security features dialed to 11 and all the AI removed.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I tried Librewolf for a while and found it to be a bit too much for me when all I really want is Firefox without AI. The privacy options are probably great but not for me.

          Just installed waterfox. First impression is that I am super happy to be bock to the previous Firefox theme - it takes less space and looks nicer in my opinion. Seems promising. Thanks for the recommendation! :)

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The latest Firefox release added a button that does exactly what you want. Turns off AI everywhere.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Yeah, I returned to FireFox after the latest release because of the kill switch. Still I’m uncomfortable with using software that’s full of stuff that I hate, even if it’s disabled. This is not really rational I guess, just me being weird.

        • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah Librewolf does go really fucking hard on security/privacy to the detriment of functionality, but the are upfront with that so you shouldn’t be going in completely blind. I think Water Fox is a nice happy medium for users that don’t want to fuck around with technical stuff.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It might be easier to soften Librewolf than harden Firefox, but fair point.

          If you’re a relatively normal user and you still want to use LibreWolf, I would recommend:

          • disable fingerprinting
          • not clearing history on exit

          Most of this is easy to find, especially thanks to the LibreWolf menu

          • eli@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yeah it’s all just in the GUI to enable and disable what you don’t want.

            I don’t get what people are complaining about with LibreWolf being “too hard”. Like it’s 1 minute clicking through menus and you’re done. 5 minutes if you need to read and search things up real quick.

            But LibreWolf, ublock installed by default, and then set up containers. Just pure bliss.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              For us, sure. For the average Joe who doesn’t know about the side effects of fingerprinting, not so much.

            • deleted@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              It broke youtube for me yesterday and mind you I’m a web developer and I didn’t know what broke it exactly to turn it on/off.

              It fixed it self today though.

              • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                16 hours ago

                That was almost certainly YouTube breaking itself. They do a lot of public A-B testing without notifying the user of anything, even if it could break functionality.

                The chances of Librewolf breaking, and updating in 24 hours is basically zero. Especially if you’re on Windows since it doesn’t update itself, you have to choose to install the separate updater application when you install Librewolf, otherwise it just doesn’t update.

                https://codeberg.org/librewolf/librewolf-winupdater

                https://librewolf.net/docs/faq/

                How often do you update LibreWolf?

                LibreWolf is always based on the latest version of Firefox. Updates usually come within three days from each upstream stable release, at times even the same day. Unless problems arise, we always try to release often and in a timely manner.

                It should however be noted that LibreWolf does not have auto-update capabilities, and therefore it relies on package managers or users to apply them.

                • deleted@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Yeah I agree it was probably a/b testing since I use ublock origin as well so I’m use to this kind of stuff.

                  But the point I’m trying to make that I didn’t know at that time librewolf would have settings turned on that could break some websites.

              • eli@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                To be fair, YouTube is a giant piece of shit. On mobile, IronFox and Firefox are terrible with it, but switching to Chrome and everything loads instantly.

                We all know Google is purposely slowing down non-chrome browsers.

            • Nelots@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Maybe, but if you want Librewolf but less extreme, that’s what Waterfox is for. May as well just install that and avoid the 5 minute search. And this is coming from a long time Librewolf user.

          • fizzle@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I just enable canvas on sites that need it.

            Thats the only part of RFP that I find problematic.

        • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It only breaks sites because RFP is on by default and some greedy sites dont like RFP. You can just turn it off and use a good user agent mask (if you care about fingerprinting)

          • Nelots@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It can cause issues with default settings on the occasional site.

            Since I had it on hand, here's a screenshot of what I encountered when playing Jackbox with friends. All images would look like this.

            MlYJ6D0Bnz8fAUv.png

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I remember having ff and then switching to chrome because it was better, and then switching back to ff because it was better. I’m ok leaving ff again.

  • mintiefresh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Waterfox. Librewolf. Zen. Floorp.

    They’re all good options in their own ways. Just pick one and go

    • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Have you seen the better browsing experience? It’s on Zen. It’s literally on Librewolf. It’s on Floorp without ads. It’s literally on Waterfox. You can probably find it on Ironfox. Dude it’s on Ladybird. It’s a Servo original. It’s on GNOME Web. You can browse on GNOME Web. You can go to GNOME Web and browse it. Epiphany has it for you. </joke>

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There’s a master “kill switch” for all AI features in Firefox now. I suggest everyone who’s concerned about this kind of thing just go and turn it off, and then we need never bother each other over this again.

    • LostWanderer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s still opt out, not opt in because on first install that LLM garbage is enabled by default. The kill switch should’ve been for people that chose to try LLM garbage and found it lacking; needing an easy way to disable it all.

      I won’t stop complaining until Firefox makes their LLM nonsense opt-in, letting a user choose at first boot if they want that shit or not. That would be the most ethical and user respecting way to handle their LLM shit.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ehh, it’s all local models. I don’t really see the harm in that. It’s just new features like any other.

        • LostWanderer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s still a problem because users are opted in, as I’ve mentioned in many replies…If users don’t push back, we get situations like Microsoft and their insane LLM shit being shoved in all their software/services/OS. It’s the same “normalize and numb” tactics used by corporations to make end users more compliant to their forced integration of features in software, that aren’t the best or helpful to that end user. It’s not okay, nor is this an ordinary new feature. LLMs are being used to do a lot of disgusting things in the world by the ultra-wealthy and techbros wanting to control/influence the masses.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “When it comes to privacy, defaults matter.”

      - Mozilla

      Why not remove the AI and offer them as a separate extension? That way you’re happy, and everybody else doesn’t have crap shoved down their throats.

    • chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Or pick a Firefox fork that doesn’t have the AI bullshit. Libre Wolf is great for people who take security very seriously,l. I hear Water Fox is a much closer equivalent to Firefox without AI, and also has a focus on privacy. I’ve also been using Iron Fox on my android with basically no issues.

      With Mozilla’s current track record I don’t trust them to not fuck with the AI “killswitch”.

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The only thing stopping me from switching is the unreliability of updates to uBlock on forked versions of Firefox.

        • Dultas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I’ve been using Waterfox for months and not had a single issue with ublock origin or any other extension.

    • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Till those options are turned off by the browser updating like has already happened with some people.