Left is the DQ near my office. Consistently does that. Right is the DQ in the next town over.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    As a European just let me say wow.

    This is wrong on so many levels. And I assume you’re not aware of half of them.

      • cazzmaniandevil@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Aside from the environmental impact of driving 10 (!) Extra miles (or at all) for a tiny bit of extra ice cream, which is neither healthy nor needed. It just doesn’t make sense on a personal financial level to waste so much gas to get a cheaper (per volume) treat. For a European driving to get ice cream alone is ridiculous as many placed have ice cream shops in the town we live in that we walk or bike to.

        • Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Adding to that, it’s not even icecream but a industrial replacement of (likely) dubious quality.

          So one could get more in better quality cheaper if consumed regularly.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Oh, I thought they were taking about the ice cream itself as if it had some ungodly ingredients and sprinkles of human rights violations. Now I feel silly.

          Thank you!

    • oscarmeyer82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As a Canadian, lol.

      I hope I’m aware of at least 3/4’s of the levels of wrongness. We’re pretty influenced by American culture but still have our own identity. It seems to be fading a bit with time but I remember travelling to the US and thinking why is the yogurt so sweet? Why is the bread sweet?

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No, I don’t need all those extra calories. I also would eat at a local shop instead.

  • binarytobis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Tbh I don’t really need the full blizzard anyway, most of my enjoyment comes from the first several bites then the rest I finish out of inertia. I’d rather have half the size twice as often, from a calorie-counting perspective.

    Also you could just buy a bigger size with your gas savings if you really needed it.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So both are wrong.

    The one on the left is too low. It needs to be, at the minimum, at about the rim.

    The one on the right is too high. You can’t put a flat lid on it, and if you put a tall lid and it melts even a little, you end up with a mess on your hands. Blizzards aren’t cones with drip rings (the holes in the top of the wafers, which is why they shouldn’t be covered up), they’re supposed to stay in the cup.

    Source: was a DQ Store Manager 20 years ago, went to DQ School (yes that’s real… or at least it was).

  • Switorik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re at the lesser DQ, you could pay a couple extra bucks and upgrade it to the next size up. You would save from having to buy a gallon of gas if you’re not electric and 20 minutes.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The current GSA mileage rate is $0.7/mi. This rate is pretty for accurate building in the cost of driving a typical car- gas, tires, oil, the car itself, etc.

      That trip cost at least $7, if 10 miles of travel includes the return.

      So no, I wouldn’t.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        5% butterfat vs 10% butterfat for the FDA standard.

        Whatever. People write “it’s not ice cream” like it’s plastic.

        • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The FDA is BARE MINIMUM, not quality. If you can’t make the bare quality, Im comfortable asserting its not that food item, much less a desirable one.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            49 minutes ago

            The amount of butterfat says absolutely nothing about quality.

            Is whole milk not a “quality food item” because it’s only 3.25% butterfat?

            Edit: I forgot the quality adjective which confused some.

            • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              No one said it’s not a food item, just that it doesn’t quailify as ice cream. Similary Ireland ruled against Subway calling their “bread” bread for the same reason, it doesn’t pass the standards to qualify as that specific food item.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                50 minutes ago

                It’s a label so consumers know what they are buying. It has absolutely nothing to do with quality.

                Gelato from the best restaurant in Italy is higher quality than Dairy Queen despite having lower butter fat content.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It’s not ice cream. They didn’t say not a food item. They said not that food item. It isn’t ice cream if it can’t meet that incredibly low bar. If they want me to call it ice cream, they can make a small amount less in profit and deliver a better product. Until then, it’s an ice dessert to recognize it’s subpar quality.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                ice dessert to recognize it’s subpar quality.

                The amount of butterfat says absolutely nothing about the quality of a food item.

                Gelato from the Cremeria Cavour in Bologna is higher quality than Turkey Hill despite Turkey Hill having more butter fat.

                • tal@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  A sorbet or an Italian ice doesn’t have butterfat at all, because neither contain dairy.

                  I think that it’d be hard to convincingly claim that an ice cream intrinsically is higher quality than a sorbet or Italian ice.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  It tells you something about the quality of ice cream. Yeah, it doesn’t tell you about the quality compared to a totally different product, but if you are comparing “ice cream” quality then it is an objective measure of quality.

          • jawa21@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Nah. FDA definitions exist to make large corporations more money. There isn’t much else to it.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              This except the complete opposite… :p

              The FDA definitions and regulations cost corporations money, because they need to produce what they claim.

              History lesson, pre-FDA a large corporation got caught selling thickened yellow sugar water as honey… The kicker was they would put a dead bee in each bottle to sell the fraud.

              FDA, EPA and other larger government regulating agencies aren’t perfect but jesus was shit crazy bad before them.

              (Another fun example, look up the Ohio river fire. Yes, the companies literally dumped enough shit into the river, it caught fire.)

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I wouldn’t go that far. Even labeling what should be called ice cream is good. The problem is not understanding the regulations that cause people to make judgements that have nothing to do with quality.