Personally I love oranges but cant stand orange juice.

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    English mustard with pork, Dijon with beef. The exception to this rule is that American mustard is acceptable on hotdogs and burgers.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    People shouldn’t be able to be told what color to paint their house. More people should experiment with wild colors inside and out.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 minutes ago

      i see they are pressured into painting colors that are similar to neighborhood houses, to "maintain some arbitrary value.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The use of ‘literally’ as hyperbole is fine.

    The sentences “I laughed so much I died” and “I laughed so much I literally died” mean exactly the same thing, but only one of them will have people respond with tHeN hOw ArE yOu TaLkInG tO mE iF yOu’Re DeAd?

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Quantum leap means the tiniest jump and not at all what it’s (internationally) used for.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    A kilobyte is 1024 bytes. Yes, I know “kilo” means 1000 - I don’t care since it’s obvious from context.

    Back in the day, using base-10 prefixes for base-2 stuff was considered fine. 1024 is close enough to 1000, after all. It wasn’t until some dickhead realised that, by insisting that a kilobyte (and the bigger units) was 1000 bytes, they could sell you less hard drive space without lowering the number on the box.

    If you don’t believe me, look at your RAM. Nobody’s ever sold RAM by the “gibibyte”.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    When something is taped, of possible, the piece of tape should have one corner folded over a little bit to make it easy to remove the tape.

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There should be more mature games.

    I don’t mean like sex games, I mean like games intended for adults that can have mature content and mature stories without it being heavily watered down.

    Games should have as much leeway as the film or book industry when it comes to mature content - Though I guess that’s getting murky too lately.

  • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This verges on actually mattering, but knives on magnetic strips should be blade down.

    Pros:

    • when grabbing the knife you are holding it in the safest way possible automatically with the blade pointed down rather than blade up like fucking Chucky.

    • If you botch grabbing it, it falls away from your hand/arm rather than toward/on top of it.

    • the handles hook over the strip and are more secure

    • the handles are all on the same plane, and again if you dislodge a separate knife unexpectedly it falls away from your hand/arm

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    The only good gummy candy brand I have ever tried is Haribo and even then, they need to be chilled in the freezer to make them firm.

    Also, not sure if it’s a hot take on something that doesn’t matter anymore thanks to the current macha craze, but that stuff is absolutely the best when it’s either the flavor of mochi or made straight into a strong, earthy tea and not mixed in another drink.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Static typing can kiss my ass.

    The only reason you like it at work is because you are surrounded by idiots.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’ve got a growing appreciation for Rust. There’s a lot of benefits. But it is overkill for most things I guess.

      I’m a big fan of type hinting like in Python though. You can have some of the safety of static analysis with the flexibility to fuck around if you find it makes it easier to grok the code.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        In programming you declare variables. To keep it simple let’s say there are only 2 types, numbers and words.

        Now 1 is obviously a number, and ‘word’ is obviously a word. If I ask you to divide 100 by ‘word’ you’d have to tell me that’s not possible.

        Now what if a say divide 100 by the “word” ‘10’? Well I’m a strongly typed programming language, you’d have to tell me “well, because you defined it with the single quotes, that’s actually a word so you can’t do math on it.” In a loosely typed language you’d be like “yeah I get that ‘10’ meant the number 10 so I’ll do the math.

        This creates amusing weirdness in loosely typed languages, especially when they use math operators to represent word actions. For instance JavaScript is infamously loosely typed and uses the + sign to join words together so if I say ‘Java’ + ‘Script’, I get back ‘JavaScript’. So all the following are true in JavaScript:

        1+1=2 1-1=0 ‘1’+1=11 because the ‘1’ makes it think you want to join words and it converts the second number 1 to a word ‘11’-1=10 because there’s no word operation applied to the minus sign, so it converted the word ‘11’ to a number

        There’s lots of other tomfoolery, but I’m trying to keep the explanation simple. But any mixing of words and numbers in a strongly typed language would just give you an error.

        I’m with the top reply of this thread, you don’t need strong typing if you understand what the code does.

        • jimmux@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think strong/static typing with inference is the sweet spot. Complex types can change, so it helps to at least have your boundaries well defined. Within the scope of a function, if you need explicit typing on everything then your function might be getting too complex.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s a feature of a programming language that usually, but not always, requires you to declare what sort of data everything is (this is a number, this is text, this is a person object I made, etc.). Then you are required to run your program through a program called a compiler before you are allowed to run it, to (among other things) make sure that everything is what you said it was.

        Basically, it requires you to be extra pedantic, but some say it catches common errors. But imo these are the sort of errors that only come up because you have tons of people working on one project.

  • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Decimate means 1/10th destroyed, lost, whatever. I don’t care that the dictionary says that meaning is obsolete. I get that the meaning of words changes over time, but it has the prefix deci. 1/10th. You don’t get to decide something that starts with 1/10th means near total even if it’s a scary sounding word.

    This is my anthill and I’m dying here.

    • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have so many like that one. At some point in English one billion dropped its value three orders of magnitude and it is spreading to other languages. What now is called a billion it was one thousand million or a milliard.

      More recently, one dude used the word hallucination for what AI do and everyone ran with it, there was already a word to describe that phenomenon, fabulation. Hallucination means something completely different.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I read a Matt Helm spy thriller where the hero knows that his boss has been replaced by a double because the real guy would never use ‘decimate’ to mean ‘eradicate.’

    • railway692@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Does English have sufficiently scary words that are also etymologically correct?

      A population being halvsied just doesn’t hit the same, you know?

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Bimate removal of half.

        Decimate comes from decimatus past participle of decimar removal of 1/10.

      • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It comes from the Latin “decimatio”, a form of Roman military punishment where every tenth man had to be executed by his mates.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My personal gripe in this area is people misusing “objectively”.

      Such as declaring that a certain movie or game is objectively good.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn’t it ‘objectively’ good?

        I understand your point, that a person might not like a particular movie or game and therefore think it’s ‘not good.’

        I’m saying that even when you’re talking about a subjective experience there are criteria that a disinterested party can rate and successful or unsuccessful.

        • SSTF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn’t it ‘objectively’ good?

          If I don’t like that piece of art, am I wrong? Am I objectively incorrect of the opinions inside my own head?

          Lots of people dislike award winning movies, songs, and games. Are those people measurably wrong? No. The plural of subjective opinions is not an objective one.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You can dislike something, and still appreciate its merits.

            Say I get a bowl of broccoli soup. Is the bowl clean? Is the soup the right temperature? Was it made with wholesome ingredients? I may not want it because I don’t like broccoli, but I wouldn’t tell someone else not to try it.

            Objectively, it’s a good bowl of soup.

            See?

            • SSTF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              If a piece of art was created 100 years ago and every professional critic of the time thought it was trash without any merit, and then 100 years later the critical reception of that same piece had changed and it was considered a piece of high art, is that piece of art objectively good? Objectively bad? Was it objectively bad 100 years ago and then somehow became good?

              • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Good point.

                But, unless you’re talking about a hypothetical situation where the art was hidden away and rediscovered, the work must have had some merit or it wouldn’t have lasted 100 years.

                • SSTF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  If an art work has been popular for years, has won dozens of awards, is used by experts as an example of excellence, isn’t it ‘objectively’ good?

                  In this earlier definition looking for objective merit, it leans heavily on professional opinion. If a small number of individuals not thinking a work that is “objectively good” is good doesn’t change that, then the opposite must also be true. Therefore, if we have a situation where the critical consensus is that a work is bad, and only a small number of people think it is good, then we have a piece of art that is “objectively bad” by using the critical standards, but which is held onto by a small number of people who disagree.

                  At the top of this discussion I didn’t define “art” merely as visual pieces (I actually used examples of movie and games). So that art could be anything expressive- music, books, plays, movies, games, and beyond. I can think of art and artists not appreciated in their time, and then over time critical perception turned around.

                  This is all a long way of saying critical opinions are at the end of the day still opinions. That’s why even critics disagree with each other.

          • bizarroland@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I feel like when it comes to judging an artwork, saying that something is objectively good does actually mean “for the majority”, because there is no singular point of absolute goodness to compare it to.

            So even if there’s a little leeway in the definition of “objectively” that doesn’t necessarily mean that the statement is wrong.

            • SSTF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              saying that something is objectively good does actually mean “for the majority”, because there is no singular point of absolute goodness to compare it to.

              I agree completely that people use it like this.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If a state isn’t at least partly in Central Time, it can’t be in the Midwest.

    Obviously not all states in Central Time are in the Midwest, either, that’s just the lowest bar.

    • DeadPixel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m the opposite, except for banana cake, can eat that all day every day. But banana flavour sweets, milk/milkshake etc. you can keep, tastes disgusting to me, even a hint of it in a milkshake ruins it.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Fuck-oranges

      Fuck, oranges

      Fuck oranges (literally)

      Fuck oranges (metaphysically)

      Fuck oranges (metaphorically)

      Fuck oranges (exclamation)