• samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And I’m still gonna bitch about it if they’ve reduced the usefulness of a word due to habitual misuse!

  • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For all intensive purposes, the meaning of words matters less than how we use it. Irregardless of how we decimate it’s meaning, so long as we get the point across there is no need to nip it in the butt. Most people could care less.

  • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well. Sort of.

    Some terminology is better defined by how the relevant experts use it. It’s singular and precise definition is required for any useful dialogue. If 99% of people call a kidney a liver but doctors call it a kidney its a kidney.

    Some terminology evolves and is used differently by different groups. Sometimes the more illiterate group flattens the language by removing nuance or even entirely removing a concept from a language with no replacement. Arguably both definitions may be common usage but one is worse and using it means you are.

  • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve allready to rite we’ll, but than my conscious sad, “For get the rules,” so I let my lose ideals led me. I’m two stubborn to accept that I should of staid in school.

        • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Understanding something eventually isn’t the same as understanding it immediately. The latter is necessary for effective communication. I don’t have the brain power or neurotype to decipher a text like I would if it were latin.

          I’m not saying that you should shut up if you genuinely can’t help it. That’s ok. I’ll figure it out. We can both communicate with each other to the best of our abilities and I won’t mind at all.

          But if you can, you should try to be considerate. If you think you spending slightly less time on it is worth me having to spend much more time on understanding it, I find that to be a dick move and I won’t give you the time of day forever.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What if I told you that if everyone uses a word the “wrong” way, in slightly different ways, it’s wrong?

  • Digit@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago
    1. I imagine you’re using “everyone” wrong.
    2. Not necessarily so. Use your imagination.
    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      If it is not literally everyone, it still might be correct in the way that using a word for (one of) its jargon meaning(s) is correct. So, correct in context.

      When using words to convey information to an audience to whom you might not be able to clarify, it is useful to use words for the meanings listed in common dictionar(y/ies) (“correctly”) so that the audience can resolve confusions through those dictionaries.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think they were joking about the fact that the meaning of ‘literally’ has changed in the common vernacular to mean ‘figuratively’