okr765
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 months ago

Noise

mander.xyz

message-square
69
fedilink
881

Noise

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 9 months ago
message-square
69
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    175
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was told to touch grass, but when I did that it yelled “sexual harassment.”

    • BreadOven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      141
      ·
      9 months ago

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It only said it licks feet. Gotcha.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          9 months ago

          Still going to do the splits

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          ah but how can you prove that the implication wasn’t that it’d lick anything that touches it? you can’t extrapolate exclusivity from only one data point, it’s more sensible to assume slutty grass

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It doesn’t say “it licked my feet” which would be one data point. It says “what if it licked your feet”, that is asserting that one condition and no others. You can’t extrapolate anything else.

    • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sexual grassment

    • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Maybe it was Henry the anti assgrab crabgrass. https://youtu.be/1n7NB-lPJuU

  • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m something of a “not a scientist” myself

    • LordTrychon@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same. Would like answers.

      • LordTrychon@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did some searching. The paper from 2019 that discussed this -

        We recorded 65 dBSPL (dB of sound pressure level) ultrasonic sounds 4 inches (10 cm) from tomato and tobacco plants, implying that these sounds could be detected by some organisms from up to several feet (meters) away.

        https://www.sci.news/biology/plants-ultrasonic-clicks-07895.html

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would like some weed. As a nonscientist, answers come secondary to weed.

    • grandel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Its legal to “not be a scientist” where I live

  • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    9 months ago

    “I am not a scientist, I just smoke weed” needs to be a shirt.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not sure what it actually means though

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        “High thoughts,” almost like shower thoughts, but driven by weed and, in my experience, learning an interesting fact or tidbit.

        So they’re not a scientist and don’t have formal training in sounds or plants or animals, they learned a fact and got high and connected some dots, haha

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Gotcha. “I’m not an expert, but I have profound thoughts” is the message

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        imagine a shirt that says “I’m not a scientist”. it’s basically that but if you smoke weed you are obligated to tell everyone unprompted, so this is for weed smokers who want a shirt that says I’m not a scientist.

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      a further idea: Front of the shirt says “I am not a scientist”

      Back of the shirt says “I just smoke weed”

  • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 months ago

    That explains why my fuzzy terrorist always wants to bite them.

    • ReputedlyDeplorable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, if the plant is screaming at having its leaves torn, my little psychopath would absolutely be like “bite it harder!”

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wait… If the plants are whispering to my cat late at night. Is that why the little fucker spazzes out and goes crazy all over the house at 3 am?

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, during the day plants are busy working (photosynthesising, defending, sticking pollen to bugs), they only have a chance to get socially chatty at night.

      And cats love plant humour.
      Except that of succulents. They crunch too much.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      That and all the ghost activity at 3am

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        what hz do ghosts talk at?

        • TheOneAndOnly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          800!

  • LordTrychon@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    9 months ago

    Did some checking, out of curiosity.

    And yeah. Interesting as hell.

    We recorded 65 dBSPL (dB of sound pressure level) ultrasonic sounds 4 inches (10 cm) from tomato and tobacco plants, implying that these sounds could be detected by some organisms from up to several feet (meters) away.

    https://www.sci.news/biology/plants-ultrasonic-clicks-07895.html

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your move, vegans

      • NardoPolo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve heard the screams of the vegetables!

        • craigers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Been waiting 17 years to pull that out, lol. Perfect.

        • WeebLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I was half expecting this song

          • Flummoxed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was absolutely expecting this song. I’m always expecting this song, but especially when I am fast asleep. The cries of the carrots…

      • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        CARROTS CAINT FIGHT BACK

        • Omega_Man@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Pineapples dissolve your mouth. Anything with capsaicin is non verbally asking you not to eat it.

          • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            …and anything with that many spikes on it is visually threatening your gullet, but it’s still delicious.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      They can also fight you.

      https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/this-machete-is-controlled-by-a-plant-yielding-robotic-arm

      • LordTrychon@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh good. I was worried they were defenseless.

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    9 months ago

    Plants talk? As in rustle with movement or communicate through sound? Can plants hear? The world is amazing, I’ll be on Wikipedia for a few.

    • ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕪@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are high frequency sounds that they emit when they experience certain stimuli, for example when not having enough water or leaves being torn. As far as I know some other plants or insects might be evolutionarily tuned to recognize those sounds and react to them. So yes, in a way plants can talk.

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      !digitalbioacoustics@lemmy.world

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 months ago

    does that mean cats hear house plants scream while they are chewing on their leaves

    • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s why they do it!

      I’m not a cat or a plant scientist.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is what happens when you get too high and Dr Dog - Listening In is playing

    • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s actually the first time I’ve seen Dr Dog referenced in the wild (outside of Pat Finnerty’s channel.)

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also wild seeing this…I had never heard of them till I started dating my gf. She and most of her friends are big fans and I just saw them live a few weeks ago.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    How do we know that sound signals recorded aren’t just from the release of biomolecules? Using the nervous system to produce sound is a more intentional process than the release of biomolecules for chemical signaling, which is something even simple multicellular organism do

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re right that it doesn’t have to be talking. But it is a sound cats and dogs can hear. They do hear the plant noise, which is cool.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s cool to us.

        I can absolutely confirm that neither cats nor dogs particularly enjoy hearing multiple frequencies in that range, as I use ultrasonic noisemakers to train dogs and cats. Both species have had specific individuals that reacted as though I had just beaten them, and all the individuals of both species reacted in such a way that it was clear that they would do just about anything to never hear those noises again.

        That being said, I wonder if they could hear that frequency all the time and were freaked out that a human was shouting in plant language.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The unpleasant reaction could be to the shape of the sound rather than just the frequency. Like a sin wave isn’t a pleasant sound, though it’s not bad at lower amplitudes.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Possible. I couldn’t tell you since I can’t hear it, and am uncertain if I have a microphone that could detect that frequency

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Do they show similar signs of distress around plants in general? Are they reluctant to enter forests? Do they randomly destroy plants?

              Lol I thought it would be clear until that last question, which is something both cats and dogs are known to do on occasion.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Maybe it has something to do with the volume. If plants are at, let’s say, 40dB and you blast the animals with a 100 dB sound…

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You were probably saying “fuck me” in a sultry voice. I sympathize with the animals.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right, but what’s the source of the sound? If it’s not intentionally produced, but rather a chemical reaction or reaction byproduct, then it says something different about plant communication

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I agree, I just don’t think it’s that relevant to the post, which was more about how our pets experience the world.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The sounds produced by plants aren’t used for communication, at least as far as I’ve understood it. They are, as you say, just sounds produced as part of other processes. They aren’t talking any more than a tree talks when in creaks in the wind.

  • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is it possible to record those higher frequencies and then turn them down so I can hear how noisy it is for my dog at home?

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Probably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.

    • rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.

      • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You also need to have a sampling rate that’s equal to 2x the highest frequency you want to capture.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    “I can hear the innermost thoughts of plants” - yup, sounds crazy to me! (Therefore let’s do it - make it happen!:-)

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sorry to link to CNN but I was skeptical and here’s a good enough summary

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/30/world/plants-make-sounds-scn/index.html

  • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    It would be really neat if someone made a sensor that could tell you whether your plant needs to be watered.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      https://www.instructables.com/Soil-Moisture-Sensor-Raspberry-Pi/

      • blackstampede@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I’ve messed around with water sensors before. I just thought it would be neat to measure it via stress on the plant itself.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        An RPI to measure moisture seems complete overkill. There’sESP Home for small sensors https://www.instructables.com/Building-a-Wireless-Soil-Moisture-Sensor-With-ESPH/

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Pi picos are pretty good for iot projects like that. ESP are more power efficient, but a pi can be more self sufficient. I think it depends on the project.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The linked project recommended a Pi3 though.

            • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Ah, that’s just overkill.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.12K users / day
  • 4.4K users / week
  • 10.6K users / month
  • 23.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 14.6K subscribers
  • 4.45K Posts
  • 99.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org