• Darkness343@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    All of those examples are just secondary achievements. The true purpose of us humans is to live and make life.

    Everything else is just a bonus

  • Aequitas@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t like this logic. It implies that a person’s value depends on their achievements. The only difference between the two is what the most important achievements are. Ultimately, this reinforces the right-wing logic that there are people of different values.

    • halvar@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      I would say starting an argument from a point of view which the other is guaranteed to agree with is a great tool to convince people.

      In this case it’s pretty obvious that people who say shit like “women only exist to bare children” will also look up to people with great achievements to their name. As such these to beliefs can be played against eachother.

      If it won’t convince the original bum saying the stupid, it will be a very spectacular way to disarm their logic in front of other people with similar but not so extreme opinions.

    • dualistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      But all people aren’t of equal worth. There isn’t an official arbitrator but we get to decide for ourselves, and there isn’t a much better way to evaluate them than their actions.

      The “all men created equal” in the… US consitution or declaration or whatever is complete nonsense.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I try hard to put myself into other people’s shoes but I find it impossible to imagine being as fuckin’ stupid as this.

    Edit: I wonder if he applies the same logic to men. He looks over 24 to me.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    That list does not affect him because he doesn’t consider those things to be achievements.

    Should’ve just told him his dick is small and he’s a virgin. He would’ve cried himself to sleep over that

    • huppakee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Even if we had it, imagine how small your life is if you actually believe we are born to do a biological job.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Imagine if we flipped the tables. If it’s all on women to have and raise kids and nothing more, wouldn’t that mean a man’s job is to get laid/donate sperm, impregnate someone once, and that’s it? If that’s all there is and he’s fulfilled his role, there’s no need to stay alive after that. Like a male bee, exploding after mating. Why bother with society, hobbies, learning and growing? OP’s “job” as a man is nothing more than to literally fuck off and die, mission complete.

        Obviously I don’t believe that, just taking his argument to its logical conclusion. I’ve heard people say that women are just for making babies so many times in my life, but I’ve never heard men’s role put in the same terms.

        It sounds ridiculous because it is ridiculous. We’re all so much more than our biological equipment. I know I’m preaching to the choir here, I just had to rant for a moment.

        • Charapaso@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Unfortunately they’ll probably just say they are meant to be the masters of a harem and kill any potential rival males. Literally troglodyte shit

        • adry@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I like that reasoning. If I had any toxic male friends saying shit like this I might use it, thanks!

  • red_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Margaret Hamilton: Discovered chaos theory and then wrote the software landing the first people on the moon

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      And lately we have preserved a lot of different versions of the compiled/weaved AGU code.

  • Daisy (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Don’t forget Noether! She discovered one of the most fundamental theorems of the universe: (paraphrasing) there is a 1:1 relationship between a conservation law (eg momentum) and symmetry (eg spacetime). This has shaped a lot of modern physics and helped explain otherwise unexplainable phenomena!

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This doesn’t even make sense from a (pretty stupid) “you have to have children” point of view, what is stopping women to have kids later in life, when they’ve got an education, know what they want in life, and are financially and mentally stable enough to raise them?

    Of course I know the answer starts with “m” and ends with “isogyny”, but it’s a very stupid take even in its own framework

    • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ok, now listen to me. Please, PLEASE, never again say something like

      it’s a very stupid take even in its own framework

      You never know who’s reading this and I guarantee you that there is always someone ready to take that as a personal challenge.

      • jamie_veal (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Sometimes I do enjoy making conclusions from stupid and insane premises, can be a fun little thinking exercise. There seems to be a little devil’s advocate in my head.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Listen, power to women, and Vera Rubin’s work was amazing and she deserves every praise.

    But nobody has ever proven the existence of Dark Matter. What’s proven is that our current mathematical models do not accurately represent the universe due to the way things move and effects of gravity, under our current understanding, requiring a large amount of mass that we have not observed.

    Does that make sense? It could be that our models or understandings are just wrong, or it could be that there is some magical unobservable matter, but we don’t know. We haven’t proven anything.

    The reason I think this is important is because we keep throwing money at bigger and bigger dark matter detection chambers, and we keep operating on the possibly incorrect assumption of dark matter while we create new theories.

    • Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What’s proven is that our current mathematical models do not accurately represent the universe due to the way things move and effects of gravity

      This is actually the bit that Vera Rubin discovered. The summary of her discovery in the quote is the issue :)

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The reason I think this is important is because we keep throwing money at bigger and bigger dark matter detection chambers, and we keep operating on the possibly incorrect assumption of dark matter while we create new theories.

      Okay, Sabine, whatever you say. I’m sure bubble chambers and TPCs (I assume since you’re targeting “chambers” that other experiments like DEAP are fine) for direct detection are a catastrophic money sink that you’re totally not exaggerating even a little.


      Edit: Wait, are you specifically targeting the funding for the search for WIMPs? Since you’re just joining us from your 15-year coma, I’m afraid to inform you that problems have gotten much worse for science than bubble chamber and TPC costs.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    My female friend had a female doctor try to talk her out of a contraceptives prescription; that she was 28 and should be having babies…

    It’s not a misogyny thing, per se, rather just people that define their lives by the templates supplied by societal stereotypes. Never take advice from a person that doesn’t think for themself.

    • CybranM@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Doing something permanent at 28 could be shortsighted and I would agree with the doctor in that case but surely a prescription is just temporary? I don’t see why the doctor would advice against it

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Because the doctor is stuck in the mindset that women are baby factories and they should be that above whatever else they want to do in life.

        “Boomer isn’t just an age group, it’s a state of mind.” -some rando on the internet

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    To be fair, they did say “biological job”

    So I’d go with Rosalind Franklin who was 30ish when she did the X-ray diffusion thing and found dna was molecular.

    Or Barbara McClintock, 46, for her work on “jumping genes”.

    ;)